Page 5 of 5
Re: Blocking or lack thereof
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 11:02 am
by markshark84
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Cool story bro.
maybe before you post in threads with random bs you ought to read the title.
Buying Robert more time, imo, is the only way he has a CHANCE to be successful. He may very well be toast, but more time to make a decision- if only a little- would benefit him aswell as the staff trying to evaluate him.
McCoys superior skills got him sacked almost with the same frequency vs sub par pass rushers and he had the best lineman in when he played aswell. Not excuses by any stretch- read his stat line. Read the op. Read and find we agree more then you are disagreeing with no one in particular. .
I think the internet Gods are in your favor because I wrote this long winded reply, but when I hit submit it never showed up..... now I don't feel like or have the time to reply (I'm too busy doing karate in my parent's basement

). Perhaps this is the internet God's way of telling me to shut up.
2 quick notes: The subject of this thread implies that blocking (and you literally cited everyone other than the QB as needing to improve) is a major contributing factor to our demise as it relates to the offense and inherently, the QB. I personally think it is not everyone around him, but in fact 95% RGIII's fault (I am not counting playcalling; just on-field play). Also, literally every single poster within this thread discussed the QB and subject matter similar to mine --- yet I'm the one that doesn't understand the title.....

Again, your subjectivity clouds what you read.
Second, McCoy's sack rate is 12% vs. RGIII's 17%. If you include Cousins & McCoy it drops to 5.2%. And trust me, I ALWAYS read the stat lines. I'm a meticulous SOB. You should know that by now.
Re: Blocking or lack thereof
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 1:46 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
^ if you read the entire thread I wasnt happy where it strayed either.. and I posted as much.
I understand your sentiment about the qb needing to improve, but on the few plays he was asked to BLOCK he did a good enough job. We shall see how Colt fares behind this terrible line.
12% vs 17% isnt much of a difference if you factor in the pass rush level of talent as well as who was playing on the line, particularly left tackle
Re: Blocking or lack thereof
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 2:02 pm
by StorminMormon86
I think you should change your username to cowboykillerzMcCoy
Re: Blocking or lack thereof
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 2:07 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
Im good thanks.
Coming from StorminMormon tho, THATS pretty funny!
Re: Blocking or lack thereof
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 4:05 pm
by StorminMormon86
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Im good thanks.
Coming from StorminMormon tho, THATS pretty funny!
I was just ribbing you. No big deal.
But seriously, if we beat Dallas again...
Re: Blocking or lack thereof
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:54 pm
by riggofan
StorminMormon86 wrote:cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Im good thanks.
Coming from StorminMormon tho, THATS pretty funny!
I was just ribbing you. No big deal.
But seriously, if we beat Dallas again...
Seriously if McCoy was somehow able to beat Dallas TWICE this season, it might help make up for one of the worst Redskins seasons in recent memory. Just a bit.
Re: Blocking or lack thereof
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 9:38 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
StorminMormon86 wrote:cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Im good thanks.
Coming from StorminMormon tho, THATS pretty funny!
I was just ribbing you. No big deal.
But seriously, if we beat Dallas again...
I know bro, its all good.. luckily- ruining rg3, benching him, even getting rid of him cant take away his debut year sweeping the pukes. Ima really flip my lid if he winds up being a puke and shredding US for years to come- behind that line its possible. . The Jerruh already is showing his support of rg3 so its not so far fetched
Re: Blocking or lack thereof
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2014 9:33 pm
by PulpExposure
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:StorminMormon86 wrote:cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Im good thanks.
Coming from StorminMormon tho, THATS pretty funny!
I was just ribbing you. No big deal.
But seriously, if we beat Dallas again...
I know bro, its all good.. luckily- ruining rg3, benching him, even getting rid of him cant take away his debut year sweeping the pukes. Ima really flip my lid if he winds up being a puke and shredding US for years to come- behind that line its possible. . The Jerruh already is showing his support of rg3 so its not so far fetched
I'm not worried if he goes to Dallas. They'll ruin him just like we did.
I'm worried he'll go to Philadelphia where Chip Kelly is getting production from Mark Sanchez, who is freaking terrible. I can see RG3 going there and getting rehabilitated, and to a system that is not too dissimilar to his Baylor offense. And then watching him torch us twice a year.
Re: Blocking or lack thereof
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2014 10:11 pm
by StorminMormon86
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:StorminMormon86 wrote:cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Im good thanks.
Coming from StorminMormon tho, THATS pretty funny!
I was just ribbing you. No big deal.
But seriously, if we beat Dallas again...
I know bro, its all good.. luckily- ruining rg3, benching him, even getting rid of him cant take away his debut year sweeping the pukes. Ima really flip my lid if he winds up being a puke and shredding US for years to come- behind that line its possible. . The Jerruh already is showing his support of rg3 so its not so far fetched
If he goes to Dull-ass you really need to change your user name.
Re: Blocking or lack thereof
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2014 11:29 pm
by SkinsJock
I don't understand - I thought the reason we might not keep RG3 is because the kid cannot play QB
if that's the case, who cares where he goes
I'm surprised more of his detractors aren't hoping he will go to an NFC East franchise so we can get to laugh at him on the sidelines 2 times a year - I mean, if he cannot play QB, why not let him go somewhere he can't hurt us
