Bush - Kerry Foreign Policy Debate

Wanna talk about politics, your favorite hockey team... vegetarian recipes?
Scooter
scooter
scooter
Posts: 1085
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 9:58 am
Location: NM
Contact:

Post by Scooter »

First of all, Saddam was a terrorist. Saddam sheltered terrorists. Saddam paid terrorists homocide bombers to strap bombs to their asses and board a bus, invade a wedding party or any restaurant that might have lots of Jews inside. To hold yourself out at THE voice of reason, or THE only person that cares about the loss of life of any American in Iraq is pathetic. There is no - win the peace - you John Kerry pantleg hangers!

This war was not made up in Texas to attract voters - in spite of the Dems hero - Ted Kennedy's prod.

The game has changed. We have to take it to these motherless bastards where they slither. And we're succeeding, in spite of you covering your ears and shouting, "What mistakes have you made Mr. President, What mistakes have you made Sir, What mistakes have you made you war mongering Republican, What mistakes have you made baby killer..." -

I've told two pollsters I'm voting for Kerry - although I'll probably be sued by Edwards when I don't pull the trigger for him. Oh, and I'm against gun control, and I'm for booting old people out in the street with no drugs at all...I bow to your superior intelligence.
User avatar
cvillehog
Hog
Posts: 5220
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 3:03 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Post by cvillehog »

cvillehog wrote:You can insult me all you want, but that doesn't make you right or support your possition on this matter.

I supported the President in going to war. I believed him that there were WMD and that Saddam was a threat. However, I've come to realize that the Bush administration has been lying to the American public at every opportunity. They sent Collin Powell, a man I hold in the highest respect, to the UN and made him lie. They have lied about the motivation and potential results of their own policies, and of their opponents.

Was Saddam dangerous? Yes. Should he have been removed? Yes. Was he MORE dagerous than al Qaeda? NO! Should he have been removed unilaterally and in a way that has distracted from the "War on Terror"? NO! Should the planning and execution of the Iraq war been done in such a way as to weaken our global alliances and at the same time strenghten the resolve of terrorists worldwide? NO!

And don't give me crap about 75% of al Qaeda being captured or killed. That is 75% of the known al Qaeda as of Sept. 11, 2001. The Iraq war has truly become the greatest training video terrorists could have hoped for, and membership is up into the 10's of thousands.
Fios
The Evil Straw
The Evil Straw
Posts: 8135
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 2:30 pm
Location: Leather Chair
Contact:

Post by Fios »

I bow to your superior intelligence.

Thank you.
RIP Sean Taylor
Scooter
scooter
scooter
Posts: 1085
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 9:58 am
Location: NM
Contact:

Post by Scooter »

How much do Michael Moore undies cost anyway? To say nothing good is happening in Iraq is void of intellectual honesty. Women were snatched off the street in Iraq at Uday's whim. After repeatedly raping them, he then disfigured them, tortured them and on at least one occassion, fed them to his dogs. Last I heard, poor little Uday had been shot & killed.

The billions of dollars Saddam was getting in the Oil for Food program, sponsored by your heros at the UN, isn't in place any longer. Now the money is actually going to the schools and hospitals it was intended for to begin with.

Since you haven't seen it, there are terrorists monitoring the airwaves in the US. Your pals Kennedy and Kerry are giving them verbal ammo in undermining the effort to free millions of Iraqis. If the American media were to point out anyone as a success story - that person automatically becomes a target.

I know you think George Bush hired people to dress in black hoods and behead people - and have forgotten that triple the number of Iraqis have died in their fight for freedom... but the facts are vastly different.

The training video for terrorists happened long ago. The lack of response in Kobar Towers and the USS Cole, along with no response in attacks on American Embassies around the world gave them the impression we were affraid of them. They're emboldend by your defeatist attitude. Ever read a letter from a soldier in Iraq? Do you subscribe to the Ted Rall philosophy?

Freedom isn't free. Fighting terrorist in Iraq is much better than fighting them at your local elementary school, or shopping mall. In the end, the terrorists will be exterminated. People around the world will be ready to point out future evil bastards - as what they are.

You wanna pretend it's GW's fault - it's a free country. In the meantime, are you doing anything to help the military families? No, you'd rather preach to the unconvertible. Why not start up a heater, give a military spouse a ride to the grocery store, buy them a child seat... nah, your world of knowing everything and being all feeling wouldn't survive five seconds.

Mainly, your words imply that the soldiers fighting the terrorists are mindless robots - simply following what they're told. This election, the military votes WILL count - and they're overwhelmingly in favor of the President... mindless trolls that they are. I'll side with the troops and the President... mindless troll that I am.
User avatar
cvillehog
Hog
Posts: 5220
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 3:03 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Post by cvillehog »

cvillehog wrote:
cvillehog wrote:You can insult me all you want, but that doesn't make you right or support your possition on this matter.

I supported the President in going to war. I believed him that there were WMD and that Saddam was a threat. However, I've come to realize that the Bush administration has been lying to the American public at every opportunity. They sent Collin Powell, a man I hold in the highest respect, to the UN and made him lie. They have lied about the motivation and potential results of their own policies, and of their opponents.

Was Saddam dangerous? Yes. Should he have been removed? Yes. Was he MORE dagerous than al Qaeda? NO! Should he have been removed unilaterally and in a way that has distracted from the "War on Terror"? NO! Should the planning and execution of the Iraq war been done in such a way as to weaken our global alliances and at the same time strenghten the resolve of terrorists worldwide? NO!

And don't give me crap about 75% of al Qaeda being captured or killed. That is 75% of the known al Qaeda as of Sept. 11, 2001. The Iraq war has truly become the greatest training video terrorists could have hoped for, and membership is up into the 10's of thousands.
Post Reply