WHO IS THIS REPLAY GUY

air_hog · Post by **air_hog** » Sun Oct 10, 2004 10:03 pm

WHY ARE THE REDSKINS PAYING A GUY TO TELL WHETHER OR NOT TO CHALENGE THE PLAY? HE SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!! WHY WOULD HE TELL THEM TO CHALENGE THE ED REED PLAY? IN FAST MOTION YOU COULD TELL IT WAS A FUMBLE. THIS GUY IS LOSING OUR GAMES FOR US BECAUSE HE TELL JOE GIBBS TO CHALENGE STUPID PLAYS AND THEN WE LOSE OUR TIME OUTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

redskingush · Post by **redskingush** » Sun Oct 10, 2004 10:31 pm

Im with you, has this guy got a challenge right yet this year?

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Sun Oct 10, 2004 11:24 pm

Why would they hire an official is beyond me? They can't get the calls right on the field what makes them thuink he can do it from further away. lol

Champsturf · Post by **Champsturf** » Sun Oct 10, 2004 11:31 pm

This guy is AWFUL! and NO, i don't thin he's made a good call yet. a few blown challenges and now stupid ones.

anybody like my new sig?

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Sun Oct 10, 2004 11:38 pm

WHO IS THIS REPLAY GUY

A dead man if he tells anyone what his job is

welch · Post by **welch** » Mon Oct 11, 2004 1:49 am

The play was close. Any movement forward is an INC.

Of course, a QB qith a quickcr release would have been throwing, rather that finishing his wind-up when Reed hit his arm.

But Betts???

DEHog · Post by **DEHog** » Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:45 am

I could tell it was a fumble from section 414 without a reply!

doroshjt · Post by **doroshjt** » Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:57 am

We should costanza the guy, ask for his advice and do the exact opposite. DEHog, it looked like a fumble from 410 as well.

oafusp · Post by **oafusp** » Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:17 pm

I saw it live and I was seeing double.

Clearly a fumble....fire the damn replay guy.
Maybe it will bring the cost of beer down at the stadium.

-burp