
Lavar Out 2-4 Weeks?
-
- piggie
- Posts: 137
- youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 7:36 pm
- Location: Texas
- REDEEMEDSKIN
- ~~
- Posts: 8496
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:12 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia
I'm in agreement with those who see the silver lining in this situation. The defense will be fine,, and play in a more controlled manner.
My only disappointment was that we lost Lavar just as he began to break out of his "unrealized potential" shell. I was looking forward to proving his harshest critics (myself included) wrong.
CONSPIRACY THEORY ALERT: I'm probably reaching here too far here, but how much do you all think the impending arbitration hearing on the $6.5 million "bonus" and the advice of the Postons (on account of KW2 missing out on HIS incentives after the injury) influence Lavar's decision to have surgery so soon, without seeking a second opinion? With the postons in his corner, I wouldn't be surprised to see Lavar out a few weeks and the team's LB corps suffer, thereby giving the Postons "lee-verage" in future negotiations. AGAIN, I'm reaching, but I wanna see if anyone else thought about this.
My only disappointment was that we lost Lavar just as he began to break out of his "unrealized potential" shell. I was looking forward to proving his harshest critics (myself included) wrong.
CONSPIRACY THEORY ALERT: I'm probably reaching here too far here, but how much do you all think the impending arbitration hearing on the $6.5 million "bonus" and the advice of the Postons (on account of KW2 missing out on HIS incentives after the injury) influence Lavar's decision to have surgery so soon, without seeking a second opinion? With the postons in his corner, I wouldn't be surprised to see Lavar out a few weeks and the team's LB corps suffer, thereby giving the Postons "lee-verage" in future negotiations. AGAIN, I'm reaching, but I wanna see if anyone else thought about this.
Last edited by REDEEMEDSKIN on Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
Back and better than ever!
Pokes4Life wrote:Now you have Marcus from the defenseless Colts. LOL
This post personifies how little you know about the 2004 Washington Redskins.
Oh sure you can crack jokes, but you don't appear to be able to have a conversation about football, and if you don't think Marcus Washington is a good football player, then you just don't know anything about football. That's why the Colts tried to re-sign him, they had no desire to let him go.
And he has easily been the best performer on a defense that has played well and given the Redskins the opportunity to win 2 games. Unfortunately, they didn't get any help from the offense last week.
He's #53... but you'll know that soon enough.

Sean Taylor was one of a kind, may he rest in peace.
- TheMagicThree
- Hog
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 12:37 pm
- Location: Nashville, TN.
Pokes4Life wrote:Yawn! Yep, listen to Justice's infinite wisdom as he peers through his crystal ball. I thought Trotter was the next great LB paired along side Lafart? Whatever happened to him? LOL Now you have Marcus from the defenseless Colts. LOL
Yeah, um maybe if you checked your facts you'd realise that Marcus Washington is third in the league in tackles and has been a dominant force in the preseason and thus far in the year. He's a beast, just wait and you'll see.
First off, I told you all about Marcus Washington was awesome from day one.
Two, Boss, can you just get rid of Poke? I liked Gambit more than him.
MY THEORY ALERT
Is Poke possibly Gambit trying to come back and be a good person since he loves this forum so much? I mean, poke seems to know about stuff discussed before even I was her.
Two, Boss, can you just get rid of Poke? I liked Gambit more than him.
MY THEORY ALERT
Is Poke possibly Gambit trying to come back and be a good person since he loves this forum so much? I mean, poke seems to know about stuff discussed before even I was her.
"I said when he retired that Joe Gibbs was the best coach I'd ever faced." - Bill Parcells