predicted order of NFC East finish?

America's Team · Post by **America's Team** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:43 pm

I have it:

Iggles
'Boys (wildcard)
Skins
Gints

All you Skins fans okay with this? Most experts seem to agree with my order.

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:52 pm

What experts? This is the way it will go:
'Skins (11-5)
Feebles (9-7)
'Pies (5-11)
Gints (4-12)
You heard it here first from the only expert you need to know!

America's Team · Post by **America's Team** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:56 pm

which ones are the Cowboys? the Feebles or Pies?

Dude, you are WAAAAAAAYYYYYY too blinded by skins love.

I'd bet you on this and take your money, but i don't know you.

NO ONE with credibility is picking Washington to win the division.

Even I'm picking my 'Boys to finish behind Philly, and we all know that we can mark down two wins for Dallas over Washington this and most other years.

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:09 pm

Cowpies
Feeble Eagles.
Actually several experts predict the 'Skins to win the division. Scouts, Inc. had us rated #8 in the NFL, the Eagles #12, your 'Pies #25, and the Giants a woeful #30. Not to mention several ESPN people not named Pasquerelli.
I am blinded by 'Skins love, but that doesn't change the fact that we will finish 11-5 this season, and win the division.

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:11 pm

America's Team wrote:which ones are the Cowboys? the Feebles or Pies?

Dude, you are WAAAAAAAYYYYYY too blinded by skins love.

I'd bet you on this and take your money, but i don't know you.

NO ONE with credibility is picking Washington to win the division.

Even I'm picking my 'Boys to finish behind Philly, and we all know that we can mark down two wins for Dallas over Washington this and most other years.

My ranking looks just like yours, except the Skins and Boys switched.

No chance you sweep us this year, and a good chance you get swept.

"I said when he retired that Joe was the
best coach I'd ever faced," Cowboys coach Bill Parcells said.

America's Team · Post by **America's Team** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:14 pm

tell you what, if the skins win the division, i'll post on this site that the cowboys suck. BUT, if the boys win the division, you need to go to a 'skins game wearing a cowboys sweatshirt. shouldn't be an issue for you, mr. deadskin expert.

think i'm done for the evening. chew on my note and put your butt where your mouth is.

Justice Hog · Post by **Justice Hog** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:15 pm

1. Eagles (11-5)
2. Redskins (10-6) [wildcard]
3. Cowboys (9-7) [out of the playoffs, where they belong]
4. Giants (7-9)

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:17 pm

Haha! You said the Cowboys suck!

America's Team wrote:the cowboys suck

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:17 pm

Here's the way I see it breaking down for us this season. We will beat the 6 teams we definitely should beat:
Giants (twice)
Browns
Bears
Lions
49ers
And split the remaining 10 games 5-5.
That leaves us at 11-5, and atop the division.

America's Team · Post by **America's Team** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:18 pm

Justice - at least your predictions are somewhat plausible.

you're not a 100% whackjob, as your scenario COULD happen. that said, i see the skins @ roughly 9-7, one game behind my 'boys.

America's Team · Post by **America's Team** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:20 pm

just to be thorough, i could also write that that redskins suck, but they'll prove that for me twice to dallas this year.

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:21 pm

America's Team wrote:Justice - at least your predictions are somewhat plausible.

you're not a 100% whackjob, as your scenario COULD happen. that said, i see the skins @ roughly 9-7, one game behind my 'boys.

What 10 games do you see the Cowboys winning this season?

And if you can't do it without splitting with the Redskins, it's not a "plausible scenario."

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:23 pm

There is no way in hell that South America's Team wins 10 games this season. Your schedule is much tougher this season, your team is much weaker, and you won't get the lucky breaks this year (the Giants' and Eagles' kickoffs come to mind).

America's Team · Post by **America's Team** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:25 pm

South America's team - i like that.

that's right. the boys have the tougher schedule than than the skins because the boys earned a tougher one. if the skins cannot make the playoffs with the creampuffs on their schedule, you boys had BETTER not show your electronic faces on this site until next fall.

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:27 pm

America's Team wrote:South America's team - i like that.

that's right. the boys have the tougher schedule than than the skins because the boys earned a tougher one. if the skins cannot make the playoffs with the creampuffs on their schedule, you boys had BETTER not show your electronic faces on this site until next fall.

Answer the question, *beeeep*!

(Edit: I broke the rules!

)

Justice Hog · Post by **Justice Hog** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:28 pm

America's team writes:

you're not a 100% whackjob

Maybe I am, but (just doing my job here), I have to caution you on making this type of post.

To say to me directly that I'm not 100% whackjob implies that I am less than 100% whackjob....therefore, you are calling me a whackjob in some regard. This is the type of direct name calling which is not allowed pursuant to Rule #5 of our message boards.

Don't get me wrong, I got your point; however, you would have been better saying my "opinion" was somewhat of a whackjob rather than "me"....you follow?

To cvillehog, the "Candypants" reference is a direct violation and not appropriate.

America's Team · Post by **America's Team** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:29 pm

what's the question, boss?

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:33 pm

Justice Hog wrote:To cvillehog, the "Candypants" reference is a direct violation and not appropriate.

All I said was that his pants are made of candy!

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:35 pm

America's Team wrote:what's the question, boss?

cvillehog wrote:What 10 games do you see the Cowboys winning this season?

And if you can't do it without splitting with the Redskins, it's not a "plausible scenario."

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:35 pm

America's Team wrote:what's the question, boss?

If by boss you mean me (it's confusing because the guy who runs the site is "Boss Hog", but since he hasn't posted in this thread, I can only assume you mean me), the question is in my post above.

cvillehog wrote:America's Team wrote:
Justice - at least your predictions are somewhat plausible.

you're not a 100% whackjob, as your scenario COULD happen. that said, i see the skins @ roughly 9-7, one game behind my 'boys.

What 10 games do you see the Cowboys winning this season?

And if you can't do it without splitting with the Redskins, it's not a "plausible scenario."

America's Team · Post by **America's Team** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:39 pm

i see dallas taking two from New York, splitting with philly and i'll give you a split with wash (but recent history has shown that the boys sweep wash even when they suck). that's 4-2 in division.

they beat cleveland, pitt, chicago, detroit, cincy and take one of the remaining road games against minn, gb, seattle or balty.

that's 10

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:42 pm

America's Team wrote:i see dallas taking two from New York, splitting with philly and i'll give you a split with wash (but recent history has shown that the boys sweep wash even when they suck). that's 4-2 in division.

they beat cleveland, pitt, chicago, detroit, cincy and take one of the remaining road games against minn, gb, seattle or balty.

that's 10

See, I think it will be different.

Two wins from NY, one from DC. I'll give you cleveland, chi, det, and balt.

You lose to pitt, cincy, minn, gb and seattle, philly twice and the skins.

7-9

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:49 pm

America's Team wrote:i see dallas taking two from New York, splitting with philly and i'll give you a split with wash (but recent history has shown that the boys sweep wash even when they suck). that's 4-2 in division.

they beat cleveland, pitt, chicago, detroit, cincy and take one of the remaining road games against minn, gb, seattle or balty.

that's 10

I'll give you the 2 over the Gints, and even a split with us, but you will only beat Chicago and Detroit from your remaining schedule. That's 5-11 in my book.

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:51 pm

cvillehog wrote:
America's Team wrote:i see dallas taking two from New York, splitting with philly and i'll give you a split with wash (but recent history has shown that the boys sweep wash even when they suck). that's 4-2 in division.

they beat cleveland, pitt, chicago, detroit, cincy and take one of the remaining road games against minn, gb, seattle or balty.

that's 10

See, I think it will be different.

Two wins from NY, one from DC. I'll give you cleveland, chi, det, and balt.

You lose to pitt, cincy, minn, gb and seattle, philly twice and the skins.

7-9

I think that is generous. They will be beaten by Baltimore. They may squeak past Cleveland. Ok, I'll go as far as 6-10 if we don't sweep them.

air_hog · Post by **air_hog** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:55 pm

I hate to say this, but the 'Skins preseason has been pretty, well, just straight up bad. I think it will take the skins a year to gel and get a feel for the coaches/ coaching styles and then be dominant once again.

2004 NFC East Standings

Eagles 13-3
Cowboys 10-6
Redskins 8-8
Giants 4-12