Sounds like you may have a little Snyder-dictator in you also.Burgundy&GoldForever wrote:No, he doesn't. That's just asinine thinking. How about a year out of football or on the bench behind Colt McCoy? How will that do for your next contract, Kirk?StorminMormon86 wrote:Yes it is. This is solely about what Cousins wants. The FO needs to put their big boy pants on and resign him. There are no two ways around it. And if Cousins doesn't want to be here, the FO need to trade him to get something in return besides a possible compensatory pick next year. Cousins holds all of the cards.Burgundy&GoldForever wrote:Half of me says "F Cousins" because it's not about what he wants.
But, no. Team owners have turned into gutless wonders who just roll over on command when a player is unhappy. Well, screw that and screw Cousins.
Here's what I'd do. Wait until every other team in the league has its QB situation set and then lift the tag. Piss on him.
You start McCoy with Cousins on the bench getting paid 24M????? The better QB..... That's just idiotic. And that would only make the organization look stupid, Cousin a martyr, and make it 100% certain that no free agent would ever come to DC for the next decade. Yeah, good plan......

THE BEATINGS WILL CONTINUE UNTIL MORALE IMPROVES!!!!!!!!
Oh --- and SF doesn't have their QB situation locked up; IMHO they have rented Hoyer for the specific purpose of signing Cousins next year. They are frontloading contracts (see Garcons) to free up space for next year.