HEROHAMO wrote:So much garbage from a benchwarmer probably waterboy. All I did was say that your opinions sucked and suggested you were unathletic. But you got butthurt and spewed out your true colors. I don't even know you but I must have hit some truth for you to respond in such a way.
Anytime anyone has anything negative to say about Kirks play you get butthurt. Yet all I have ever said about him was the truth.
I'll support any player who can bring a SuperBowl to this team.
I've said before that we should offer Kirk a contract just not as the highest paid player in NFL history.
Keeping Kirk with a reasonable contract would be smart and I've said that many times.
Your the one who can't face the possibility of this team losing Kirk for a couple draft picks.
I didn't create this situation moron! Kirk himself wants to get tagged!
So I advocate for the Skins to get as much compensation in the event that Kirk leaves and how is that stupid?
So the Gibbs era is over? Newsflash Gibbs is still the last coach to win a playoff game for this team. Even Gibbs 2.0 got us a playoff win. Gruden and Kirk still have not won a playoff game.
What exactly are you implying by Gibbs era is over?
If you mean a strong running game and good defense can't win championships anymore you're wrong.
Just watch what's going to happen in Dallas the next ten years. Dallas is going to lead the league in rushing and probably win a SuperBowl or two and dominate the league. With the same formula Gibbs started. What bothers me most is that Dallas basically copied what Gibbs did. Now Dallas is basically going to do it all over again.
Football is not complicated at all. Sorry to break it you. You get the most physically imposing front seven on both sides of the ball and you'll win 9 out of ten times.
You see I'm not your regular Redskins fan from D.C.
I come from Los Angeles. Lakers town. Ten plus championships. USC proud tradition of winning.
Not just you but many Skins fans especially young have become so used to the Snyder era of losing. So much so that when a mediocre Redskins team comes along they are satisfied. They are so fearful of returning to irrelevance that they will settle for the best in a long time even if it's not good enough.
You can call me whatever names you want doesn't bother me. I guess I started it.
If butthurt is wanting to correct you when you are consistently wrong ---- then yes, I'm butthurt. As far as "true colors" --- not sure what you mean. You got personal; I really didn't. I called you what you appear based on your post --- an @sshole. Even you said you started it..... You also said I was things that I'm not. I get more upset about falsehoods than truth. It's very easy to hide behind a keyboard and be tough. I don't deal with those types in reality, just places like this.
But I am unquestionably a Cousins fan and consistently accurate on this board. If you don't like my opinions, then you don't like reality or accuracy. That's on you. If you don't understand the game, oh well. The greatest flaw is not knowing what you don't know. It appears that is one of yours. I get "butthurt" when people make flawed and incorrect statements because they are butthurt RGIII fans, like yourself. I also agree when they are accurate --- as I did with your NYG assertion.
As far as your "opinions" -- your logic is consistent wrong and it's frustrating to read. DAL had a last place schedule. They got bounced in the first round. Then you spout how we haven't won playoff games as a reason for change ---- and we need to model our team off one.... that hasn't won playoff games. WTF???
Teams without QBs don't consistently win, no matter how good their RB or DEF is. If you don't understand that, then I feel sorry for you. You say you will only support players that can bring a SB to this franchise ---- yet you want to get rid of our most valuable one at the most valuable position and replace them with an inferior player that will absolutely not win a playoff game. You just don't make sense. Your logic is flawed --- unless you are saying our FO can assemble a DEF like the 2000 Ravens...... which is a joke on so many levels.
And football is complicated. Like, real complicated. Again --- you just don't know what you don't know. It is hard to explain something to someone that won't understand it. There are so many factors and determinables that need to be analyzed it's crazy. Front 7 is important, but that doesn't get you to a 90% winning percentage. Sorry. Not a chance. I have found in my profession that the underperformers are ones that oversimplify or think that things are easier than they are. The overperformers can make it sound simple, but understand all the complexities. I think you have listened to overperformers and took it at face value without realizing the complexity. Just a guess....
And yes, the Gibbs era of FOOTBALL is over. Sorry. You need a QB to be consistent. RBs have shorter lives (Riggins played was our leading rusher until he was 36 --- F&*$ing 36!!!). WRs have shorter lives (Monk was 36 when he left the skins). OLs and TEs get injured FAR more often. QBs are now the constant. Without them, you won't win CONSISTENTLY. And historically, a strong run game and DEF don't win SBs (since 1990, I'd say only 1 team -- 2000 BAL --- fits that description). If you don't get that, I can't help you.....
Now, I understand your sentiment if you believe Cousins should be signed to a fair deal --- roughly about 22-24M per year. But you don't sound like that is the case. And you are 100% in that I don't want to face the possibility of losing Cousins for a couple picks. That would be a horrible scenario. And I agree that if Cousins undeniably wants out, we have to get the most for him (as I have said previously). I just don't know if that is correct.
And oh man, LA. What a town.....
RIP Sean Taylor. You will be missed.
