Kaepernick Protests

[Countertrey]

^^^ I was not referring to gerrymandering and also I was very careful to write southern/swing states.

So no mention of gerrymandering and no limiting myself to the south.

No falsehood.

Really? WTH are you talking about?

I am talking about literally taking away voting rights for nefarious reasons. Pennsylvania and Ohio are not in the south but they are swing states.

If your name is Jose Garcia and you wait in line for 4 hours in Cleveland or Pittsburgh you may be challenged at the booth (all because there are other Jose Garcia's and you are likely to vote Democrat and you "look" immigrant-ish) and have no way to vote - even with good ID.

Gerrymandering is a manipulating of boundaries which I never mentioned.

You DO realize that Cleveland and Pittsburgh are Democrat controlled cities, right? All the more reason for Picture ID's at the polling place.

[Deadskins]

I am talking about literally taking away voting rights for nefarious reasons. Pennsylvania and Ohio are not in the south but they are swing states.

If your name is Jose Garcia and you wait in line for 4 hours in Cleveland or Pittsburgh you may be challenged at the booth (all because there are other Jose Garcia's and you are likely to vote Democrat and you "look" immigrant-ish) and have no way to vote - even with good ID.

Gerrymandering is a manipulating of boundaries which I never mentioned.

You DO realize that Cleveland and Pittsburgh are Democrat controlled cities, right? All the more reason for Picture ID's at the polling place.

Please! The whole voter fraud excuse for requiring photo IDs is based on total myth. https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/voter-fraud It is a thinly veiled attempt at disenfranchising minorities of their right to vote.

[DarthMonk]

You DO realize that Cleveland and Pittsburgh are Democrat controlled cities, right? All the more reason for Picture ID's at the polling place.

No falsehood in my original post - and yes, that is apparently the very reason the republicans are doing the nefarious things they are - because the people they want to prevent from exercising their right to vote mostly vote democrat.

RALEIGH, N.C. — The emails to the North Carolina election board seemed routine at the time.

“Is there any way to get a breakdown of the 2008 voter turnout, by race (white and black) and type of vote (early and Election Day)?” a staffer for the state’s Republican-controlled legislature asked in January 2012.

“Is there no category for ‘Hispanic’ voter?” a GOP lawmaker asked in March 2013 after requesting a range of data, including how many voters cast ballots outside their precinct.

And in April 2013, a top aide to the Republican House speaker asked for “a breakdown, by race, of those registered voters in your database that do not have a driver’s license number.”

Months later, the North Carolina legislature passed a law that cut a week of early voting, eliminated out-of-precinct voting and required voters to show specific types of photo ID — restrictions that election board data demonstrated would disproportionately affect African Americans and other minorities.

Critics dubbed it the “monster” law — a sprawling measure that stitched together various voting restrictions being tested in other states. As civil rights groups have sued to block the North Carolina law and others like it around the country, several thousand pages of documents have been produced under court order, revealing the details of how Republicans crafted these measures.

A review of these documents shows that North Carolina GOP leaders launched a meticulous and coordinated effort to deter black voters, who overwhelmingly vote for Democrats. The law, created and passed entirely by white legislators, evoked the state’s ugly history of blocking African Americans from voting — practices that had taken a civil rights movement and extensive federal intervention to stop.

Last month, a three-judge federal appeals panel struck down the North Carolina law, calling it “the most restrictive voting law North Carolina has seen since the era of Jim Crow.” Drawing from the emails and other evidence, the 83-page ruling charged that Republican lawmakers had targeted “African Americans with almost surgical precision.”

A much more unpatriotic act than kneeling or not putting one's hand over one's heart is to surgically deny the voting rights of minorities in several southern/swing states - an action from which many republicans seem to derive great glee.

Bastards

[Countertrey]

Meet Andrew Spieles Nefarious, indeed...