O'Dell "Josh Norman is only relevant because of me"

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Post Reply
Prowl33
Hog
Posts: 585
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:56 am
Contact:

O'Dell "Josh Norman is only relevant because of me"

Post by Prowl33 »

I'm sure most if not all of you have seen this, but just incase...

“If I wasn’t playing him twice a year, maybe people wouldn’t bring it up as much,” Beckham told GQ, via Complex. “But now it’ll be a lot more media attention for him, attention that I don’t really look for, attention I don’t really need. The reason that he’s become so relevant is because of me.”


I think O'Dell is giving himself a little too much credit, and is setting himself up to get physically and verbally punished for those 2 games this year.
User avatar
Burgundy&GoldForever
Hog
Posts: 3466
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:20 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Contact:

Re: O'Dell "Josh Norman is only relevant because of me"

Post by Burgundy&GoldForever »

Beckham is so wrong here Skip Bayless, of all people, corrected him:

Skip Bayless ‏@RealSkipBayless 4h4 hours ago

Odell Beckham Jr. says Josh Norman is more relevant "because of me." No, ODB is less relevant because Josh Norman sent him over the edge.
1,520 retweets 2,433 likes
“He was at that time the smartest player in the league. We did everything we could to try to eliminate him from the play. We knew if we didn’t neutralize him, then we had less of a chance of winning.” - John Hannah on Chris Hanburger
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Re: O'Dell "Josh Norman is only relevant because of me"

Post by Irn-Bru »

Burgundy&GoldForever wrote:Beckham is so wrong here Skip Bayless, of all people, corrected him:

Skip Bayless ‏@RealSkipBayless 4h4 hours ago

Odell Beckham Jr. says Josh Norman is more relevant "because of me." No, ODB is less relevant because Josh Norman sent him over the edge.
1,520 retweets 2,433 likes


Eh. As much as I don't like Beckham, he's probably the best, second best, or third best receiver in the league. Any time you find yourself agreeing with "Skip" Bayless it's time to check yourself . . .
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Re: O'Dell "Josh Norman is only relevant because of me"

Post by Irn-Bru »

The reason that he’s become so relevant is because of me.”


:roll:
User avatar
Burgundy&GoldForever
Hog
Posts: 3466
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:20 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Contact:

Re: O'Dell "Josh Norman is only relevant because of me"

Post by Burgundy&GoldForever »

Irn-Bru wrote:
Burgundy&GoldForever wrote:Beckham is so wrong here Skip Bayless, of all people, corrected him:

Skip Bayless ‏@RealSkipBayless 4h4 hours ago

Odell Beckham Jr. says Josh Norman is more relevant "because of me." No, ODB is less relevant because Josh Norman sent him over the edge.
1,520 retweets 2,433 likes


Eh. As much as I don't like Beckham, he's probably the best, second best, or third best receiver in the league. Any time you find yourself agreeing with "Skip" Bayless it's time to check yourself . . .


I don't agree with Skip Bayless even having a job in sports media but even a blind squirrel finds an occasional acorn.

Beckham's numbers went way down last season in several key measurables. He played three more games but only caught five more passes on twenty-eight more targets. His receptions per game dropped by a full reception from 7+ to 6+, his yards per game dropped by twelve from 108+ to 96+, and his catch percentage dropped by ten from 70+ to 60+.

That's one hell of a one year decline for a second year receiver.
“He was at that time the smartest player in the league. We did everything we could to try to eliminate him from the play. We knew if we didn’t neutralize him, then we had less of a chance of winning.” - John Hannah on Chris Hanburger
mastdark81
Hog
Posts: 916
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 7:21 pm

Re: O'Dell "Josh Norman is only relevant because of me"

Post by mastdark81 »

Says the guy that has never seen the NFL Playoffs. Josh Norman was just in the Super Bowl. In reality he's more relevant.
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Re: O'Dell "Josh Norman is only relevant because of me"

Post by Irn-Bru »

He's still relevant though, if somewhat less respected after he head-hunted Norman. He's one of the league's stars.
User avatar
Burgundy&GoldForever
Hog
Posts: 3466
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:20 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Contact:

Re: O'Dell "Josh Norman is only relevant because of me"

Post by Burgundy&GoldForever »

Irn-Bru wrote:He's still relevant though, if somewhat less respected after he head-hunted Norman. He's one of the league's stars.


He certainly makes highlight plays. If we're being honest most defenses aren't even straight man coverage. The cover two umbrella the Redskins use is designed to a) prevent the corner from getting beat deep and b) to force the receiver inside to a safety. Beckham beats a lot of corners and the Redskins haven't exactly prospered in the safety department in the last decade. I'd still bet on Norman to keep him under his six receptions for 96 yards and less than one touchdown per game average.
“He was at that time the smartest player in the league. We did everything we could to try to eliminate him from the play. We knew if we didn’t neutralize him, then we had less of a chance of winning.” - John Hannah on Chris Hanburger
KILO
piglet
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 12:48 am

Re: O'Dell "Josh Norman is only relevant because of me"

Post by KILO »

If relevance equates to shutting you down and making you look like a Buffon on the national stage, then yeah he's relevant because of you!!
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Re: O'Dell "Josh Norman is only relevant because of me"

Post by Countertrey »

mastdark81 wrote:Says the guy that has never seen the NFL Playoffs. Josh Norman was just in the Super Bowl. In reality he's more relevant.


And, then consider that a MAJOR reason Norman was just in the Super Bowl was because he OWNED poor Odell... and maintained his own composure at the same time that Beckham was getting physically stupid with no real consequences from the officials. I remember thinking, this is a player who knows what he is about... thrilled he is now a Redskin.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
Post Reply