The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Wanna talk about politics, your favorite hockey team... vegetarian recipes?
DEHog
Diesel
Diesel
Posts: 7425
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:03 pm
Location: FedEx Field
Contact:

Re: The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Post by DEHog »

Deadskins wrote:
Countertrey wrote:Ignorance of engineering and physics is all that's required to reach your conclusion... you can't see it, so... MAGIC!

That's laughable. I'd put my knowledge of physics up against anyone's on this board. I'd love to hear your theory on how the exit wound sprayed Kennedy's brain and skull all over the trunk of the car, when he was shot from the rear.

While he was shot from above through the rear of the right occipital, as the autopsy report explains a fragment from the projectile exited the parietal bone which could easily account for the brain matter and skull fragments on the rear of the vehicle.
"Sean Taylor is hands down the best athlete I've ever coached it's not even close" Gregg Williams 2005 Mini-Camp
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Re: The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Post by Countertrey »

Deadskins wrote:
Burgundy&GoldForever wrote:I've already explained the WTC collapse as detailed by a structural engineer familiar with the construction of the towers. All of the structural support was on the outside of the towers. The center of each tower was the elevator shafts, i.e. air space. The most likely point of collapse is at the weakest point.

You obviously don't understand what freefall speed means. Of course a structure will collapse at it weakest point, but that that doesn't mean there will be no resistance as it collapses. The pancaking floors explanation flies in the face of the laws of physics. To correct CT's statement, ignorance of engineering and physics is all that's required to accept the public narrative of the buildings collapsing at freefall speed.

Let's just pretend there wasn't a massive cloud of debris falling outside of the footprint, masking the collapse of the building... meaning you have no idea about the collapse rate of the structure... Image
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
User avatar
Burgundy&GoldForever
Hog
Posts: 3466
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:20 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Contact:

Re: The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Post by Burgundy&GoldForever »

Deadskins wrote:You obviously don't understand what freefall speed means. Of course a structure will collapse at it weakest point, but that that doesn't mean there will be no resistance as it collapses. The pancaking floors explanation flies in the face of the laws of physics. To correct CT's statement, ignorance of engineering and physics is all that's required to accept the public narrative of the buildings collapsing at freefall speed.


Just so we're clear:

The rate of acceleration when gravity is the only force acting upon an object is 9.8M/s/s. I'm going to take the liberty of assuming this is what you mean by "freefall."

http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/n ... Resistance

The problem is: Gravity was not the only force acting upon the object in question. Scroll down on that same link to see a detailed explanation of falling with air resistance.
“He was at that time the smartest player in the league. We did everything we could to try to eliminate him from the play. We knew if we didn’t neutralize him, then we had less of a chance of winning.” - John Hannah on Chris Hanburger
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Re: The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Post by Deadskins »

Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
User avatar
Burgundy&GoldForever
Hog
Posts: 3466
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:20 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Contact:

Re: The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Post by Burgundy&GoldForever »

Deadskins wrote:http://www.ae911truth.org/
http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/


I haven't even clicked on the links but, before I do, allow me to paraphrase the intellectual astrophysicist Dr. Neil DeGrasse Tyson:

"The great thing about science is that it's both provable and falsifiable, and therefore true whether you believe it or not."

I have an impending feeling of doom that whatever is contained in those links is a combination of logical fallacies which would argue otherwise.

Someone click on them and tell me if I'm close. 8-[
“He was at that time the smartest player in the league. We did everything we could to try to eliminate him from the play. We knew if we didn’t neutralize him, then we had less of a chance of winning.” - John Hannah on Chris Hanburger
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Re: The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Post by Countertrey »

Burgundy&GoldForever wrote:
Deadskins wrote:http://www.ae911truth.org/
http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/


I haven't even clicked on the links but, before I do, allow me to paraphrase the intellectual astrophysicist Dr. Neil DeGrasse Tyson:

"The great thing about science is that it's both provable and falsifiable, and therefore true whether you believe it or not."

I have an impending feeling of doom that whatever is contained in those links is a combination of logical fallacies which would argue otherwise.

Someone click on them and tell me if I'm close. 8-[
Clearly, it must be true... it's on the internets.
Brings us to the great paradox of our time...
"THERE WAS NO 9/11 conspiracy except for the crime committed by 19 terrorists... "

There... that's on the internets, too..
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Re: The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Post by Deadskins »

Burgundy&GoldForever wrote:
Deadskins wrote:http://www.ae911truth.org/
http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/


I haven't even clicked on the links but, before I do, allow me to paraphrase the intellectual astrophysicist Dr. Neil DeGrasse Tyson:

"The great thing about science is that it's both provable and falsifiable, and therefore true whether you believe it or not."

I have an impending feeling of doom that whatever is contained in those links is a combination of logical fallacies which would argue otherwise.

Someone click on them and tell me if I'm close. 8-[

Yes, why hear from actual architects, engineers, and scientists, and look at the evidence they present, when you can dismiss it out of hand, and continue to pull explanations out of your butt that defy the laws of physics?
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Re: The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Post by Deadskins »

Countertrey wrote:Clearly, it must be true... it's on the internets.

It'd be nice if these sites were just anonymous people posting conspiracy theories on the internet, like you wish were the case. Too bad that the signatories give their names and credentials that show them to be subject matter experts on science, engineering, and architecture. But hey, continue to bury your head in the sand. If you don't believe in something hard enough, then it can't be real. :roll:
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
User avatar
Burgundy&GoldForever
Hog
Posts: 3466
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:20 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Contact:

Re: The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Post by Burgundy&GoldForever »

Deadskins wrote:Yes, why hear from actual architects, engineers, and scientists, and look at the evidence they present, when you can dismiss it out of hand, and continue to pull explanations out of your butt that defy the laws of physics?


The first link says not two but three WTC towers collapsed on September 11th, 2001. And you expect me to keep reading? The second link is comprised of members of the first link.

How can anyone be expected to take anything these people say seriously when they begin with a statement which is falsifiable with empirical data?

I have hundreds of family members who live in New York. I'm pretty sure one of them would have noticed a third tower. Or caught it in one of their hundreds of photographs or videos.

Or one of the major media outlets would have when Air Force One flew a little too close to the towers for the FAA's comfort.

The thesis statement of their entire argument is there were three towers. Nothing they say beyond that point holds any credibility.
“He was at that time the smartest player in the league. We did everything we could to try to eliminate him from the play. We knew if we didn’t neutralize him, then we had less of a chance of winning.” - John Hannah on Chris Hanburger
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Re: The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Post by Deadskins »

Burgundy&GoldForever wrote:
Deadskins wrote:Yes, why hear from actual architects, engineers, and scientists, and look at the evidence they present, when you can dismiss it out of hand, and continue to pull explanations out of your butt that defy the laws of physics?


The first link says not two but three WTC towers collapsed on September 11th, 2001. And you expect me to keep reading? The second link is comprised of members of the first link.

How can anyone be expected to take anything these people say seriously when they begin with a statement which is falsifiable with empirical data?

I have hundreds of family members who live in New York. I'm pretty sure one of them would have noticed a third tower. Or caught it in one of their hundreds of photographs or videos.

Or one of the major media outlets would have when Air Force One flew a little too close to the towers for the FAA's comfort.

The thesis statement of their entire argument is there were three towers. Nothing they say beyond that point holds any credibility.

Yes, you obviously need to keep reading, because you didn't even know about WTC 7 coming down as well as 1 and 2. I guess you are not as informed as you thought you were. #-o
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Re: The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Post by Deadskins »

Burgundy&GoldForever wrote:
Deadskins wrote:Yes, why hear from actual architects, engineers, and scientists, and look at the evidence they present, when you can dismiss it out of hand, and continue to pull explanations out of your butt that defy the laws of physics?


The first link says not two but three WTC towers collapsed on September 11th, 2001. And you expect me to keep reading? The second link is comprised of members of the first link.

How can anyone be expected to take anything these people say seriously when they begin with a statement which is falsifiable with empirical data?

I have hundreds of family members who live in New York. I'm pretty sure one of them would have noticed a third tower. Or caught it in one of their hundreds of photographs or videos.

Or one of the major media outlets would have when Air Force One flew a little too close to the towers for the FAA's comfort.

The thesis statement of their entire argument is there were three towers. Nothing they say beyond that point holds any credibility.

Yes, you obviously need to keep reading, because you didn't even know about WTC 7 coming down, as well as 1 and 2. And, they did not use the word "towers," but rather "skyscrapers," probably because 7 WTC was taller than all the other buildings in the area (and would have been the tallest building in no less than 33 states), other than the two TOWERS. I guess you are not as informed as you thought you were. #-o :oops:
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Re: The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Post by Countertrey »

DS... do you not wonder why there is NOT ONE SINGLE Structural Engineer, Metalurgical Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, or Building Archetect, and ONLY ONE Civil Engineer in the bunch?????
Shouldn't that tell you something????

On the other hand, a Google or Bing search for "Engineers Explain WTC collapse" will yield pages of hits by both Engineers AND Architects... What a bunch of Morons, huh???
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Re: The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Post by Deadskins »

Countertrey wrote:DS... do you not wonder why there is NOT ONE SINGLE Structural Engineer, Metalurgical Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, or Building Archetect, and ONLY ONE Civil Engineer in the bunch?????

Say what? There are literally thousands of those at the first link (the ae stands for Architects and Engineers). Scroll not even halfway down the home page for the pictures and credentials of some of the most notable ones. Here's a pretty funny one:
Image
Richard Humenn, P.E., WTC Chief Electrical Engineer, Ret.

I realize he's only an Electrical Engineer, but he was the Chief at the WTC, so that's kind of interesting, don't you think?


The second link, I provided so that you could see that thousands of physicists also are willing to put there names and reputations behind the refutation of the absurd public narrative that those buildings were brought down by airplane strikes ~ the 90th floor.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
User avatar
Burgundy&GoldForever
Hog
Posts: 3466
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:20 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Contact:

Re: The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Post by Burgundy&GoldForever »

Deadskins wrote:Yes, you obviously need to keep reading, because you didn't even know about WTC 7 coming down, as well as 1 and 2. And, they did not use the word "towers," but rather "skyscrapers," probably because 7 WTC was taller than all the other buildings in the area (and would have been the tallest building in no less than 33 states), other than the two TOWERS. I guess you are not as informed as you thought you were. #-o :oops:


Where?

Image
“He was at that time the smartest player in the league. We did everything we could to try to eliminate him from the play. We knew if we didn’t neutralize him, then we had less of a chance of winning.” - John Hannah on Chris Hanburger
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Re: The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Post by Countertrey »

This is what it looked (and, more important, SOUNDED) like when the towers collapsed... Note that the collapse starts above the 90th floor... right where the plane hit... also note that THERE ARE NO explosions... You DO NOT hear the sequential explosions which are THE ONLY way to control a deliberate demolition of a tall building...
also note that the collapse begins right where the damage and fire is... EXPLOSIVES WILL NOT SURVIVE THIS FIRE... they simply become part of the fuel load.
North Tower

This is what it looks (and again, SOUJNDS like when explosives are used to bring down a tall building within it's own footprint... Note that immediately after the start of the collapse, THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE is shrouded in dust and smoke.
BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM Why is that important? Because there are explosive placed on EVERY floor, with the ones in the center of the building set to go off first, followed by those towards the outside of the building. This causes the building to collapse inward, resulting in it's falling within it's footprint. It requires months of planning, prep work (removing components of the building, drilling holes into the concrete, running wiring, placing explosives. It is loud, messy, intrusive work. As demonstrated by the 1991 basement bombing of the WTC, you can't simply park an explosive and get the result above.

You're going to believe what you want... fantasy.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
welch
Skins History Buff
Skins History Buff
Posts: 6000
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: The black eye of the Dallas Cowboys

Post by welch »

Countertrey wrote:This is what it looked (and, more important, SOUNDED) like when the towers collapsed... Note that the collapse starts above the 90th floor... right where the plane hit... also note that THERE ARE NO explosions... You DO NOT hear the sequential explosions which are THE ONLY way to control a deliberate demolition of a tall building...
also note that the collapse begins right where the damage and fire is... EXPLOSIVES WILL NOT SURVIVE THIS FIRE... they simply become part of the fuel load.
North Tower

This is what it looks (and again, SOUJNDS like when explosives are used to bring down a tall building within it's own footprint... Note that immediately after the start of the collapse, THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE is shrouded in dust and smoke.
BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM Why is that important? Because there are explosive placed on EVERY floor, with the ones in the center of the building set to go off first, followed by those towards the outside of the building. This causes the building to collapse inward, resulting in it's falling within it's footprint. It requires months of planning, prep work (removing components of the building, drilling holes into the concrete, running wiring, placing explosives. It is loud, messy, intrusive work. As demonstrated by the 1991 basement bombing of the WTC, you can't simply park an explosive and get the result above.

You're going to believe what you want... fantasy.


Yes. CT has got it right. I'll add, having worked at 1 WTC from '86 - '90 and visited customers clean through 2001:

- 7 WTC, earlier the HQ for Salomon Brothers, was about 40 stories...a big building, but less than half as high as the two towers. It was across the street, just north of the WTC plaza...which had a Marriott Hotel and several shorter buildings. Mayor Giuliani had his emergency office there, complete with diesel generators and fuel tanks to keep the Mayor's team with electricity for several days...just in case. 7 WTC was hit by flaming debris from 1 WTC and maybe some by 2 WTC. 7 WTC caught fire, and when the fires hit the diesel fuel, it blew up. The building had been evacuated by then -- the afternoon of September 11 -- because the Fured Department knew what would happen when flames met diesel fuel. Flaming debris also hit the east side of Church Street, landing on trees in the cemetary for St Paul's Chapel. The trees were still green (early September) and the cemetary was farther away from 1 WTC.

- The first plane hit 1 WTC ("the north tower") about the 86th floor. I had worked on the 81st floor, which had become the Bank of Taiwan's floor. I paid attention: everyone from the bank got out. (I met a woman from the bank when she came to our office a few weeks later). No one survived above 86.

- The second plane hit 2 WTC about the 78th floor. Nearly everyone died above 78...might have been one stairway open, but I don't remember...it's been 15 years.

- People in my office saw the second plane hit. People in an upper floor of our building -- the MetLife Building -- heard the second plane and watched it.

- That a group might have planted explosives up and down both buildings without being noticed? A wacky idea. You needed an ID to get into the buildings. Imagine the discussion:

WTC security guards: "What are you dragging into the building and why?"
Conspirators: "Oh, this is just a couple hundred pounds of explosives and some fancy gear to blow it up".

- The conspiracy theories require that all WTC security plus senior members of the NYPD are incompetent, corrupt, or suicidal. Every one of them?

- The 9/11 hijackings required money, and large amounts. Any money -- anything more than the tiny amounts carried by Western Union -- entering the US has to come through SWIFT (see swift.com). It should have been possible to track money from the hijackers' accounts back to whoever financed -- and directed -- them. Sure enough, investigators did that, as reported in the NY Times in 2006. The money came from Al Qaeda. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/23/washi ... intel.html
Post Reply