riggofan wrote:That's true. I guess I would be curious though to know how big of a problem it is. How many of those players in the current system are vastly outplaying their rookie contract. I kind of doubt its that big a number.
IMHO, if it's just one player, it's an issue. I like to see people be rewarded for their hard work.
riggofan wrote:But doesn't that just open up the problem of holdouts that they just fixed?
I understand that it'd create new issues. I'm just looking at this from the human perspective, not as a fan. As a man, I'd like to see another person be rewarded for their efforts. I'd like to see them paid what they're worth. I take the same stance for my coworkers and people with whom I can champion for to get raises. I hate seeing good people get looked over.
riggofan wrote:I do get what you're saying though. Its not a great deal for the rookies and heavily favors the owners. But the players didn't have the willpower and leverage to negotiate a better deal last time, and that wasn't just all about the NFLPA leadership. That was about veteran players being unwilling to strike for long and lose their paychecks. They were unwilling to hold out for a better deal for young players who weren't even in the NFL yet.
Yeah. The owners took advantage of the players inability to be financially sound and their greed. The players picked poor leadership. The players got what they deserved.
riggofan wrote:I will say the pay scale for first round rookies is more fair. A good compromise might be to allow new contracts/negotiations for some of those late round players earlier.
Yep. I totally agree.
riggofan wrote:Good point about treating certain positions differently btw.
Yeah. Alfred is gonna get screwed pretty badly if he gets injured. I'd hate to see that.