Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by SkinsJock »

I can't imagine Dan having no contact with his players but he should understand how harmful it is for it to be more than just a very occasional 'dinner'

I don't think that it's only 1 or 2 'meetings' but we do not know that ..... you can imagine how blown up any meeting is when the DC media is involved
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
PulpExposure
Pushing Paper
Pushing Paper
Posts: 4860
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 3:01 pm

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by PulpExposure »

SkinsJock wrote:I can't imagine Dan having no contact with his players but he should understand how harmful it is for it to be more than just a very occasional 'dinner'

I don't think that it's only 1 or 2 'meetings' but we do not know that ..... you can imagine how blown up any meeting is when the DC media is involved


I do agree with your thought in general, but I don't actually think that applies here.

All we have about the whole RG3-Snyder "influence" story is a lot of Sally. That is, based on rumors and wholly unproven. I can't point to a single time where Shanahan made a call, was overruled by when RG3 used his "influence" with Snyder. It may have happened, but we don't know about it.

However, we do know one instance where influence wasn't seen. Shanahan benched RG3. RG3 clearly didn't agree with this, and if he truly had influence, he would have gone to Snyder and wouldn't have been benched...
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by SkinsJock »

PulpExposure wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:I can't imagine Dan having no contact with his players but he should understand how harmful it is for it to be more than just an occasional 'dinner' - I don't think that it's only 1 or 2 'meetings' - we do not know that, you can imagine how blown up any meeting is when the DC media is involved


I do agree with your thought in general, but I don't actually think that applies here.

All we have about the whole RG3-Snyder "influence" story is a lot of Sally. That is, based on rumors and wholly unproven.
I can't point to a single time where Shanahan made a call, was overruled by when RG3 used his "influence" with Snyder. It may have happened, but we don't know about it.

However, we do know one instance where influence wasn't seen. Shanahan benched RG3. RG3 clearly didn't agree with this, and if he truly had influence, he would have gone to Snyder and wouldn't have been benched...

I don't know why you think that RG3 had any 'influence' - if that was in the article, it's almost certainly complete BS - I do not read trash

nobody with any sense thinks that RG3 had any 'influence' with what happened here - NOBODY

I do not think that Dan Snyder should have ZERO contact with his players - he just has to be very careful about it is all

nobody really knows if the contact between RG3 and Snyder was more than a casual dinner or 2
the only issue might have been if his tam mates or his coaches felt that there was more between them than there actually was - THAT is a huge problem

it's a matter of trust between players and between players and coaches and if that was compromised by Dan Snyder then that is BS

that is what I'm referring to - no HC can be successful if he is not trusted and does not trust his players

IMO - Dan Snyder made that happen and made it impossible for things to work here

Mike did make Dan Snyder give up control and that is a good thing as long as Snyder stays away from interfering with the players and coaches
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
User avatar
riggofan
HereComesTheDiesel
HereComesTheDiesel
Posts: 9460
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:29 pm
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by riggofan »

SkinsJock wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:I can't imagine Dan having no contact with his players but he should understand how harmful it is for it to be more than just an occasional 'dinner' - I don't think that it's only 1 or 2 'meetings' - we do not know that, you can imagine how blown up any meeting is when the DC media is involved


I do agree with your thought in general, but I don't actually think that applies here.

All we have about the whole RG3-Snyder "influence" story is a lot of Sally. That is, based on rumors and wholly unproven.
I can't point to a single time where Shanahan made a call, was overruled by when RG3 used his "influence" with Snyder. It may have happened, but we don't know about it.

However, we do know one instance where influence wasn't seen. Shanahan benched RG3. RG3 clearly didn't agree with this, and if he truly had influence, he would have gone to Snyder and wouldn't have been benched...


I don't know why you think that RG3 had any 'influence' - if that was in the article, it's almost certainly complete BS - I do not read trash


I think you misread his post. He is writing that Jenkins didn't show any evidence of RGIII influence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"You can't do epic **** with basic people." - DJax
"We're on the rise, man, whether you're on the train or not." - Josh Norman
DaSkinz Baby
Hog
Posts: 641
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:25 pm
Location: Clarksburg

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by DaSkinz Baby »

PulpExposure wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:I can't imagine Dan having no contact with his players but he should understand how harmful it is for it to be more than just a very occasional 'dinner'

I don't think that it's only 1 or 2 'meetings' but we do not know that ..... you can imagine how blown up any meeting is when the DC media is involved


I do agree with your thought in general, but I don't actually think that applies here.

All we have about the whole RG3-Snyder "influence" story is a lot of Sally. That is, based on rumors and wholly unproven. I can't point to a single time where Shanahan made a call, was overruled by when RG3 used his "influence" with Snyder. It may have happened, but we don't know about it.

However, we do know one instance where influence wasn't seen. Shanahan benched RG3. RG3 clearly didn't agree with this, and if he truly had influence, he would have gone to Snyder and wouldn't have been benched...


I agree with your assessment 100%. It's widely known that Sally among others live to make drama and assumption in all articles regarding the Redskins. As bas a Snyder has been in the past, if and when, if it hasn't already, once that "light" comes on and we go back to being the powerhouse we once were, then maybe would he get some positive press. Until then, he will be written about and the unending "sources" these media people have will always give some "insight" I think based upon the 1 year Snyder gave to Shottenheimer in comparison to Shanahan, I would think he has matured. We just need the right HC to come in here and inspire this team and have a offense that will allow RGIII to become that elite QB. We also need a DC in here that will make this a good defense again. I only hope and pray that it comes soon!!
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

3 Things immediately come to mind...


1. The media in this town are a bunch of savages, desperate for drama. Hell, Lovero was on ESPN980 admitting to it 30 minutes ago. He wants Art Briles here because it'd bring a circus and that's good business. The same papers that seek out political scandal are using the same lenses to frame most of their reporting.

2. Snyder does himself almost zero favors by being meddlesome.

3. The fans can't think for themselves. They consume media and believe everything written, even when articles from the same publication contradict themselves...


So really, Snyder is in a lose/lose situation. This isn't the franchise he grew up with, partly because he's made it worse and partly because media is different. All he can do is completely remove himself from the picture. The owner of the SeaHawks, haven't seen that man in years. Snyder wants to be remain visible, so that he can be there to prove people wrong, so that he can say, I did it my way. Well...
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by SkinsJock »

Chris Luva Luva wrote:3 Things immediately come to mind...

1. The media in this town are a bunch of savages, desperate for drama. Hell, Lovero was on ESPN980 admitting to it 30 minutes ago. He wants Art Briles here because it'd bring a circus and that's good business. The same papers that seek out political scandal are using the same lenses to frame most of their reporting.

2. Snyder does himself almost zero favors by being meddlesome.

3. The fans can't think for themselves. They consume media and believe everything written, even when articles from the same publication contradict themselves...

So really, Snyder is in a lose/lose situation. This isn't the franchise he grew up with, partly because he's made it worse and partly because media is different. All he can do is completely remove himself from the picture. Snyder wants to be remain visible, so that he can be there to prove people wrong, so that he can say, I did it my way.


THANK YOU - spot on ...
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
DaSkinz Baby
Hog
Posts: 641
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:25 pm
Location: Clarksburg

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by DaSkinz Baby »

Chris Luva Luva wrote:3 Things immediately come to mind...


1. The media in this town are a bunch of savages, desperate for drama. Hell, Lovero was on ESPN980 admitting to it 30 minutes ago. He wants Art Briles here because it'd bring a circus and that's good business. The same papers that seek out political scandal are using the same lenses to frame most of their reporting.

2. Snyder does himself almost zero favors by being meddlesome.

3. The fans can't think for themselves. They consume media and believe everything written, even when articles from the same publication contradict themselves...


So really, Snyder is in a lose/lose situation. This isn't the franchise he grew up with, partly because he's made it worse and partly because media is different. All he can do is completely remove himself from the picture. The owner of the SeaHawks, haven't seen that man in years. Snyder wants to be remain visible, so that he can be there to prove people wrong, so that he can say, I did it my way. Well...


Agree however we all are missing the point, as long as he is running the bank making millions in profit, opinion number 2 is a moot point....Let FedEx Field go empty a whole season and no one buy any Redskins gear, I wonder what changes would then be made :lol: :lol:
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

DaSkinz Baby wrote:Agree however we all are missing the point, as long as he is running the bank making millions in profit, opinion number 2 is a moot point....Let FedEx Field go empty a whole season and no one buy any Redskins gear, I wonder what changes would then be made :lol: :lol:


Within the context of that post, it's not a moot point. A moot point is coming up with a hypothetical situation that will NEVER happen. We're talking public perception/media.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
PulpExposure
Pushing Paper
Pushing Paper
Posts: 4860
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 3:01 pm

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by PulpExposure »

SkinsJock wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:I can't imagine Dan having no contact with his players but he should understand how harmful it is for it to be more than just an occasional 'dinner' - I don't think that it's only 1 or 2 'meetings' - we do not know that, you can imagine how blown up any meeting is when the DC media is involved


I do agree with your thought in general, but I don't actually think that applies here.

All we have about the whole RG3-Snyder "influence" story is a lot of Sally. That is, based on rumors and wholly unproven.
I can't point to a single time where Shanahan made a call, was overruled by when RG3 used his "influence" with Snyder. It may have happened, but we don't know about it.

However, we do know one instance where influence wasn't seen. Shanahan benched RG3. RG3 clearly didn't agree with this, and if he truly had influence, he would have gone to Snyder and wouldn't have been benched...

I don't know why you think that RG3 had any 'influence' - if that was in the article, it's almost certainly complete BS - I do not read trash

nobody with any sense thinks that RG3 had any 'influence' with what happened here - NOBODY

I do not think that Dan Snyder should have ZERO contact with his players - he just has to be very careful about it is all

nobody really knows if the contact between RG3 and Snyder was more than a casual dinner or 2
the only issue might have been if his tam mates or his coaches felt that there was more between them than there actually was - THAT is a huge problem

it's a matter of trust between players and between players and coaches and if that was compromised by Dan Snyder then that is BS

that is what I'm referring to - no HC can be successful if he is not trusted and does not trust his players

IMO - Dan Snyder made that happen and made it impossible for things to work here

Mike did make Dan Snyder give up control and that is a good thing as long as Snyder stays away from interfering with the players and coaches


If there's no influence being had, why is it a problem to have contact with players? The problem is the Portis issue; it's when a player actually gets some measure of control they shouldn't have and can influence decisions made by the coach by using the owner. That's when the coach can't trust the player or owner, because he thinks the player is going behind his back to influence the owner. Why else would owner-player contact be a problem?
langleyparkjoe
**LPJ**
**LPJ**
Posts: 6714
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
Contact:

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by langleyparkjoe »

DaSkinz Baby wrote:....Let FedEx Field go empty a whole season and no one buy any Redskins gear, I wonder what changes would then be made :lol: :lol:


Not even gonna front, I can't do it. As ticked off as I still am, I won't lie to you bro, I just can't do it. 8-[
Hog Bowl Champions
'09 & '17 langleyparkjoe, '10 Cappster, '11 & '13 DarthMonk,
'12 Deadskins, '14 PickSixerTWSS, '15 APEX PREDATOR, '16 vwoodzpusha
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

langleyparkjoe wrote:
DaSkinz Baby wrote:....Let FedEx Field go empty a whole season and no one buy any Redskins gear, I wonder what changes would then be made :lol: :lol:


Not even gonna front, I can't do it. As ticked off as I still am, I won't lie to you bro, I just can't do it. 8-[


Ur right. It won't happen. But I've done it. No gear, zero attendance. And I"m damn close to not watching the games on TV either.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
langleyparkjoe
**LPJ**
**LPJ**
Posts: 6714
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
Contact:

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by langleyparkjoe »

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
langleyparkjoe wrote:
DaSkinz Baby wrote:....Let FedEx Field go empty a whole season and no one buy any Redskins gear, I wonder what changes would then be made :lol: :lol:


Not even gonna front, I can't do it. As ticked off as I still am, I won't lie to you bro, I just can't do it. 8-[


Ur right. It won't happen. But I've done it. No gear, zero attendance. And I"m damn close to not watching the games on TV either.


After that cow game I said I'm done CLL. I just never have the willpower/discipline to follow through
Hog Bowl Champions
'09 & '17 langleyparkjoe, '10 Cappster, '11 & '13 DarthMonk,
'12 Deadskins, '14 PickSixerTWSS, '15 APEX PREDATOR, '16 vwoodzpusha
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by SkinsJock »

Chris Luva Luva wrote: ... Ur right. It won't happen. But I've done it. No gear, zero attendance. And I"m damn close to not watching the games on TV either.


I am getting very tired of Dan Snyder forcing us to always be looking ahead to next season ...

I will promise this - if Dan Snyder screws with this franchise AGAIN by not allowing this FO (and the new guys coming in) to do their jobs ... I am gone

and I have 4 season tickets ... sec 205 - row 3 - seats 14 - 17
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by Deadskins »

riggofan wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:I agree with you except that no HC can have the authority he needs if RG3 and Dan Snyder are 'friends'


Totally agree, man. That's exactly what I was getting at when I said "appropriate" contact. There is that story about Snyder having Thanksgiving dinner with RGIII, not sure that qualifies as "appropriate". Forget about undermining the coach, I think stuff like that does RGIII no favors with his teammates.

If it were a close competition between RGIII and Cousins, then contact between Snyder and RGIII might undermine the coach, but since he's the unquestioned starter, I really don't see the issue. I don't think the Danny is trying to coach him up. He's just a jock sniffer who likes to say he is friends with an athlete.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
masterkwon
piggie
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 6:13 pm

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by masterkwon »

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/three-reas ... MA3ClNbK5_

After holding the title for two decades, Tiny needs to send Haslam a Thank you card.
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by Countertrey »

DaSkinz Baby wrote: I said and will always say without Elway Shanahan wouldn't have won NOTHING! Elway made Shanahan not the other way around. Why do you think Shanahan hasn't done nothing since Elway retired?? That my friend isn't rocket science......... :mrgreen: :mrgreen:



Hmmm... so, maybe you can remind me... Exactly how many Superbowls did Elway win before Shanahan got there? [-(
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by Deadskins »

Countertrey wrote:
DaSkinz Baby wrote: I said and will always say without Elway Shanahan wouldn't have won NOTHING! Elway made Shanahan not the other way around. Why do you think Shanahan hasn't done nothing since Elway retired?? That my friend isn't rocket science......... :mrgreen: :mrgreen:



Hmmm... so, maybe you can remind me... Exactly how many Superbowls did Elway win before Shanahan got there? [-(

Sorry guys, but neither would have won anything without Terrell Davis.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
DaSkinz Baby
Hog
Posts: 641
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:25 pm
Location: Clarksburg

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by DaSkinz Baby »

Countertrey wrote:
DaSkinz Baby wrote: I said and will always say without Elway Shanahan wouldn't have won NOTHING! Elway made Shanahan not the other way around. Why do you think Shanahan hasn't done nothing since Elway retired?? That my friend isn't rocket science......... :mrgreen: :mrgreen:



Hmmm... so, maybe you can remind me... Exactly how many Superbowls did Elway win before Shanahan got there? [-(


I see where Elway is now, has his team going to the super bowl. Where is Shanahan, back at his steak restaurant? =D> =D> You can believe what you want. Elway won when he was able too and when he had the pieces. The same can be said for when Barry took over Johnson's team in Dallas! Shanahan isn't nothing and was always lucky being in the right place at the right time, when it came to doing it on his own....We see the results. Jim Zorn like stats........Screw him...Glad he is gone!! PERIOD.
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by SkinsJock »

Deadskins wrote:
riggofan wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:I agree with you except that no HC can have the authority he needs if RG3 and Dan Snyder are 'friends'


Totally agree, man. That's exactly what I was getting at when I said "appropriate" contact. There is that story about Snyder having Thanksgiving dinner with RGIII, not sure that qualifies as "appropriate". Forget about undermining the coach, I think stuff like that does RGIII no favors with his teammates.

If it were a close competition between RGIII and Cousins, then contact between Snyder and RGIII might undermine the coach, but since he's the unquestioned starter, I really don't see the issue. I don't think the Danny is trying to coach him up. He's just a jock sniffer who likes to say he is friends with an athlete.


You and I disagree on this if you think that RG3's offensive team mates have no issue with the perception that RG3 and Snyder discuss what happens on the field

but then again - you have an issue with just about everything ... :twisted:
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by SkinsJock »

I will have no problem with Dan Snyder when I see a consistently competitive product on the field ...

that is not happening here in the near future and that is primarily due to Dan Snyder ... :roll:
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
User avatar
OldSchool
Hog
Posts: 1030
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Wash Post: the Skins continue to lose w/Snyder

Post by OldSchool »

I am not renewing my seats because I've reached the conclusion winning games is not Snyder's top priority, it's generating revenue.
Post Reply