we do have 2 good QBs and they're BOTH only going to get better

some fans like Griffin, some like Cousins - then there are a bunch of low life, pseudo fans that cannot see straight and wish for everything to be as bad as it can be
OldSchool wrote:I don't get "the comparison is not fair" logic. It's not fair to compare the actual performances of Cousins and Griffin? You apparently think a more relevant comparison is between the actual Cousins and a theoretical future Griffin who has learned how to read defenses, change protections, quickly go through progressions, make the right choice and deliver the ball accurately.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.
DaSkinz Baby wrote:StorminMormon86 wrote:People also need to realize that Griffin played aganist worse defenses than Atlanta, and looked a lot worse than Cousins. Cousins proved how effective our offense can be when its run correctly. And stop with the 2 INTS nonsense. Morris fumbled the ball twice, Moss once (and the muffed punt return)...so it's not all on Cousins with the turnovers. Add on the fact that it was his first full week of practice, I'm not all that surprised that he threw picks.
I can't believe the people who keep praising Cousins when we lost the game to the worst defense/team in the league.
When Cousins gets sacked and fumbles, its the lines fault. When RG3 gets sacked and fumbles it's his fault because he could not avoid the sack due to his newly constructed knee.
When Cousins throws 2 interceptions its overlooked, but when RG3 throws an interception its he can't read the defense.
Stop the madness and stop turning a blind eye to your hypocrisy. Something is not right and honestly it's nothing to do with either RG3 or Kirk Cousins. It's the entire team!!!!!
DaSkinz Baby wrote:I can't believe the people who keep praising Cousins when we lost the game to the worst defense/team in the league.
DaSkinz Baby wrote:When Cousins gets sacked and fumbles, its the lines fault. When RG3 gets sacked and fumbles it's his fault because he could not avoid the sack due to his newly constructed knee.
DaSkinz Baby wrote:When Cousins throws 2 interceptions its overlooked, but when RG3 throws an interception its he can't read the defense.
DaSkinz Baby wrote:Stop the madness and stop turning a blind eye to your hypocrisy. Something is not right and honestly it's nothing to do with either RG3 or Kirk Cousins. It's the entire team!!!!!
StorminMormon86 wrote:DaSkinz Baby wrote:I can't believe the people who keep praising Cousins when we lost the game to the worst defense/team in the league.
We lost games to worse passing defenses when Griffin started.DaSkinz Baby wrote:When Cousins gets sacked and fumbles, its the lines fault. When RG3 gets sacked and fumbles it's his fault because he could not avoid the sack due to his newly constructed knee.
Look at the amount of sacks Griffin had over the past 4 weeks compared to what Cousins had yesterday. Did our o-line look "putrid" yesterday? Not at all.DaSkinz Baby wrote:When Cousins throws 2 interceptions its overlooked, but when RG3 throws an interception its he can't read the defense.
Cousins also had his first full week of practice this week and it was only his 2nd career game started. Of course the INTs are going to be overlooked. The same thing gets done when Griffin throws picks. He gets even more of a pass on just about everything he does wrong.DaSkinz Baby wrote:Stop the madness and stop turning a blind eye to your hypocrisy. Something is not right and honestly it's nothing to do with either RG3 or Kirk Cousins. It's the entire team!!!!!
I agree our whole team is bad. But at least our offense looked competitive yesterday.
StorminMormon86 wrote:People also need to realize that Griffin played aganist worse defenses than Atlanta, and looked a lot worse than Cousins. Cousins proved how effective our offense can be when its run correctly. And stop with the 2 INTS nonsense. Morris fumbled the ball twice, Moss once (and the muffed punt return)...so it's not all on Cousins with the turnovers. Add on the fact that it was his first full week of practice, I'm not all that surprised that he threw picks.
riggofan wrote:StorminMormon86 wrote:People also need to realize that Griffin played aganist worse defenses than Atlanta, and looked a lot worse than Cousins. Cousins proved how effective our offense can be when its run correctly. And stop with the 2 INTS nonsense. Morris fumbled the ball twice, Moss once (and the muffed punt return)...so it's not all on Cousins with the turnovers. Add on the fact that it was his first full week of practice, I'm not all that surprised that he threw picks.
You've got to be freaking kidding me. Atlanta is the 29th ranked defense in the league. They generated no pass rush and started three rookies in the secondary.
I really liked the way Cousins played for the most part yesterday, but his INTs were awful. I just like him in general. His post game comments were really smart, and you can tell he has good leadership qualities. He seems like a guy who can be successful.
All of these comments making judgements on him after one game against a TERRIBLE team are just ridiculous though. Give it a rest people.
oj wrote:Countertrey wrote:The comparison is not accurate...
Cousins came to the Redskins as a polished pro-style quarterback. He's been developed as a pocket passer for 10 years.
Where is the 10year professional experience?
riggofan wrote:You've got to be freaking kidding me. Atlanta is the 29th ranked defense in the league. They generated no pass rush and started three rookies in the secondary.
DaSkinz Baby wrote:For all you so called Redskins fans out there, saying Cousins is better than RGIII need to stop it. You were all singing RGIII's praise last year as he won us the Division. If you know anything about football, it should be crystal clear why Cousin's had a good game. 1. The play calling was completely different than when RGIII is in the game. How many times did you see the pistol formation? Zero! Kyle called 1 back sets, which gives you better protection. For those who don't know, in the pistol, you have less blocking and more receivers and you're more exposed as a qb. In a 1 back set, you have more protection and less receivers, thus making your progression reads a lot easier. 2. As you already know, the Falcons, Cowboys, & Giants all have subpar defenses. It is to be expected that Cousin's should have a good day. Exotic blitz packages will not be run by these next opponents, so there won't be much to worry about.
StorminMormon86 wrote:riggofan wrote:You've got to be freaking kidding me. Atlanta is the 29th ranked defense in the league. They generated no pass rush and started three rookies in the secondary.
You're wrong. They're the 24th ranked defense against the pass in the league. The Vikings, Eagles, and Cowboys are all worse and we lost to each of those teams. Does Cousins not deserve kudos based off of the fact that the Falcons are one of the worst defenses in the league? Absolutely not. It was only the 2nd game in his career! It amazes me how much this fanbase is divided.
Kilmer72 wrote:I'm afraid you are wasting your time Riggofan
riggofan wrote:I completely agree that he deserves "kudos" whatever that is for playing pretty well yesterday. I really like Cousins and thought he played really well for the most part. Its not a question of liking RGIII more or the fanbase being divided. Its a question of fans making ridiculous pronouncements about Cousins v. RGIII after one incredibly meaningless game against a terrible team. The Falcons are ranked 24th against the pass not just 29th in overall defense??? Who gives a flying fart? They are TERRIBLE. They allow 31 points per game. Its an embarrassment that we lost to them. How sad it is that we gave up seven turnovers, lost to this atrocious team and we're talking about how well Kirk Cousins played?
Say what you will about the Vikings, Eagles and Cowboys. The Eagles and Cowboys are both in playoff contention. The Vikings just beat Philly, Chicago and came close to beating Baltimore and Green Bay. Sorry, but we're not all idiots who would believe your statement that the Falcons are better than ANY of those teams. Frankly, the only team worse than Atlanta is the Washington Redskins.
I would love to visit this website today and talk about how well Cousins played. Unfortunately, I log in and have to read dumb*** comments like "Kirk Cousins is clearly far ahead of RGIII in his development as a QB". I knew it was coming, but its no less irritating to watch it happen exactly as we all expected.
StorminMormon86 wrote:I get what you're saying and I agree for the most part. Griffin played medicore to sub-par in the majority of the games this year. But when he played well (against Chargers, Vikings, Giants) why were there no posts about how it should be expected because those teams defenses suck? It was all about Griffin coming back to his old self. Cousins has a good game and it's just because the defense sucked.
riggofan wrote:StorminMormon86 wrote:I get what you're saying and I agree for the most part. Griffin played medicore to sub-par in the majority of the games this year. But when he played well (against Chargers, Vikings, Giants) why were there no posts about how it should be expected because those teams defenses suck? It was all about Griffin coming back to his old self. Cousins has a good game and it's just because the defense sucked.
Well, the Chargers just beat the Broncos didn't they? I'm not really sure how bad their defense sucks either.![]()
I hear what you're saying though, I'm just not sure I agree that there has been a lot of RGIII rah rah stuff. Those were bad losses to the Vikings and Giants. I don't remember people pointing out how great RGIII played in either game to be honest.
Kilmer72 wrote:In fairness, I might have been one of the few that described Roberts game (Giants) as being much like his old self. There was a lot of dropped balls that were right in the bread basket.