Chris Luva Luva wrote:The defense was really bad, but I swear a lot of yall would drink RGIII's bathwater if he asked you to.
If he isn't 100%, he shouldn't be on the field. He does NOT get a pass for rushing back and holding the offense back. Giving all of his 80% or whatever his health really is, isn't good enough and he doesn't deserve a pat on the back for it. Kirk Cousins should be our starting QB if Robert cannot help this team win.
As far as the defense is concerned.
- Fletcher is 1000 years old.
- Meriweather is still fragile.
- Hall is Hall.
- Doughty is Doughty.
- Rambo is a 6th round pick, despite the kool-aid we all choose to drink. He showed his true colors in the preseason.
- Amerson is a rookie but looks decent.
All that being said, they are who we knew them to be. With the CAP ramification and lack of picks to get RGIII, why did people think they were magically going to turn into a top 5 defense? People are talking about the Steelers and the Ravens, teams with multiple HOF players on them.... We have one and he didn't accumulate that resume mainly from being a Redskin.
And honestly, the defense could have had 4 interceptions in the 1st half and the offense would have done exactly jack-sh** with it. But I'm sure someone would have expected 4 more and complained that we didn't get 8.
Our offense scored three TDS. Teams just dont give away TDS. Each and every point in this league is earned. Like I said our offense isnt firing on all cyclinders. Yet our offense still managed to put up points. Defenses love to get shutouts if they have the option. No way I am buying the argument that teams played soft on us. When a team plays prevent they are trying to cover the long ball and quick scores. If an opposing offense poses no threat of quick scores there is no need to play a prevent against such an offense.
You can slice it however you want but our offense put up three TDs in each game. Had our defense put up a fight it would have been a close game.
I expect this defense to be top ten. We have the talent so I expect more.
Haslett from the time he has arrived until now. Still he has failed to show significant progress. Like I said our offense has shown improvement. Yet our defense is still a work in progress? You cant excuse that. He has had four years to prepare. Especially now that Haslett has talent to work with.
Haslett fails to put our players in the best possible situation to succeed. He is always one step behind. He is playing checkers while the opposing offense is playing chess.
My analysis for what its worth. I think this defense could be top ten with the current talent. If we use the players we have correctly.
CBs Amerson and Hall. Amerson has shown he can play. He is big fast and physical. More man to man coverage. Hall can still cover same with him more man to man. Use Halls aggressiveness, play to his strengths. Bump and run more man to man coverage.
Reed Doughtys strength is his tackling and being in the right position. Use him more around the line of schrimmage.
Merriwhether was playing well until he got hurt. He is injury prone. Need him to stay on the field.
More man to man coverage. Its a copycat league. We have the defensive players to run a scheme like Seattle. Seattle and the Forty Niners run a heavy man to man coverage with the four down lineman going after the QB. Mixed in with blitzes.
Perry Riley and London Fletcher. Riley has shown he can get to the QB. Utilize this. Fletcher is old but he can still play. Use him right.
It all points to Haslett being terrible once again. How else does a team give up 1000 yards in two games?