msn.foxsports.com/story/2646222

BernieSki · Post by **BernieSki** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:58 am

Foxnews has Redskins ranked #14. Denver #1.
What does everyone think?

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 12:04 pm

Its understandable. We have a pretty new roster again, we haven't proven we can play as a unit yet. I wouldn't say Denver is #1, but Im not unhappy about us being #14.

JansenFan · Post by **JansenFan** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 12:06 pm

I think calling the Broncos #1 is a little high. They could be if Quentin Griffin plays well, but that is a huge question mark. They have history on their side in producing 1000 yard rushers, but nothing is a given.

As far as the Redskins ranking, I think that atarting the season at #14 is pretty good considering we were #27 at the end of last season. We have improved the team as well as the coaching staff, and we got a nice bump from that. Again, nothing has been proven on the field so you can't expect much more than that at this time.

JPFair · Post by **JPFair** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 12:29 pm

I don't know how they could rank Denver higher than New England.

I really don't care whether they rank us 14 or 32. I would actually think 14 is a generous ranking for us until we can prove them that we deserve higher.

doctordrew · Post by **doctordrew** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 1:12 pm

I agree with JPFair. It is always better being the underdog. I wish we were ranked 32.

redskincity · Post by **redskincity** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 2:32 pm

BernieSki wrote:Foxnews has Redskins ranked #14. Denver #1.
What does everyone think?

Foxsport Suck!! We will work on changing minds tonite.

The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

msn.foxsports.com/story/2646222

msn.foxsports.com/story/2646222

Re: msn.foxsports.com/story/2646222