Where are you at on this whole team name change thing?

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Post Reply
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

KazooSkinsFan wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:Not my view, but I like the way I stated yours.

Of course you do! :lol:


I can always count on you to spell check and catch typos, thanks!

And I can always count on you for a narcissistic, Freudian slip to make that task so much fun. Thanks!
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

Deadskins wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:Not my view, but I like the way I stated yours.

Of course you do! :lol:


I can always count on you to spell check and catch typos, thanks!

And I can always count on you for a narcissistic, Freudian slip to make that task so much fun. Thanks!


:-s

That used to work on me. When I was 12...
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
User avatar
Hooligan
Hog
Posts: 1266
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:56 pm
Location: New Jersey

Post by Hooligan »

People are making millions selling rap albums with copious use of the N-word. I think "Redskins", used with no negative intention whatsoever, is a drop in the bucket.
"Even a stopped clock is right twice a day."
welch
Skins History Buff
Skins History Buff
Posts: 6000
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: New York, NY

Post by welch »

I have always backed the name because I am a liberal and a history major and I suspect that the name was chosen to suggest the Boston Braves baseball team (then Milwaukee, now Atlanta), and I think "Braves" was meant to remind people of the Liberty Boys who dressed as Indians when they dumped tea in Boston Harbor.

However, I had a jolt about a month ago when I looked through you-tube for old episodes of The Lone Ranger. I grew up with that show, and remember the 90-minute "pilot" episode. I found it. At one point, the Lone Ranger sends Tonto into town to get help from the deputies. The deputies refuse, saying, aproximately, "Get out of here, you redskin".

The deputies (plot spoiler) are working for the bad guy, and I realized that the script-writers had given them that line -- "redskin" as a term of abuse -- as a tipoff.

I can't imagine another name for the team, but I'm not as comfortable as I was.
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Posts: 7047
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:58 pm

Post by DarthMonk »

welch wrote:I have always backed the name because I am a liberal and a history major and I suspect that the name was chosen to suggest the Boston Braves baseball team (then Milwaukee, now Atlanta), and I think "Braves" was meant to remind people of the Liberty Boys who dressed as Indians when they dumped tea in Boston Harbor.

However, I had a jolt about a month ago when I looked through you-tube for old episodes of The Lone Ranger. I grew up with that show, and remember the 90-minute "pilot" episode. I found it. At one point, the Lone Ranger sends Tonto into town to get help from the deputies. The deputies refuse, saying, aproximately, "Get out of here, you redskin".

The deputies (plot spoiler) are working for the bad guy, and I realized that the script-writers had given them that line -- "redskin" as a term of abuse -- as a tipoff.

I can't imagine another name for the team, but I'm not as comfortable as I was.


Not saying we should change the name but I have pretty much always had the same discomfort. I grew up hearing it as a perjorative in many westerns and that is pretty much how I've always heard it used outside the context of our team.

For example, I don't think I've ever heard a newscaster use the term except when talking about our team - not in over 50 years of watching.

Thanks, Welch.
Hog Bowl III, V, X Champion (2011, 2013, 2018)

Hognostication Champion (2011, 2013, 2016)

Hognostibowl XII Champion (2017, 2018)


Scalp 'em, Swamp 'em,
We will take 'em big score!
Read 'em, Weep 'em Touchdown,
We want heap more!
User avatar
HTTRRG3ALMO
Hog
Posts: 760
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 6:29 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Post by HTTRRG3ALMO »

I'm against the name change, but I certainly hope that if we MUST change it, that we're not stuck with some idiotic name that we'll be ashamed of.

If they called the team the "Senators" or any DC politics I'm going to get sick...then buy a jersey LOL

Bright side, call them the Washington Hogs and you guys can sell this site for a small fortune...retire early and buy your own island. Compliments of Mr. Snyder :D

Let the fans decide the name.
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

If Dan gets to choose, it will be the "Snyders".
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
HTTRRG3ALMO
Hog
Posts: 760
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 6:29 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Post by HTTRRG3ALMO »

yupchagee wrote:If Dan gets to choose, it will be the "Snyders".


I'll behave; so many inappropriate logo ideas :twisted:
mastdark81
Hog
Posts: 916
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 7:21 pm

Post by mastdark81 »

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/09/07/king-drops-use-of-redskins-name/

If he feels that our name is offensive I cannot be mad at him for taking this stance even though I do not agree with our name being offensive. Wish folks, however would do more research before they make actions like this. There is nothing negative in the color "red". If we were named the stinkskins or the dirtyskins that is another story but "Red"Skins?

What is offensive are the terms you use before or after the adjective Redskins to describe an individual or in this case our team.

It bothers me to know that some people will think that the name Redskins is the same as calling a black person a N****. Thats ridiculous.

As far as the Native Americans that are sensitive towards the name, I believe it's the same as when a group of black activists wanted blacks to be labeled as African Americans instead of "black." You will always have a small group that disagree because of their very strong views, but in reality blacks from a full scope of things didn't care whether or not "black" was used because for the most part it wasn't used in a negative sense.

The issue should die down now that the season has started, however I believe Redskin pr team should be more pro-active in the future educating fans and groups how our name became, how our logo was designed and approved by a Native American.
The Hogster
#######
#######
Posts: 7225
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by The Hogster »

Now that the season is officially underway, can we let this crap topic die? Let the non-fans, politicians etc discuss this moot point in the offseason. HAIL

BEAT PHILLY

REDSKINS FOR LIFE
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
User avatar
DaveD1420
Hog
Posts: 386
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 11:25 pm
Location: Grand Forks, ND

Post by DaveD1420 »

skinsfan#33
#33
#33
Posts: 4084
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am

Post by skinsfan#33 »

The Hogster wrote:Now that the season is officially underway, can we let this crap topic die? Let the non-fans, politicians etc discuss this moot point in the offseason. HAIL

BEAT PHILLY

REDSKINS FOR LIFE


It will be interesting to see if PFT does, because they have a major woody to get the name changed! Mike Florio ACTS (and yes Mike it is a BS act) like the team name personally offends him like the team is named the Washington FlorioMom'saWhore!

Just Beat the EGirls! Like the bad, bad EGirls they are!
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
User avatar
riggofan
HereComesTheDiesel
HereComesTheDiesel
Posts: 9460
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:29 pm
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Post by riggofan »

Ugh. I can't believe we're still discussing this. WE'RE PLAYING OUR FIRST GAME OF THE SEASON IN 3 HOURS!!! :)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"You can't do epic **** with basic people." - DJax
"We're on the rise, man, whether you're on the train or not." - Josh Norman
User avatar
Burgundy&Wha?
Hog
Posts: 4610
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 6:13 pm
Location: Virginia

Post by Burgundy&Wha? »

Here's a surprisingly different perspective from someone at ESPN. Nice to see someone taking our side in this. http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/96892 ... asy-sounds
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

The word 'Oklahoma' itself is Choctaw for 'red people.'
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
User avatar
StorminMormon86
Hog
Posts: 2368
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:23 pm
Location: Pasadena, MD

Post by StorminMormon86 »

Deadskins wrote:
The word 'Oklahoma' itself is Choctaw for 'red people.'

This should settle the debate but it won't.
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Posts: 7047
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:58 pm

Post by DarthMonk »

StorminMormon86 wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
The word 'Oklahoma' itself is Choctaw for 'red people.'

This should settle the debate but it won't.


Which debate??

Image
Hog Bowl III, V, X Champion (2011, 2013, 2018)

Hognostication Champion (2011, 2013, 2016)

Hognostibowl XII Champion (2017, 2018)


Scalp 'em, Swamp 'em,
We will take 'em big score!
Read 'em, Weep 'em Touchdown,
We want heap more!
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

I understand that the 'name' for our team could be misconstrued but, as they say, beauty is in the eye of the beholder ... when I refer to the Redskins, I have no thoughts of malice or degradation and I really doubt that most Native Americans are really upset at the name

My 2 cents
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Posts: 7047
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:58 pm

Post by DarthMonk »

StorminMormon86 wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
The word 'Oklahoma' itself is Choctaw for 'red people.'

This should settle the debate but it won't.


This is from wiki. It does not refute the point I think the Deadman is trying to make but there is something to be learned. The word below simply meant black skinned and was not originally perjorative. Same goes for Redskin and no single group, Indian or otherwise, cornered the market for the term.

Among Anglophones, the word nigger was not always considered derogatory, because it then denoted "black-skinned", a common Anglophone usage. Nineteenth-century English (language) literature features usages of nigger without racist connotation, e.g. the Joseph Conrad novella The Nigger of the 'Narcissus' (1897). Moreover, Charles Dickens and Mark Twain created characters who used the word as contemporary usage. Twain, in the autobiographic book Life on the Mississippi (1883), used the term within quotes, indicating reported usage, but used the term "negro" when speaking in his own narrative persona.

During the fur trade of the early 1800s to the late 1840s in the Western United States, the word was spelled "niggur", and is often recorded in literature of the time. George Fredrick Ruxton often included the word as part of the "mountain man" lexicon, did not indicate that the word was pejorative at the time. "Niggur" was evidently similar to the modern use of dude, or guy. This passage from Ruxton's Life in the Far West illustrates a common use of the word in spoken form—the speaker here referring to himself: "Travler, marm, this niggur's no travler; I ar' a trapper, marm, a mountain-man, wagh!" It was not used as a term exclusively for blacks among mountain men during this period, as Indians, Mexicans, and Frenchmen and Anglos alike could be a "niggur".

By the 1900s, nigger had become a pejorative word. In its stead, the term colored became the mainstream alternative to negro and its derived terms. Abolitionists in Boston, Massachusetts, posted warnings to the Colored People of Boston and vicinity. Writing in 1904, journalist Clifton Johnson documented the "opprobrious" character of the word nigger, emphasizing that it was chosen in the South precisely because it was more offensive than "colored." Established as mainstream American English usage, the word colored features in the organizational title of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, reflecting the members' racial identity preference at the 1909 foundation. In the Southern United States, the local American English dialect changes the pronunciation of negro to nigra. Linguistically, in developing American English, in the early editions of A Compendious Dictionary of the English Language (1806), lexicographer Noah Webster suggested the neger new spelling in place of negro.

By the late 1960s, the social progress achieved by groups in the United States such as the Black Civil Rights Movement [1955–68], had legitimized the racial identity word black as mainstream American English usage to denote black-skinned Americans of African ancestry. In the 90's, "Black" was later displaced in favor of the compound blanket term African American. Moreover, as a compound word, African American resembles the vogue word Afro-American, an early-1970s popular usage. Currently, some black Americans continue to use the word nigger, often spelled as nigga and niggah, without irony, either to neutralize the word's impact or as a sign of solidarity.
Hog Bowl III, V, X Champion (2011, 2013, 2018)

Hognostication Champion (2011, 2013, 2016)

Hognostibowl XII Champion (2017, 2018)


Scalp 'em, Swamp 'em,
We will take 'em big score!
Read 'em, Weep 'em Touchdown,
We want heap more!
User avatar
gushogs
Hog
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:57 pm
Location: Panama

Post by gushogs »

Next in line: the Mets, derogatory name used by people that live in the suburbs or the country side.....

HaiL,
FEDUP!
User avatar
Bishop Hammer
Hog
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 3:33 am

Post by Bishop Hammer »

The Hogster wrote:The name will always be the Washington Redskins. Native Americans don't even find it offensive. Fake outrage and the team should never cave.

HAIL TO THE REDSKINS


I think its more offensive that people are telling Native Americans who aren't offended they know what's better for them than them.

And when someone points out they have NA blood in them and they're not offended. Often they're told "that doesn't count. You're not full NA." So I guess they only want "pure blooded" people, huh. Who else has said that. :twisted:
I don't have to sell my soul,
He's already in me,
I don't need to sell my soul,
He's already in me.
I wanna be adored
I wanna be adored.

Stone Roses
I wanna be adored
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

I voted for Obama in the first election and then realized that he was just another politician that made promises he had ZERO intention of keeping

and now this
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-foo ... nging-name

what a waste this man is proving to be as a politician and as a president
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
User avatar
riggofan
HereComesTheDiesel
HereComesTheDiesel
Posts: 9460
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:29 pm
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Post by riggofan »

SkinsJock wrote:what a waste this man is proving to be as a politician and as a president


Yeah what a jerk. I can't believe he said he would actually **think** about changing the name. Shame on a politician for actually considering both sides of an issue. :puke:

On the plus side, he didn't threaten to shut down the government if he doesn't get his way. So I guess he can't be all bad.
User avatar
rskin72
Hog
Posts: 359
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 1:56 pm

Post by rskin72 »

Not suprising to me as to where a fairly liberal democratic president falls on this subject. If I were the President, I would "think" about our national debt/deficit, and maybe getting a signed budget would be nice as well.

Some of the more major media sports outlets seem to be pushing this agenda....right or wrong....and I think it is wrong. I would say that the more the media latches onto this like a flea-bitten mutt latches onto a steakbone, then the more likely that eventually the owner may be compelled to change the name. Also, this is a politically correct era that we live in, and (right or wrong) it does not take a majority to be offended at any particular issue for change to occur/be forced upon us.

I wear, and have, a lot of Redskin-centric stuff.....This year, for the first time since I have been a fan, I have heard other folks comment about this subject outside of the DMV. Not a lot, but just the fact that it is now on some folks radar.
A winning effort begins with preparation.
Failures are expected by losers, ignored by winners.

Quotes by Joe Gibbs
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

Barack Obama told the AP that if he were the Redskins owner, he would "think about changing" the name because the moniker offends “a sizeable group of people.”

Yeah, white, PC nazi's who have nothing better to do. You would think the President has more pressing issues on his plate right now. :roll:
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
Post Reply