D-Hall coming back

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Tue Apr 09, 2013 8:47 am

Deadskins wrote:
1niksder wrote:It's easier to cut Hall than it is to cut Biggers than Hall

To clarify, which is easier to cut?

Biggers has a cap hit of $1.5M and Hall's cap hit is $250,000 less however cutting Hall would free up his $1M base salary with $250K in dead money or a savings of $750K on the cap. Cutting Biggers would only free up $635K in base and carry $365K in dead money or a net savings of only $270K.

So if you needed cap space it would be easier to cut Hall and gain $480K more in cap space than if you cut Biggers. Same if you only have one roster spot and their performance in TC is equal.

langleyparkjoe · Post by **langleyparkjoe** » Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:16 am

1niksder wrote:Biggers has a cap hit of $1.5M and Hall's cap hit is $250,000 less however cutting Hall would free up his $1M base salary with $250K in dead money or a savings of $750K on the cap. Cutting Biggers would only free up $635K in base and carry $365K in dead money or a net savings of only $270K.

So if you needed cap space it would be easier to cut Hall and gain $480K more in cap space than if you cut Biggers. Same if you only have one roster spot and their performance in TC is equal.

After reading this over like 7 x's, I'm still like... :-s

I'll just watch on gameday and hope for the best :lol:

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:34 am

langleyparkjoe wrote:
1niksder wrote:Biggers has a cap hit of $1.5M and Hall's cap hit is $250,000 less however cutting Hall would free up his $1M base salary with $250K in dead money or a savings of $750K on the cap. Cutting Biggers would only free up $635K in base and carry $365K in dead money or a net savings of only $270K.

So if you needed cap space it would be easier to cut Hall and gain $480K more in cap space than if you cut Biggers. Same if you only have one roster spot and their performance in TC is equal.

After reading this over like 7 x's, I'm still like...

I'll just watch on gameday and hope for the best

Might be the half mil roster bonus in Biggers deal that's not in Hall's :twisted:

langleyparkjoe · Post by **langleyparkjoe** » Tue Apr 09, 2013 10:50 am

EVERYONE LOOK, UK'S CHANGED HIS SIGNATURE!!!

The Hogster · Post by **The Hogster** » Tue Apr 09, 2013 2:16 pm

Redskins are still $30,000 under the cap. Keep the change, Mara.

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Tue Apr 09, 2013 5:00 pm

langleyparkjoe wrote:EVERYONE LOOK, UK'S CHANGED HIS SIGNATURE!!!

The Hogster wrote:Redskins are still $30,000 under the cap. Keep the change, Mara.

emoses14 · Post by **emoses14** » Tue Apr 09, 2013 5:56 pm

The Hogster wrote:Redskins are still $30,000 under the cap. Keep the change, Mara.

In both of our wins against them this year, I want to score 36 points and then take a knee for the rest of the game

langleyparkjoe · Post by **langleyparkjoe** » Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:21 am

emoses14 wrote:
The Hogster wrote:Redskins are still $30,000 under the cap. Keep the change, Mara.

In both of our wins against them this year, I want to score 36 points and then take a knee for the rest of the game

36? That's it???

emoses14 · Post by **emoses14** » Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:58 am

langleyparkjoe wrote:
emoses14 wrote:
The Hogster wrote:Redskins are still $30,000 under the cap. Keep the change, Mara.

In both of our wins against them this year, I want to score 36 points and then take a knee for the rest of the game

36? That's it???

Yes, exactly 36. Alternatively, we could beat them by exactly 36, but that might be a little hard to do.

But 36 is the key.