Are we using the replacement refs who are incompetent on this or the regular ones who hate us?
We're using the regular incompetent replacement refs that hate us...
SouthLondonRedskin wrote:Are we using the replacement refs who are incompetent on this or the regular ones who hate us?
We're using the regular incompetent replacement refs that hate us...
welch wrote:Welcome.
I took your post as big-talk and humor...as when I say "I might have to take a volume of Knuth's Art of Computer Programming and bop somebody in the head with it".
In the real-life Hogs Net, I think the worst offense tends to be a personal attack on another poster. We have usually tried to follow a model of: disagree with the opinion, but don't insult the person.
You have been pointed to a set of board rules. There are usually rules within the rules, and Hogs Nets mods are level-headed people...good common sense. Best anywhere...otherwise, this board would not have lived so long and prospered. [yes, Spock-reference] I'm trying to think of the underlying principle to behavior that "ends badly".
Of course, there were other rules, such as:
- never call Art Monk "merely a possession receiver"
That one is obsolete, though.
Countertrey wrote:welch wrote:Welcome.
I took your post as big-talk and humor...as when I say "I might have to take a volume of Knuth's Art of Computer Programming and bop somebody in the head with it".
In the real-life Hogs Net, I think the worst offense tends to be a personal attack on another poster. We have usually tried to follow a model of: disagree with the opinion, but don't insult the person.
You have been pointed to a set of board rules. There are usually rules within the rules, and Hogs Nets mods are level-headed people...good common sense. Best anywhere...otherwise, this board would not have lived so long and prospered. [yes, Spock-reference] I'm trying to think of the underlying principle to behavior that "ends badly".
Of course, there were other rules, such as:
- never call Art Monk "merely a possession receiver"
That one is obsolete, though.
Does this mean I get my milk money back?
there's interest, you know...
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.
Countertrey wrote:welch wrote:Welcome.
I took your post as big-talk and humor...as when I say "I might have to take a volume of Knuth's Art of Computer Programming and bop somebody in the head with it".
In the real-life Hogs Net, I think the worst offense tends to be a personal attack on another poster. We have usually tried to follow a model of: disagree with the opinion, but don't insult the person.
You have been pointed to a set of board rules. There are usually rules within the rules, and Hogs Nets mods are level-headed people...good common sense. Best anywhere...otherwise, this board would not have lived so long and prospered. [yes, Spock-reference] I'm trying to think of the underlying principle to behavior that "ends badly".
Of course, there were other rules, such as:
- never call Art Monk "merely a possession receiver"
That one is obsolete, though.
Does this mean I get my milk money back?
there's interest, you know...
DarthMonk wrote:Allow me:
I'd like to kick Haz's ass.
I'd like to take Kyle out back and have him run a few options. I'd also like to confiscate his binky.
I'd like to dock Shanny 500K every time he burns a 2nd half timeout in the the 3rd quarter to save 5 yards.
One more thing - the next time we have a home opener with a Heisman winning rookie at QB that everyone came to see and we win the toss, I'd like the ball as opposed to deferring and putting Haz and the D in charge.
Peace out fellas.
DarthMonk
welch wrote:Countertrey wrote:welch wrote:Welcome.
I took your post as big-talk and humor...as when I say "I might have to take a volume of Knuth's Art of Computer Programming and bop somebody in the head with it".
In the real-life Hogs Net, I think the worst offense tends to be a personal attack on another poster. We have usually tried to follow a model of: disagree with the opinion, but don't insult the person.
You have been pointed to a set of board rules. There are usually rules within the rules, and Hogs Nets mods are level-headed people...good common sense. Best anywhere...otherwise, this board would not have lived so long and prospered. [yes, Spock-reference] I'm trying to think of the underlying principle to behavior that "ends badly".
Of course, there were other rules, such as:
- never call Art Monk "merely a possession receiver"
That one is obsolete, though.
Does this mean I get my milk money back?
there's interest, you know...
As best I remember, you said that Gil Coan was better than Roy Sievers, and that Griffith had been snookered when he traded Coan for Roy. That's a serious violation!!
In many cases, it seems, a permanent ban at ES is a favor...ACW wrote:Ugh, ES. Unfair permanent ban there
Deadskins wrote:DarthMonk wrote:Extremejerks.com
Isn't that a porn site?
Smurf85 wrote:Well I came across this site, because I've been booted from Extremskins for a month.
So through this site and this thread. I pretty much sent Jumbo a email telling him just to give me a permanent ban.
I've never been on a site that is so one sided. You're not allowed to say anything without getting a week off or more.
I don't even know what I did this time and they don't even have enough guts to tell you. Not to mention he sends an email without a return address, because he doesn't have a pair.
Don't get it, but I'm glad to try this site out.
I'm sure i won't agree with all of you and you won't agree with me, but damn I can't take extremeskins anymore.
Glad I got banned tonight. Allowed me to bump into this site.
So I look forward to bitching with you guys about this team.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.
Deadskins wrote:Smurf85 wrote:Well I came across this site, because I've been booted from Extremskins for a month.
So through this site and this thread. I pretty much sent Jumbo a email telling him just to give me a permanent ban.
I've never been on a site that is so one sided. You're not allowed to say anything without getting a week off or more.
I don't even know what I did this time and they don't even have enough guts to tell you. Not to mention he sends an email without a return address, because he doesn't have a pair.
Don't get it, but I'm glad to try this site out.
I'm sure i won't agree with all of you and you won't agree with me, but damn I can't take extremeskins anymore.
Glad I got banned tonight. Allowed me to bump into this site.
So I look forward to bitching with you guys about this team.
Welcome aboard. We get a lot of people in your situation. Once you've been here a while, you'll wonder why you were ever any place else. We are definitely a lot more tolerant, but there are still rules. And check out the rest of the site too. You'll be amazed at how much THN has to offer.
Countertrey wrote:It's not so much that we're tolerant...
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.
Deadskins wrote:Countertrey wrote:It's not so much that we're tolerant...
Well, that "we" obviously wasn't meant to include you, CT.
hitmandm wrote:All Redskins fans who enjoy talking about their team with respect and diversity should leave ES and come to places like here.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.