Redskins-Browns postgame....

tribeofjudah · Post by **tribeofjudah** » Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:56 am

Rich Campbell ‏@Rich_Campbell

Cleveland sports radio CRUSHING the Browns this a.m. "Their backup rookie QB is better than our two first round picks (Richardson, Weeden)!"
Details

Irn-Bru · Post by **Irn-Bru** » Mon Dec 17, 2012 12:01 pm

Nice.

Kilmer72 · Post by **Kilmer72** » Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:59 pm

emoses14 wrote:
Scottskins wrote:on a brighter note, did you see that replay in slow motion of Cousins doing his progressions? He calmly scanned left to right before throwing for the first down. Not sure if it will be next year or the year after, but we are going to get some good draft picks for captain kirk =) And I think he is going to be a very good QB in this league...

I really think that we keep Kirk for another year or 2, them flip him for picks. Like a 1 and 4 or a 2 and 3

I can't find it now but I thought I read in the Post that Charlie Casserly said he was worth two number two's.

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:41 pm

Kilmer72 wrote:I read in the Post that Charlie Casserly said he was worth two number two's.

Mathematically, that makes sense, since we gave up a number four to get him. :lol:

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Mon Dec 17, 2012 6:26 pm

Bob 0119 wrote:But at least Nick Sundberg wasn't hurt. We are 6-0 when he starts. Man's a beast!

Well, of course! And, he has said as much.

emoses14 · Post by **emoses14** » Mon Dec 17, 2012 6:47 pm

Deadskins wrote:
Kilmer72 wrote:I read in the Post that Charlie Casserly said he was worth two number two's.

Mathematically, that makes sense, since we gave up a number four to get him.

DarthMonk · Post by **DarthMonk** » Mon Dec 17, 2012 6:50 pm

Burgundy&Wha? wrote:The D held Trent Richardson to 28 yards?!?!? That's a lot of attaboy's earned. Good on 'em.

... and the son-of-a BITCH still got 2 TDs against me in THN Fantasy semis. ;furious;

Probably gonna make the difference. :-({|=

Champsturf · Post by **Champsturf** » Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:14 am

I was at the game and saw first hand the terrible officiating. Just so sad that they can't call a fair game. Someone needs to explain two men in motion several times to to me. I thought that that was a penalty.
It was an outstanding game to attend though. Perfect weather, a great amount of Redskins fans there, a very important win, and overall, I didn't encounter too many stupid Browns fans. Most were polite and LOVED my Black Taylor jersey!
Here's to a great run and hoping that it continues! HTTR

UK Skins Fan · Post by **UK Skins Fan** » Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:31 am

Chris Luva Luva wrote:This is the best Redskins team I've ever seen. The 80's mean diddly squat to me, I wasn't there.

#HTTR This is what good football feels like!

That is both joyous, and deeply sad at the same time. I don't know whether to laugh or cry for you!

Some of Norv Turner's teams were actually half decent, but there is more hope in this team than any team of the last 20 years. Enjoy the ride my friend.

Irn-Bru · Post by **Irn-Bru** » Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:52 am

Champsturf wrote:Someone needs to explain two men in motion several times to to me. I thought that that was a penalty.

You can send two men in motion as long as they are both set before the snap.

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:10 am

Irn-Bru wrote:
Champsturf wrote:Someone needs to explain two men in motion to me. I thought that that was a penalty.

You can send two men in motion as long as they are both set before the snap.

I know that having 2 players in motion at the snap is a penalty - do they both have to get set or does just 1 of them need to be set before the snap?

gay4pacman · Post by **gay4pacman** » Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:49 am

both have to be set.

44diesel · Post by **44diesel** » Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:50 pm

Here's a funny story from Sunday's game apparently Kirk really is all about the "TEAM."

Cool

ey talks about how in the huddle, Kirk says "TEAM" before calling the play.

“The one-liners I liked a lot, the first was first-hand,” ey continued. “We’re trying to run the clock out at the end of the first [half]. He gets off the headset with Kyle Shanahan, comes into the huddle and he says, ‘Guys, I want to talk to you for a second. I have a couple things to tell you.’ In the huddle. ‘First, protect the ball. Second, stay in bounds. TEAM! Then he calls the play.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/dc- ... very-play/

Once again, the character that this team possesses is unbelievable. When you hear these guys talk, from rookies like RGIII to Morris to Cousins to Forbath to vets like Fletcher, there's such a great spirit that keeps this team going. They're out there kickin' butt and having fun at the same time. The coaching staff/FO has done a great job eliminating egos and building a solid unit that has bought in to the Shanaplan (especially since the bye week) and has been red hot. Hail yeah!

Irn-Bru · Post by **Irn-Bru** » Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:13 pm

That is straight out of the 1930s. Nice find.

riggofan · Post by **riggofan** » Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:14 pm

Nice post, 44diesel. There's no questioning the character of Cousins or RGIII, that's for sure. Quality individuals. Lucky for us they're both ballers too.

skinsfan#33 · Post by **skinsfan#33** » Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:22 pm

SkinsJock wrote:
Irn-Bru wrote:
Champsturf wrote:Someone needs to explain two men in motion to me. I thought that that was a penalty.

You can send two men in motion as long as they are both set before the snap.

I know that having 2 players in motion at the snap is a penalty - do they both have to get set or does just 1 of them need to be set before the snap?

As G4P said they both have to set, but once set you can send one player in motion.

Champsturf · Post by **Champsturf** » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:10 am

Thanks about the motion thing guys. I must just be a fool. ;-)

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Wed Dec 19, 2012 9:37 am

Thanks - I knew that 1 player could be in motion - I did not know that if 2 players were in motion BOTH had to be set - then a player could go in motion

44diesel · Post by **44diesel** » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:32 pm

Irn-Bru wrote:ROTFALMAO

That is straight out of the 1930s. Nice find.

Ha! I was thinking the same thing! My grandfather played ball in the 1930's. Growing up, he would tell me stories of the "glory days" with leather helmets, addressing players like a general going into battle.

"OK, men... here's the play..."

Classic.

welch · Post by **welch** » Wed Dec 19, 2012 2:27 pm

SkinsJock wrote:Thanks - I knew that 1 player could be in motion - I did not know that if 2 players were in motion BOTH had to be set - then a player could go in motion

Get out your video of SB 17, and especially the Riggins run.

Gibbs only had a few plays, but he ran them from many formations. That's what made it hard for a defense to guess a play before it hit them: shift here, shift there, shift etc. Then set, and someone goes in motion.

FLWSkin · Post by **FLWSkin** » Wed Dec 19, 2012 2:37 pm

I think back then we had like nine running plays, but ran them from over thirty different formations. Classic.

44diesel · Post by **44diesel** » Wed Dec 19, 2012 2:54 pm

riggofan wrote:Nice post, 44diesel. There's no questioning the character of Cousins or RGIII, that's for sure. Quality individuals. Lucky for us they're both ballers too.

Definitely worth the wait.