If cousins starts vs browns: We will lose

Bob 0119 · Post by **Bob 0119** » Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:12 am

Scottskins wrote:If Captain Kirk plays, we will still win!!!

+1 I think it would be foolish to write off Cousins based on his abbreviated "come in from the cold bench" performance. This is a guy the Shanaclan thought so highly of that even though they had already drafted the future franchise QB in RGIII, they still felt this guy was a steal in the fourth round.

Let's see what he can do with a week of reps with the starters and a gameplan built for him.

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:21 am

The fact is that IF Kirk Cousins starts OR plays QB for a part of the game this Sunday has no real bearing on the outcome

The Redskins can win the game with either RG3 or Kirk Cousins - no question

I think that Kirk Cousins is a very capable NFL QB - he's also VERY motivated to not make mistakes AND play VERY well whenever he gets a shot

I just think that RG3 is starting this game - he's only got a mild sprain - he AND the coaches know the importance of EVERYTHING to do with his impact on this franchise for both the now and also the future

no worries - both of our QBs are capable of beating the Browns who will probably 'help' us get a win - no matter who starts at QB :wink:

The Hogster · Post by **The Hogster** » Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:40 pm

The Cleveland Browns fan has already left the building. :lol:

He's gone to get his brown paper bag ready for Sunday. HAIL

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:53 am

funsho2 wrote:Cousins is not RG3....RG3 have not turn over the ball like luck this year thats one of the thing that makes him special....kirk will turn the ball over vs a great browns defense.....and we will lose at a critical time....michael jordan played while he was sick....if rg3 can go lets go....these are critical games....if we win out we will win either the division or a wild card spot

Please stop.

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:29 am

^^ thanks CLL - I second that :roll:

DOGSRBACK · Post by **DOGSRBACK** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:26 pm

Looks like RG3 is playing thats great!!!!! That means when we win you cant make excuses why you lost.....I would be concerned about RG3 because if big Phil Taylor comes thru and hits him he might be KOed

BTW when did the Baylor become Nfl melting pot

RG3
Gordon
Talyor
Wright

off top of my head all 4 players very good

The Hogster · Post by **The Hogster** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:47 pm

DOGSRBACK wrote:Looks like RG3 is playing thats great!!!!! That means when we win you cant make excuses why you lost.....I would be concerned about RG3 because if big Phil Taylor comes thru and hits him he might be KOed

BTW when did the Baylor become Nfl melting pot

RG3
Gordon
Talyor
Wright

off top of my head all 4 players very good

Phil Taylor couldn't catch RGIII if he was in a hov around.

DarthMonk · Post by **DarthMonk** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:54 pm

DOGSRBACK wrote:Looks like RG3 is playing thats great!!!!! That means when we win you cant make excuses why you lost....

unlike you:

DOGSRBACK wrote:8. Only way you win is if the Browns over look the Skins because we have to go to Peytons house the following week and that could get ugly

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:24 pm

unlike the Browns who seem to need excuses, we made the deal to get RG3

win or lose on Sunday we'll still be in the playoff hunt

AND

we'll still have RG3 ...

what will you guys be doing? :lol:

are there many fans there that are still wondering "what if we had an FO and they'd made it clear to the Rams that .... " no way, right?

you guys didn't really want RG3 ..... did you? :twisted:

DOGSRBACK · Post by **DOGSRBACK** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:20 pm

No doubt RG3 is great and ya he would have looked great in a Browns Uni!!!! but We would not have got Trich, Gordon, Swrartz( RT) and many others who have done a solid job.

Remember RG3 would not be doing what he his doing in Wash in Cleveland. Why, the Browns FO would not blow there load on 3 Wide out in free agents, and they are not that sart to take Morris either. You cant just pop in RG3 in cleveland and say we ould have Trich, Gordon Etc Etc...

Also Didnt you give up a butt load of draft picks for RG3?? now it might be worth it in the end, but my only concern with him is how small he is, how he might get hurt. I hope he never gets hurt because he is truly fun to watch!!!! He is a STUD

Its same agruement I here with Doug Martin and TRich...Doug martin would not do what he is doing in Tampa in Cleveland because of VJAX, williams, Clark, and Freeman....

All in all Browns fans are very happy with there draft. Weeden is no RG3, but is 1000X better than what we have had the past 15 years....

Good luck this weekend Browns win 28-23 YEP homer pick...DID you really think I would come on a Skins board and say Skins win did you???

cowboykillerzRGiii · Post by **cowboykillerzRGiii** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:36 pm

Since when is ~6'3" 230# small?? I guess Im a midget at 5'7 180 ripped lol

riggofan · Post by **riggofan** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:41 pm

Weeden 1000x better than Colt McCoy? Yea, I don't think so:

http://www.clevelandfrowns.com/2012/12/ ... pectively/

Note that Colt had just one fewer completion in the exact same number of attempts (!!!), for a total of 304 fewer yards than Weeden, but one more touchdown and four fewer interceptions, with a slightly higher passer rating, and more importantly, nearly double the Total QBR.

LOL. But why let facts get in the way?

FLWSkin · Post by **FLWSkin** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:45 pm

Speaking of draft pick, which team traded several picks to move up one spot to draft a guy they would have had at their original spot anyway?.......

DOGSRBACK · Post by **DOGSRBACK** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:00 pm

Trust me when I tell you Colt Sucks....It was so bad watching his noodle arm. So glad we do not have to see him.

riggofan · Post by **riggofan** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:13 pm

Honestly, I like Weeden and hope he does well for the Browns. Just not this weekend.

Quackjack · Post by **Quackjack** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:29 pm

The Hogster wrote:
DOGSRBACK wrote:OK, I do not think the players on the Browns are going to be pumped up because you drafted RG3. Players do not think that way.

First I want to say I am a HUGE RG3 fan!!! If he does not play you will lose the game.

If he does play its going to be a great game, of course me being a homer I think the Browns win this game.

Yes we are 5-8, but we are 5-3 last 8 games. With Joe Haden playing we are 5-2 and with Big Phil Taylor playing we are 3-0...

You will have problems with Josh Gordon we is Nasty

TRICH is a stud, but he does not break big runs. He knows where the End Zone is with 9 TDs

Our Oline is nasty, wuold be shocked if you got to Weeden.

The fact is this will be a great game if RG3 plays, he is amazing and makes all those free agent wide outs you signed even better.

27-20 Browns..I know Homer pick, and I am sure you all will blast me and say stupid *sh$t* BLAH BLAH......

Should be a great game!!!!

This must be what we sounded like when we sucked. Dude, ya'll will lose this game whether RG plays or not.

We are the better team. Better rookie RB, Better rookie QB, better coached. Just better. Phil Taylor will be a non factor versus the zone scheme.

Better offense sure, better defense? Eh, it's equal.

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:27 pm

I have nothing against the Browns or Brandon Weeden - I hope they do well

win or lose this Sunday - I think that most football fans would agree, we're a lot closer to getting to the big dance than the Browns

mostly because we have RG3 - that's just a fact

The Browns have a good group to build around but ...

having a QB like RG3 has a huge effect across the board in building a team like we are going through here

DOGSRBACK · Post by **DOGSRBACK** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:28 pm

Quackjack 8 turnovers SHHHHHH this is a chat between teams that take care of the football and dont have a rapiest as a QB

Quackjack · Post by **Quackjack** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:43 pm

DOGSRBACK wrote:Quackjack 8 turnovers SHHHHHH this is a chat between teams that take care of the football and dont have a rapiest as a QB

Yes, I am sure we don't have rapiest as a quarterback. Take care of the football? Geez, 6 rings sure came outta nowhere. Shut up Browns fan, and go buy a Weeden jersey before he retires in a few years.

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:31 pm

Quackjack wrote:
DOGSRBACK wrote:Quackjack 8 turnovers SHHHHHH this is a chat between teams that take care of the football and dont have a rapiest as a QB

Yes, I am sure we don't have rapiest as a quarterback. Take care of the football? Geez, 6 rings sure came outta nowhere. Shut up Browns fan, and go buy a Weeden jersey before he retires in a few years.

Rapiest: A user of a rapier.

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:33 pm

Countertrey wrote:
Quackjack wrote:
DOGSRBACK wrote:Quackjack 8 turnovers SHHHHHH this is a chat between teams that take care of the football and dont have a rapiest as a QB

Yes, I am sure we don't have rapiest as a quarterback. Take care of the football? Geez, 6 rings sure came outta nowhere. Shut up Browns fan, and go buy a Weeden jersey before he retires in a few years.

Rapiest: A user of a rapier.

Knowbody uses that term. :twisted:

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:41 pm

Deadskins wrote:
Countertrey wrote:
Quackjack wrote:
DOGSRBACK wrote:Quackjack 8 turnovers SHHHHHH this is a chat between teams that take care of the football and dont have a rapiest as a QB

Yes, I am sure we don't have rapiest as a quarterback. Take care of the football? Geez, 6 rings sure came outta nowhere. Shut up Browns fan, and go buy a Weeden jersey before he retires in a few years.

Rapiest: A user of a rapier.

Knowbody uses that term.

Of course they do... I took it directly from the "Unabridged Metallica Dictionary of Archaic Anglo/Celtic Terminlogy". Have you never listened to "Whiskey in the Jar"? My God, man.

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:03 pm

Countertrey wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
Countertrey wrote:
Quackjack wrote:
DOGSRBACK wrote:Quackjack 8 turnovers SHHHHHH this is a chat between teams that take care of the football and dont have a rapiest as a QB

Yes, I am sure we don't have rapiest as a quarterback. Take care of the football? Geez, 6 rings sure came outta nowhere. Shut up Browns fan, and go buy a Weeden jersey before he retires in a few years.

Rapiest: A user of a rapier.

Knowbody uses that term.

Of course they do... I took it directly from the "Unabridged Metallica Dictionary of Archaic Anglo/Celtic Terminlogy". Have you never listened to "Whiskey in the Jar"? My God, man.

Know, I think you miss understood my point. Knowbody in there rite mined wood ever call Big Been a rapiest. :wink:

Quackjack · Post by **Quackjack** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:24 am

Deadskins wrote:
Countertrey wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
Countertrey wrote:
Quackjack wrote:
DOGSRBACK wrote:Quackjack 8 turnovers SHHHHHH this is a chat between teams that take care of the football and dont have a rapiest as a QB

Yes, I am sure we don't have rapiest as a quarterback. Take care of the football? Geez, 6 rings sure came outta nowhere. Shut up Browns fan, and go buy a Weeden jersey before he retires in a few years.

Rapiest: A user of a rapier.

Knowbody uses that term.

Of course they do... I took it directly from the "Unabridged Metallica Dictionary of Archaic Anglo/Celtic Terminlogy". Have you never listened to "Whiskey in the Jar"? My God, man.

Know, I think you miss understood my point. Knowbody in there rite mined wood ever call Big Been a rapiest.

Big Bean is such a sharp gentlemen, no?

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:56 pm

funsho2 wrote:Cousins is not RG3....RG3 have not turn over the ball like luck this year thats one of the thing that makes him special....kirk will turn the ball over vs a great browns defense.....and we will lose at a critical time....michael jordan played while he was sick....if rg3 can go lets go....these are critical games....if we win out we will win either the division or a wild card spot

You're wrong on a number of things here ... :roll:

the Redskins will not lose this game 'because' of the play of the QB - either QB can win this game

RG3 will play if he's able to and it looks as though that is the case - NOT because we cannot win with Kirk as QB

nothing is guaranteed if we win out except that we will have clearly demonstrated that this franchise is going to be VERY competitive again

and

it's been a VERY successful season

btw - you are correct - Cousins is not RG3 :wink:

The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

If cousins starts vs browns: We will lose

Re: If cousins starts vs browns: We will lose

Re: If cousins starts vs browns: We will lose