Skins-Ravens Recap: Self-Promotion Edition

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:04 am

For the second time this season, I got the chance to fill in for the regular Redskins columnist on RVANews, a local news site here in Richmond. Have a read and let me know what you think!

http://rvanews.com/sports/redskins-our- ... -win/77530

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:15 am

I think the timeout rule is in the final minute, not two, but altogether another good piece.

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:42 am

Deadskins wrote:I think the timeout rule is in the final minute, not two, but altogether another good piece.

You know, I meant to actually look up the rule, but the original injury happened at just under 2 minutes, so either we took a timeout, which wasn't evident from the broadcast, or they took one away from us.

And, thanks!

PAPDOG67 · Post by **PAPDOG67** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:52 pm

Can anyone clarify this for me. I thought there was suppose to be a 10 second run-off after the intentional grounding on RGIII. I was happy to see there wasn't, but I thought that required a 10 second run-off if it occurred with under 2 minutes remaining???

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:34 pm

PAPDOG67 wrote:Can anyone clarify this for me. I thought there was suppose to be a 10 second run-off after the intentional grounding on RGIII. I was happy to see there wasn't, but I thought that required a 10 second run-off if it occurred with under 2 minutes remaining???

The 10 second run-off is if you don't have any time outs.

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:49 pm

cvillehog wrote:
PAPDOG67 wrote:Can anyone clarify this for me. I thought there was suppose to be a 10 second run-off after the intentional grounding on RGIII. I was happy to see there wasn't, but I thought that required a 10 second run-off if it occurred with under 2 minutes remaining???

The 10 second run-off is if you don't have any time outs.

So you just answered your own question about where the timeout went.

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:08 pm

Deadskins wrote:
cvillehog wrote:
PAPDOG67 wrote:Can anyone clarify this for me. I thought there was suppose to be a 10 second run-off after the intentional grounding on RGIII. I was happy to see there wasn't, but I thought that required a 10 second run-off if it occurred with under 2 minutes remaining???

The 10 second run-off is if you don't have any time outs.

So you just answered your own question about where the timeout went.

I looked it up after your post.

welch · Post by **welch** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:42 pm

Wait! The big news is that finally, after almost eight years, I know Cville's real name!

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:53 pm

welch wrote:Wait! The big news is that finally, after almost eight years, I know Cville's real name!

And what I look like! At least, what I looked like earlier this year when I had a beard.

rskin72 · Post by **rskin72** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 7:08 pm

Nice article. And the timeout rule IS after the two minute warning, not one minute. See link below, go to INJURY TIMEOUTS AFTER TWO MINUTE WARNING IN EITHER HALF article 4

http://static.nfl.com/static/content/pu ... Timing.pdf

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:33 pm

rskin72 wrote:Nice article. And the timeout rule IS after the two minute warning, not one minute. See link below, go to INJURY TIMEOUTS AFTER TWO MINUTE WARNING IN EITHER HALF article 4

http://static.nfl.com/static/content/pu ... Timing.pdf

It must be penalties with no timeouts that cost you 10 seconds only in the final minute then.

welch · Post by **welch** » Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:49 pm

cvillehog wrote:
welch wrote:Wait! The big news is that finally, after almost eight years, I know Cville's real name!

And what I look like! At least, what I looked like earlier this year when I had a beard.

Thoughtful. You look thoughtful.

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:58 pm

I thoroughly enjoyed the article - well done

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:37 pm

Thanks guys! I have to say, it was more fun to write this one than the last one I did (Steelers).