Brandon Banks - The Wide Receiver

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

riggofan wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:let me point out that after we scored the FG and the kickoff went out of bounds - the ravens then started on the 40 and we were constantly trying to get away from our goal line - that is BS - that almost cost us this game


LOL. I can't believe we have a kicker who hasn't missed since he got here, and you're still complaining about his kickoffs.

And I don't know for sure, but it looked to me like we tried to get cute on that kick that went out of bounds. Tried to angle a kick into the corner away from Jacoby Jones and it cost us.

I am NOT complaining about his kickoffs - I'm pointing to 2 things
this is still a site where you don't have to follow along merrily :lol:


there was at least 1 poster that indicated that Danny or Mike wanted the kickoffs to be returned because they had so much confidence in the KO coverage group

THAT is STUPID

somehow the kickoffs will be improved .. but, that is for another thread ..
again - I am NOT complaining - I'm just pointing to an issue that had us in terrible field position for a long while

btw - Banks is done here :lol:
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

SJ, you won't have to worry past this season; Goodell is going to do away with kickoffs altogether. :roll:
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Posts: 7047
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:58 pm

Post by DarthMonk »

The Hogster wrote:Only a miserable attention starved loser would want to prove a point right now!!!


The Hogster wrote:So I guess nobody saw Niles Paul fumble? LOL


Making a point, are you?

Glad we won too.

DarthMonk
Hog Bowl III, V, X Champion (2011, 2013, 2018)

Hognostication Champion (2011, 2013, 2016)

Hognostibowl XII Champion (2017, 2018)


Scalp 'em, Swamp 'em,
We will take 'em big score!
Read 'em, Weep 'em Touchdown,
We want heap more!
The Hogster
#######
#######
Posts: 7225
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by The Hogster »

DarthMonk wrote:
The Hogster wrote:Only a miserable attention starved loser would want to prove a point right now!!!


The Hogster wrote:So I guess nobody saw Niles Paul fumble? LOL


Making a point, are you?

Glad we won too.

DarthMonk


Yes. I tend to make great points often. It's no secret that I supported Banks. Still do. But, that doesn't mean that I don't support Crawford. I support them both. And, Niles "Toe Finger" Paul didn't do much to make anyone at ease on kickoffs. If the Ravens guy wasn't bumbling around on that fumble recovery, we LOSE the game due to him returning kicks and Crawford never gets the chance to break that long one.

HAIL
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
Bob 0119
The Punisher
The Punisher
Posts: 2592
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Manassas

Post by Bob 0119 »

Brandon Banks has 178 return yards on 26 attempts.

Richard Crawford has 100 yards on three.
“If you grow up in metro Washington, you grow up a diehard Redskins fan. But if you hate your parents, you grow up a Cowboys fan.”-Jim Lachey
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

Deadskins wrote:SJ, you won't have to worry past this season; Goodell is going to do away with kickoffs altogether. :roll:


thanks mate - but ... do you really think that will happen?

I kind of understand the thinking, but ... kickoffs are a part of the game, no?
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

SkinsJock wrote:
Deadskins wrote:SJ, you won't have to worry past this season; Goodell is going to do away with kickoffs altogether. :roll:


thanks mate - but ... do you really think that will happen?

I kind of understand the thinking, but ... kickoffs are a part of the game, no?
... so was the bump and run... clothes line tackling... and other peasant brutishness.... once. Things change... not always for the better.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
skinsfan#33
#33
#33
Posts: 4084
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am

Post by skinsfan#33 »

[quote="Countertrey"][quote="SkinsJock"][quote="Deadskins"]SJ, you won't have to worry past this season; Goodell is going to do away with kickoffs altogether. :roll:[/quote]

thanks mate - but ... do you really think that will happen?

I kind of understand the thinking, but ... kickoffs are a part of the game, no?[/quote]... so was the bump and run... clothes line tackling... and other peasant brutishness.... once. Things change... not always for the better.[/quote]
Bump and run is still legal (in the first give yards) but regardless that and the other things you mentioned are techniques used in a play, not the an entire play (the most exciting play in football).

The NFL is screwing around with an extremely exciting part of the game and they are taking away a part of the game that is a major part of what draws people to the game and for what? They say it its to protect the players but NO ONE has provided any stats that shows that the KO is a much more injury prone play than any other play. And I'm sure that is because it is not statistically coherent than any other play.

Why not eliminate punt returns too? Because it would be retarded (just like eliminating the KO).

If the KO was statistically more dangerous than other plays the NFL woulda have the stats out thee for all to see. Since they don't, I think it is safe to say that those stats don't support eliminating the play and this is all a big dog and pony show by the NFL to make it look like they are trying to improve player safety.
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
DaSkinz Baby
Hog
Posts: 641
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:25 pm
Location: Clarksburg

Post by DaSkinz Baby »

Well I think it's a foregone conclusion that Banks is pretty much a goner............Bye Brandon sorry you didn't last longer.......Should have kept the north and south mentality and stopped trying to be Randal El.....
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

skinsfan#33 wrote:
Countertrey wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:
Deadskins wrote:SJ, you won't have to worry past this season; Goodell is going to do away with kickoffs altogether. :roll:


thanks mate - but ... do you really think that will happen?

I kind of understand the thinking, but ... kickoffs are a part of the game, no?
... so was the bump and run... clothes line tackling... and other peasant brutishness.... once. Things change... not always for the better.

Bump and run is still legal (in the first give yards).
ummm... that is NOT bump and run. Spend some time watching Pat Fischer, and Roger Wehrle, then revisit this statement.

but regardless that and the other things you mentioned are techniques used in a play, not the an entire play (the most exciting play in football).

The NFL is screwing around with an extremely exciting part of the game and they are taking away a part of the game that is a major part of what draws people to the game and for what? They say it its to protect the players but NO ONE has provided any stats that shows that the KO is a much more injury prone play than any other play. And I'm sure that is because it is not statistically coherent than any other play.

Why not eliminate punt returns too? Because it would be retarded (just like eliminating the KO).

If the KO was statistically more dangerous than other plays the NFL woulda have the stats out thee for all to see. Since they don't, I think it is safe to say that those stats don't support eliminating the play and this is all a big dog and pony show by the NFL to make it look like they are trying to improve player safety.
Yup... pretty much agree with everything else.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
User avatar
markshark84
Hog
Posts: 2642
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:44 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Post by markshark84 »

SkinsJock wrote:
Deadskins wrote:SJ, you won't have to worry past this season; Goodell is going to do away with kickoffs altogether. :roll:


thanks mate - but ... do you really think that will happen?

I kind of understand the thinking, but ... kickoffs are a part of the game, no?


I personally think that the "proposed" changes (e.g., eliminating kickoffs) to the game by the commissioner are a response/retailiation to the ensuing lawsuits against the league by former players.

Ultimately the NFL is attempting to take away any potential liability by at least putting on paper that all decisions they make are being made in the best interest of the players.

To a degree I understand it. The NFL is in a difficult spot. Previous NFL players are suing the league for injuries other players gave them because the league didn't implement policies to prevent the "violent" nature of the game. Now, the league has adjusted the rules, increased awareness, and mandated the refs to call penalties on violent plays as a way to limit their occurences; however, the current players still try to knock players out and win games. Regardless of player action --- the NFL is left holding the bag.

That said, I don't see how they could get rid of kickoffs. They could move it up even further, but not get rid of them completely. They are such a huge part of the game.
RIP Sean Taylor. You will be missed.
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

markshark84 wrote:That said, I don't see how they could get rid of kickoffs. They could move it up even further, but not get rid of them completely. They are such a huge part of the game.


Agreed. Eliminating kickoffs altogether would also eliminate onside kicks. Onside kicks can be a huge aspect of the game. Not just at the end of games when teams are behind and need another possession to even the score or win the game, onside kickoffs can also be used strategically in certain circumstances when opponents aren't expecting it. For example, like when the Saints successfully recovered a surprise onside kick to open the 2nd half of Super Bowl XLIV against the Colts.
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

I do not think they should eliminate kickoffs but trying to make a point for onside kicks is not doing much for me

If they don't exist the game will still be fine
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
User avatar
riggofan
HereComesTheDiesel
HereComesTheDiesel
Posts: 9460
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:29 pm
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Post by riggofan »

SkinsFreak wrote:
markshark84 wrote:That said, I don't see how they could get rid of kickoffs. They could move it up even further, but not get rid of them completely. They are such a huge part of the game.


Agreed. Eliminating kickoffs altogether would also eliminate onside kicks. Onside kicks can be a huge aspect of the game. Not just at the end of games when teams are behind and need another possession to even the score or win the game, onside kickoffs can also be used strategically in certain circumstances when opponents aren't expecting it. For example, like when the Saints successfully recovered a surprise onside kick to open the 2nd half of Super Bowl XLIV against the Colts.


True, but the proposal that they're talking about is actually kind of better than onside kicks. Instead of kicking off after a score, a team gets the ball at their own 30 yard line facing 4th and 15. They can either punt it away or go for it. The end of games could be pretty exciting in that scenario. Seems like teams would have a much better chance of converting a 4th and 15 than recovering an onside kick. If you think about it, a really GOOD offense could have a real chance of scoring twice in the final minute or two.

Punts end up replacing kickoffs, so its not like a team can't return one for a quick score.

Its hard to imagine the game without kickoffs, but Schiano's proposal is interesting and worth checking out. Since the ultimate goal is to improve player safety, suggestions like these deserve honest consideration.

Like Schiano points out, there used to be no forward passes in football too. Nothing says the game can't evolve.
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

riggofan wrote:
SkinsFreak wrote:
markshark84 wrote:That said, I don't see how they could get rid of kickoffs. They could move it up even further, but not get rid of them completely. They are such a huge part of the game.


Agreed. Eliminating kickoffs altogether would also eliminate onside kicks. Onside kicks can be a huge aspect of the game. Not just at the end of games when teams are behind and need another possession to even the score or win the game, onside kickoffs can also be used strategically in certain circumstances when opponents aren't expecting it. For example, like when the Saints successfully recovered a surprise onside kick to open the 2nd half of Super Bowl XLIV against the Colts.


True, but the proposal that they're talking about is actually kind of better than onside kicks. Instead of kicking off after a score, a team gets the ball at their own 30 yard line facing 4th and 15. They can either punt it away or go for it.


Good point, and I agree it could make the end of games exciting. Except, of course, when the Skins are playing with the lead late in the game and your opponent has an easier chance with a 4th and 15 to potentially win the game. Then that rule would suck... lol. The new rule would, however, eliminate the "surprise" attempt to gain possession at the beginning of games or at the start of the 3rd quarter after halftime. I know it's rarely used, but still exciting nonetheless.
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

SkinsFreak wrote:Eliminating kickoffs altogether would also eliminate onside kicks.

No they wouldn't. The proposal it that a team starts with the ball at there own 30 in a 4th and 10 or 4th and 15 situation. Typically they would punt, but they have the option of going for a first down.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Posts: 7047
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:58 pm

Post by DarthMonk »

From the beginning to the merger plus one biggie in 1994:

History of NFL Rules
1869
Rutgers and Princeton played a college soccer football game, the first ever, November 6. The game used modified London Football Association rules. During the next seven years, rugby gained favor with the major eastern schools over soccer, and modern football began to develop from rugby.
1876
At the Massasoit convention, the first rules for American football were written. Walter Camp, who would become known as the father of American football, first became involved with the game.

1898
A touchdown was changed from four points to five.

1904
A field goal was changed from five points to four.

1906
The forward pass was legalized. The first authenticated pass completion in a pro game came on October 27, when George (Peggy) Parratt of Massillon threw a completion to Dan (Bullet) Riley in a victory over a combined Benwood-Moundsville team.


1909
A field goal dropped from four points to three.

1912
A touchdown was increased from five points to six.

1922
NFL comes into existence.


1933
The NFL, which long had followed the rules of college football, made a number of significant changes from the college game for the first time and began to develop rules serving its needs and the style of play it preferred. The innovations from the 1932 championship game-inbounds line or hashmarks and goal posts on the goal lines-were adopted. Also the forward pass was legalized from anywhere behind the line of scrimmage.

1941
The league by-laws were revised to provide for playoffs in case there were ties in division races, and sudden-death overtimes in case a playoff game was tied after four quarters. An official NFL Record Manual was published for the first time.

1945
The inbounds lines or hashmarks were moved from 15 yards away from the sidelines to nearer the center of the field-20 yards from the sidelines.

1946
Free substitution was withdrawn and substitutions were limited to no more than three men at a time. Forward passes were made automatically incomplete upon striking the goal posts.

1948
Plastic helmets were prohibited. A flexible artificial tee was permitted at the kickoff.

1949
Free substitution was adopted for one year.

1950
Unlimited free substitution was restored, opening the way for the era of two platoons and specialization in pro football.

1951
The Pro Bowl game, dormant since 1942, was revived under a new format matching the all-stars of each conference at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. The American Conference defeated the National Conference 28-27, January 14. A rule was passed that no tackle, guard, or center would be eligible to catch a forward pass.

1955
The sudden-death overtime rule was used for the first time in a pre-season game between the Rams and Giants at Portland, Oregon, August 28. The Rams won 23-17 three minutes into overtime.

A rule change declared the ball dead immediately if the ball carrier touched the ground with any part of his body except his hands or feet while in the grasp of an opponent.

1956
Grabbing an opponent's facemask (other than the ball carrier) was made illegal.
Using radio receivers to communicate with players on the field was prohibited.
A natural leather ball with white end stripes replaced the white ball with black stripes for night games.

1960
The AFL adopted the two-point option on points after touchdown.

1962
Both leagues [NFL & AFL] prohibited grabbing any player's facemask. The AFL voted to make the scoreboard clock the official timer of the game.

1966
Goal posts offset from the goal line, painted bright yellow, and with uprights 20 feet above the cross-bar were made standard in the NFL.

1967
The "sling-shot" goal post and a six-foot-wide border around the field were made standard in the NFL.

1994
There is now a 2 point conversion following touchdowns (teams now have the option of passing or running for two points or kicking for one after a TD)


Just think of where we would be without this last rule change. Not here:

Image

I'd call the kickoff fundamental. The reason the game is called football is because the ball is kicked ... with the foot.

DON'T ELIMINATE KICKOFFS.
Hog Bowl III, V, X Champion (2011, 2013, 2018)

Hognostication Champion (2011, 2013, 2016)

Hognostibowl XII Champion (2017, 2018)


Scalp 'em, Swamp 'em,
We will take 'em big score!
Read 'em, Weep 'em Touchdown,
We want heap more!
User avatar
DaveD1420
Hog
Posts: 386
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 11:25 pm
Location: Grand Forks, ND

Post by DaveD1420 »

I think the name origin is more than that. That said, whenever my soccer friends say that it should be called something other than football, I tell them that the primary way of moving the ball is running with it (even in modern times with passing)...by using one's FEET. Also, the ball is approx. a foot long: foot-ball. haha
skinsfan#33
#33
#33
Posts: 4084
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am

Post by skinsfan#33 »

Countertrey wrote:
skinsfan#33 wrote:
Countertrey wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:
Deadskins wrote:SJ, you won't have to worry past this season; Goodell is going to do away with kickoffs altogether. :roll:


thanks mate - but ... do you really think that will happen?

I kind of understand the thinking, but ... kickoffs are a part of the game, no?
... so was the bump and run... clothes line tackling... and other peasant brutishness.... once. Things change... not always for the better.

Bump and run is still legal (in the first give yards).
ummm... that is NOT bump and run. Spend some time watching Pat Fischer, and Roger Wehrle, then revisit this statement.

but regardless that and the other things you mentioned are techniques used in a play, not the an entire play (the most exciting play in football).

The NFL is screwing around with an extremely exciting part of the game and they are taking away a part of the game that is a major part of what draws people to the game and for what? They say it its to protect the players but NO ONE has provided any stats that shows that the KO is a much more injury prone play than any other play. And I'm sure that is because it is not statistically coherent than any other play.

Why not eliminate punt returns too? Because it would be retarded (just like eliminating the KO).

If the KO was statistically more dangerous than other plays the NFL woulda have the stats out thee for all to see. Since they don't, I think it is safe to say that those stats don't support eliminating the play and this is all a big dog and pony show by the NFL to make it look like they are trying to improve player safety.
Yup... pretty much agree with everything else.

The bump and ruin comment was meant to be a little tongue and cheek. The leg whip is the play that corners today would kill for!
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
skinsfan#33
#33
#33
Posts: 4084
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am

Post by skinsfan#33 »

Countertrey wrote:
skinsfan#33 wrote:
Countertrey wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:
Deadskins wrote:SJ, you won't have to worry past this season; Goodell is going to do away with kickoffs altogether. :roll:


thanks mate - but ... do you really think that will happen?

I kind of understand the thinking, but ... kickoffs are a part of the game, no?
... so was the bump and run... clothes line tackling... and other peasant brutishness.... once. Things change... not always for the better.

Bump and run is still legal (in the first give yards).
ummm... that is NOT bump and run. Spend some time watching Pat Fischer, and Roger Wehrle, then revisit this statement.

but regardless that and the other things you mentioned are techniques used in a play, not the an entire play (the most exciting play in football).

The NFL is screwing around with an extremely exciting part of the game and they are taking away a part of the game that is a major part of what draws people to the game and for what? They say it its to protect the players but NO ONE has provided any stats that shows that the KO is a much more injury prone play than any other play. And I'm sure that is because it is not statistically coherent than any other play.

Why not eliminate punt returns too? Because it would be retarded (just like eliminating the KO).

If the KO was statistically more dangerous than other plays the NFL woulda have the stats out thee for all to see. Since they don't, I think it is safe to say that those stats don't support eliminating the play and this is all a big dog and pony show by the NFL to make it look like they are trying to improve player safety.
Yup... pretty much agree with everything else.

The bump and ruin comment was meant to be a little tongue and cheek. The leg whip is the play that corners today would kill for!
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
User avatar
riggofan
HereComesTheDiesel
HereComesTheDiesel
Posts: 9460
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:29 pm
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Post by riggofan »

DarthMonk wrote:I'd call the kickoff fundamental.


meh. Kickoffs account for 6% of the plays during a game. The past two years only 50% of them are actually returned.

There's no question that the kickoff is fundamental. The question is: is it really essential?

If the league decided that cutting out the kickoff would really reduce the number of spinal injuries, concussions, etc;, I wouldn't cry about it. And you certainly can't blame a guy like Greg Schiano for wanting to do something about it considering what happened to Eric LeGrand. I think people are a little too guick to get all grumpy-old-man-get-off-my-lawn.
User avatar
FLWSkin
Hog
Posts: 311
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: St. Robert, MO

Post by FLWSkin »

Not to be too grumpy, but someone could get paralysed on any play. If everyone is that worried about it, eliminate football all together.
User avatar
riggofan
HereComesTheDiesel
HereComesTheDiesel
Posts: 9460
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:29 pm
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Post by riggofan »

FLWSkin wrote:Not to be too grumpy, but someone could get paralysed on any play. If everyone is that worried about it, eliminate football all together.


What kind of logic is that? People still die in car accidents, so why wear seat belts at all? Come on, man.

Kickoffs account for 6% of all NFL plays, but they account for 17% of all those most serious injuries. That's ridiculously disproportionate. If you can cut down the risk of somebody getting paralysed by 20% with minimal impact on the game, you don't think that is worth at least considering with an open mind?
User avatar
FLWSkin
Hog
Posts: 311
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: St. Robert, MO

Post by FLWSkin »

Its perfect logic. The NFL is doing all this to eliminate lawsuits by former players because of concussions. If you don't want any football related injuries, ban football. Or, if you want the money, fame and stuff that goes with football, admit it is going to ruin you physically and just take the money and accept it or don't play. To me, everything else, like eliminating kickoffs, is just dancing around the obvious.
User avatar
riggofan
HereComesTheDiesel
HereComesTheDiesel
Posts: 9460
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:29 pm
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Post by riggofan »

FLWSkin wrote:Its perfect logic. The NFL is doing all this to eliminate lawsuits by former players because of concussions. If you don't want any football related injuries, ban football. Or, if you want the money, fame and stuff that goes with football, admit it is going to ruin you physically and just take the money and accept it or don't play. To me, everything else, like eliminating kickoffs, is just dancing around the obvious.


Sounds like a realistic plan.
Post Reply