SkinsJock wrote:riggofan wrote:SkinsJock wrote::lol: we can do better WITHOUT Kyle![]()
Kyle is not terrible but we'd be better off without him![]()
actually - I'd rather have Haslett than Kyle![]()
Really?? hah. I'd be a lot more in favor of a new defensive coordinator if somebody really good was available. I'm not sure what evidence there is that we would be better off without Kyle.
Personally I liked all of the reports about Kyle working with RGIII in the offseason. I don't think we had even drafted RGIII yet and Kyle was down in Waco helping him get up to speed on the playbook.
riggo - I think Kyles a good OC - It's just that I think we could do better with someone else
we have a QB in RG3 that is not like anybody else - this kid is something really special
let's face it - Mike is most likely here for another year and Kyle is here with him - I'm just looking forward to having RG3 with better guys as HC, OC and DC
not really a big deal - it's just me - we're going to be fine with these guys and Mike deserves some credo just for bringing in RG3
we're going to eventually see a really good OC in here and that will be special
I'm just not a Kyle fan .. I just want to get to 8-8 or 9-7 and get ready for next season ...
IMHO - we're looking a whole lot better than we did in spite of Kyle
I can't figure out if you are being serious or if trying to fill the troll void on the site or if someone skipped some "medication" in your brownies.
You haven't addressed the fact that the 2011 offense was way more productive than it had any right to be based on the bottom five talent.
Or the fact that it its Kyle's plays and play call timing that gets average (at best) recievers and TEs wide open! Yes, RG3 makes a big difference but Kyle didn't have him in Houston, where the Texans had the #1 offense in the NFL!