Skins - Falcons postgame discussion thread
-
- Hog
- Posts: 641
- youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:25 pm
- Location: Clarksburg
Redskins offense need to act like they are behind 14 points.
Because as long as Jim Hasbeen is here we will lose thanks to him. He sucks Panthers 8 sacks Redskins NONE......
-
- the 'mudge
- Posts: 16632
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
- Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine
Re: Redskins offense need to act like they are behind 14 poi
No defense will hold up when on the field for 81 plays. that's EIGHTY ONE. Atlanta TOP: 37.01DaSkinz Baby wrote:Because as long as Jim Hasbeen is here we will lose thanks to him. He sucks Panthers 8 sacks Redskins NONE......
Haslett's game plan was perfect for Atlanta. It required the offense to hold up it's side of the deal, and win the TOP. It could have... it did not...
This loss falls squarely on the shoulders of Kyle Shanahan. When you have a running back ripping off runs at a nearly 10 ypc clip, you MAKE THE OTHER TEAM STOP IT. You don't get cute.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
-
- FanFromAnnapolis
- Posts: 12025
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
- Location: on the bandwagon
- Contact:
Re: Redskins offense need to act like they are behind 14 poi
Our defense played a good game today. (Have you ever seen Atanta play before?)DaSkinz Baby wrote:Because as long as Jim Hasbeen is here we will lose thanks to him. He sucks Panthers 8 sacks Redskins NONE......
This loss was on the offense. Overall I thought it was a pretty good effort by the 'Skins. But against a team like Atlanta you need to bring a more consistent offensive effort.
Re: Redskins offense need to act like they are behind 14 poi
I missed the first 2 1/2 quarters but I was getting score updates and it's not like we were behind and Morris was averaging 6.1 ypc and only had 19 carries??? RUN THE DARN BALL!!!! If we would have held the ball more with more running the D would have been in better shape to make those tackles that I was so critical of at the end of the game. I really hope Kyle learns from this cuz daddy ain't gonna fire his boy...Countertrey wrote:No defense will hold up when on the field for 81 plays. that's EIGHTY ONE. Atlanta TOP: 37.01DaSkinz Baby wrote:Because as long as Jim Hasbeen is here we will lose thanks to him. He sucks Panthers 8 sacks Redskins NONE......
Haslett's game plan was perfect for Atlanta. It required the offense to hold up it's side of the deal, and win the TOP. It could have... it did not...
This loss falls squarely on the shoulders of Kyle Shanahan. When you have a running back ripping off runs at a nearly 10 ypc clip, you MAKE THE OTHER TEAM STOP IT. You don't get cute.

I'm talking about the horrible play calling more so the 30 carries that Bradshaw had than the 200 yardsoneman56 wrote:you have to convert 3rd downs and sustain drives to keep handing the ball off.TimSkin wrote:The Skins need to take a note from the Giants: Ahmad Bradshaw 30 Carries 200 yards 6.7 ypc 1 TD

i know and Alfred would've had more carries had we converted 3rd downs.TimSkin wrote:I'm talking about the horrible play calling more so the 30 carries that Bradshaw had than the 200 yardsoneman56 wrote:you have to convert 3rd downs and sustain drives to keep handing the ball off.TimSkin wrote:The Skins need to take a note from the Giants: Ahmad Bradshaw 30 Carries 200 yards 6.7 ypc 1 TD
-
- Hog
- Posts: 2370
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:56 am
Lookie here .... we can theorize and analyze till hell freezes over about this thing or that thing ... but the bottom line still rests with the HC.
This team is almost an entirely new roster from the team Mike inherited. He built the staff and built the roster and aside from some rather EXCEPTIONAL play from two rookies ... miraculous play from the QB .... we're 0-5 and a complete disaster rather than just same old story.
8 straight losses at home ... a worse record than Jim Zorn (who did slightly better with a whole lot less talent) and that's where the problem resides. It's as simple as that. No excuses, no cry baby stuff, no riding on old reputation that was already failing before he got here (which is why Denver fired him).
His Son sucks as an OC ... predictable to the point of failure, and inexplicable in switching from what works for no apparent reason. The impressive offensive performance prior to today was almost entirely based on RG3's ability .... yet the Falcons apparently figured out how to stop the offense's cute little college diversions, but couldn't do a thing to stop the running game ... so what do we do? We do them a favor and stop our own running game.
We have a staff that made a huge mistake on the Kicker ... everybody but them knew it when they did it .... and yet even after last week when there could be no remaining doubt in a sane person's mind, they refused to fix it this week because these ego maniacs refuse to admit being wrong about anything.
Now if this were some new development, then we might be able to write it off as a aberration ... but it's not. We have had the QB carousel with McNabb to Grossman, Grossman to Beck to Grossman again, and last year's "I'll stake my reputation on him (Beck)" who turned out to be an unmitigated disaster .... and I won't try to go into all of the other questionable personnel decisions.
This is more than what got Zorn not just fired, but run out of town. Shanahan inspires no confidence ... either Shanahan.
Put these two knuckle heads in charge of the Sahara Desert, and they'd figure out how to make sand fail.
This team is almost an entirely new roster from the team Mike inherited. He built the staff and built the roster and aside from some rather EXCEPTIONAL play from two rookies ... miraculous play from the QB .... we're 0-5 and a complete disaster rather than just same old story.
8 straight losses at home ... a worse record than Jim Zorn (who did slightly better with a whole lot less talent) and that's where the problem resides. It's as simple as that. No excuses, no cry baby stuff, no riding on old reputation that was already failing before he got here (which is why Denver fired him).
His Son sucks as an OC ... predictable to the point of failure, and inexplicable in switching from what works for no apparent reason. The impressive offensive performance prior to today was almost entirely based on RG3's ability .... yet the Falcons apparently figured out how to stop the offense's cute little college diversions, but couldn't do a thing to stop the running game ... so what do we do? We do them a favor and stop our own running game.
We have a staff that made a huge mistake on the Kicker ... everybody but them knew it when they did it .... and yet even after last week when there could be no remaining doubt in a sane person's mind, they refused to fix it this week because these ego maniacs refuse to admit being wrong about anything.
Now if this were some new development, then we might be able to write it off as a aberration ... but it's not. We have had the QB carousel with McNabb to Grossman, Grossman to Beck to Grossman again, and last year's "I'll stake my reputation on him (Beck)" who turned out to be an unmitigated disaster .... and I won't try to go into all of the other questionable personnel decisions.
This is more than what got Zorn not just fired, but run out of town. Shanahan inspires no confidence ... either Shanahan.
Put these two knuckle heads in charge of the Sahara Desert, and they'd figure out how to make sand fail.
-
- #######
- Posts: 7225
- Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
- Location: Washington D.C.
-
- tribe
- Posts: 7075
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:02 pm
- Location: SURF CITY, HB, CALI *** Occasionally flying into a SUPERNOVA
-
- 09 Champ
- Posts: 1262
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:24 pm
- Location: Upstate NY
-
- ch1
- Posts: 3634
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:01 pm
- Location: virginia beach
Garcon and co. dropped too many balls today, killing drives. We've got to get a new kicker...the misses demoralize. One thing I've noticed that others might argue with. Our running game seems to weaken as the game progresses, probably because our OL tires and our back ups aren't up to their jobs. By game's end, we usually have to rely on RG3. It's not just a matter of failure to stick with what's working. At the start of games I'm saying run, run, run. By the end I'm cursing every time we try it. So far this season, Garcon has been a disappointment.TeeterSalad wrote:I was reviewing the play that RG3 got hurt, seems like if he stayed in the pocket for just another second Garcon was open in the endzone. He'll surely learn from this.
-
- the 'mudge
- Posts: 16632
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
- Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine
I won't argue... However, Atlanta did not ever become effective at stopping the run... Morris only ran 18 times. Grant ran only once. Clearly, we did NOT run enough.crazyhorse1 wrote:Garcon and co. dropped too many balls today, killing drives. We've got to get a new kicker...the misses demoralize. One thing I've noticed that others might argue with. Our running game seems to weaken as the game progresses, probably because our OL tires and our back ups aren't up to their jobs. By game's end, we usually have to rely on RG3. It's not just a matter of failure to stick with what's working. At the start of games I'm saying run, run, run. By the end I'm cursing every time we try it. So far this season, Garcon has been a disappointment.TeeterSalad wrote:I was reviewing the play that RG3 got hurt, seems like if he stayed in the pocket for just another second Garcon was open in the endzone. He'll surely learn from this.
In general, so far this year, early in games, we can pound the left side very effectively... Williams is a monster in the rush attack... but runs to the right gain much less... To stay effective, you have to be able to run to both sides... You are an old lineman... you know this. You have to be able to run well to both sides... or the opponent will simply adjust some support over to the side that is working, to shut it down, as well. Frankly, however... I don't believe that was the case today. Atlanta never shut Morris down... Kyle did.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
Re: Redskins offense need to act like they are behind 14 poi
+1Countertrey wrote:No defense will hold up when on the field for 81 plays. that's EIGHTY ONE. Atlanta TOP: 37.01DaSkinz Baby wrote:Because as long as Jim Hasbeen is here we will lose thanks to him. He sucks Panthers 8 sacks Redskins NONE......
Haslett's game plan was perfect for Atlanta. It required the offense to hold up it's side of the deal, and win the TOP. It could have... it did not...
This loss falls squarely on the shoulders of Kyle Shanahan. When you have a running back ripping off runs at a nearly 10 ypc clip, you MAKE THE OTHER TEAM STOP IT. You don't get cute.
Good game plan by Haz for the defense. The defense had very little pass rush, but the secondary held its own. This seems like the formula for success for this defense. Less blitzing and more guys back in coverage.
They seemed to give Matt Ryan fits.
Now watch Haz go back to his old ways against the Vikes - blitzing out of control.
I place the "play down to the level of the comp" and "play up to the level of the comp" phenomenum squarely on the coaches.
The players played just as hard against the Rams, Bengals, Bucs as they did against the Saints and the Falcons.
Today's defensive game plan would have worked against the Bengals and the Rams. With the support of the Offense in those games, victory was assured.
They seemed to give Matt Ryan fits.
Now watch Haz go back to his old ways against the Vikes - blitzing out of control.
I place the "play down to the level of the comp" and "play up to the level of the comp" phenomenum squarely on the coaches.
The players played just as hard against the Rams, Bengals, Bucs as they did against the Saints and the Falcons.
Today's defensive game plan would have worked against the Bengals and the Rams. With the support of the Offense in those games, victory was assured.
-
- ~~~~~~
- Posts: 10323
- Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 9:59 am
- Location: Canada
Offense:
- No question, RGIII is the engine.
- Morris will have an +1000 season this year, no problem.
- Too many drops and fluky catches by our receivers, including F. Davis.
- The rush is getting to our QB from the right side. We need help at OL.
- Kirk is good but he is no RGIII.
- RGIII should learn not to gamble like that. I know that he was trying to slide and the hit was probably a roughing penalty not called but man, please do not gamble with your head.
Defense:
- Kerrigan! what can I say? Played like a pro-bowler and he provided whatever rush we had. Twice INTs for TD in his career.
- Cofield played his best game this year imo.
- Josh Wilson turned his WORST performance after catches by opposing receivers. He grabbed nothing but air in four or five receptions made in front of him. If they burn him, at least he should make the tackle. Somebody else had to bail him out after he ended on the ground watching opposing receivers elude his "tackle".
- I will say it for the first time in my life: father time is catching up with London Fletcher. Great player and leader just not playing like he did last year or years before.
- Garcon was rusty.
Overall:
Not impressed with our defense game plan. I know that we had "better" coverage but we had it at the expense of real consistent pressure on Ryan who had enough time to pick us apart.
It has been said before in this thread and elsewhere: Why not run until they can stop us? Why not control the clock and the pace of the game on offense?
These Redskins are a joy to watch, win or lose. This is not our year but we will make it difficult to anybody who wants to win against us.
- No question, RGIII is the engine.
- Morris will have an +1000 season this year, no problem.
- Too many drops and fluky catches by our receivers, including F. Davis.
- The rush is getting to our QB from the right side. We need help at OL.
- Kirk is good but he is no RGIII.
- RGIII should learn not to gamble like that. I know that he was trying to slide and the hit was probably a roughing penalty not called but man, please do not gamble with your head.
Defense:
- Kerrigan! what can I say? Played like a pro-bowler and he provided whatever rush we had. Twice INTs for TD in his career.
- Cofield played his best game this year imo.
- Josh Wilson turned his WORST performance after catches by opposing receivers. He grabbed nothing but air in four or five receptions made in front of him. If they burn him, at least he should make the tackle. Somebody else had to bail him out after he ended on the ground watching opposing receivers elude his "tackle".
- I will say it for the first time in my life: father time is catching up with London Fletcher. Great player and leader just not playing like he did last year or years before.
- Garcon was rusty.
Overall:
Not impressed with our defense game plan. I know that we had "better" coverage but we had it at the expense of real consistent pressure on Ryan who had enough time to pick us apart.
It has been said before in this thread and elsewhere: Why not run until they can stop us? Why not control the clock and the pace of the game on offense?
These Redskins are a joy to watch, win or lose. This is not our year but we will make it difficult to anybody who wants to win against us.
Daniel Snyder has defined incompetence, failure and greed to true Washington Redskins fans for over a decade and a half. Stay away from football operations !!!
Re: Redskins offense need to act like they are behind 14 poi
You keep saying "nearly 10 ypc clip." At one point he had 87 yards on 8 carries. That's better than 10 yards a clip. This totally pissed me off. What does Kyle not understand about having a great running day means you win the game? It's coaching 101.Countertrey wrote:No defense will hold up when on the field for 81 plays. that's EIGHTY ONE. Atlanta TOP: 37.01DaSkinz Baby wrote:Because as long as Jim Hasbeen is here we will lose thanks to him. He sucks Panthers 8 sacks Redskins NONE......
Haslett's game plan was perfect for Atlanta. It required the offense to hold up it's side of the deal, and win the TOP. It could have... it did not...
This loss falls squarely on the shoulders of Kyle Shanahan. When you have a running back ripping off runs at a nearly 10 ypc clip, you MAKE THE OTHER TEAM STOP IT. You don't get cute.

Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.
Hail to the Redskins!
-
- #33
- Posts: 4084
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am
I'm a Haz hate, I never wanted him hired, but the game plan yesterday was excellent. You could tell the Falcons had prepared for our normal blitzkrieg frenzy. If our offense had played like it had in the past we would have won easily.
The only negative I can say about the defensive game plan is Haz could have tossed in a blitz invert in a while, but the defense did their part yesterday!
The offensive game plan was terrible. You have a running game that is working, keep feeding AM the ball. Atlanta never did stop that pitch left play. I think they ran it about 3 or 4 times and the least number of yards it gained was 9!
What happen to the option? I think they ran it twice and RG3 looked like he had no intention of keeping the ball on either. One play a third an one (i think) they ran it and Griffin would have easily picked up the first and a lot more if he had kept it.
The option and they that of Robert running ods what has made this offense go. They have to keep running it. Im but dating a lot, but it ness to be used at least once a 1/4 if not once a drive.
The only negative I can say about the defensive game plan is Haz could have tossed in a blitz invert in a while, but the defense did their part yesterday!
The offensive game plan was terrible. You have a running game that is working, keep feeding AM the ball. Atlanta never did stop that pitch left play. I think they ran it about 3 or 4 times and the least number of yards it gained was 9!
What happen to the option? I think they ran it twice and RG3 looked like he had no intention of keeping the ball on either. One play a third an one (i think) they ran it and Griffin would have easily picked up the first and a lot more if he had kept it.
The option and they that of Robert running ods what has made this offense go. They have to keep running it. Im but dating a lot, but it ness to be used at least once a 1/4 if not once a drive.
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren
"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier
RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren
"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier
RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
I will give you your due here. You have come out from the start of the Shanny regime that Haz is not the guy. I am not joining you as a hater, but I am joining you with the points that you made.skinsfan#33 wrote:I'm a Haz hate, I never wanted him hired, but the game plan yesterday was excellent. You could tell the Falcons had prepared for our normal blitzkrieg frenzy. If our offense had played like it had in the past we would have won easily.
I do agree with you that the game plan was excellent. We held there potent offense to 24 points with one offense tied behind our backs.
This is the problem I have with Haz. He claims that the "Steeler" 3-4 is a D that QBs never know where the Blitz is coming from. The blitz when it rarely came was always easily picked up.The only negative I can say about the defensive game plan is Haz could have tossed in a blitz invert in a while, but the defense did their part yesterday!
Agree with you about the offense.The offensive game plan was terrible. You have a running game that is working, keep feeding AM the ball. Atlanta never did stop that pitch left play. I think they ran it about 3 or 4 times and the least number of yards it gained was 9!
What happen to the option? I think they ran it twice and RG3 looked like he had no intention of keeping the ball on either. One play a third an one (i think) they ran it and Griffin would have easily picked up the first and a lot more if he had kept it.
The option and they that of Robert running ods what has made this offense go. They have to keep running it. Im but dating a lot, but it ness to be used at least once a 1/4 if not once a drive.
[/quote]
I liked most of the defensive play - except for the fact that nobody got pressure on the QB. You consistantly give that guy 3-4 seconds and that opens thier playbook up to all options. It was a testiment of our pass coverage that Atlanta didn't score every time they touched the ball.
I thought the offense boring, but it was the right one for that game. Hand the ball to Alfred and let him pound his way downfield - he even made a couple runs up the middle. And running up the middle is what we need to do, running to the left wears our guys out - they have to do 30yd windsprints. Looks good on tv, but we don't have the spare guys to rotate in to keep everybody fresh.
Cundif has to go, he killed the momentum. They should be cleaning his locker out as we speak and send his stuff to him UPS, COD - he has no business walking the same corridors as the team players.
RG has no business running the ball, he has to get that mentality out of his head. He can't do it all. And he is not playing on a college campus - the guys on the other side of the line are being paid to rip his head off and they are very capable of doing exactly that. Robert has to learn to use his smarts and other players to get the job done or he just won't make it.
It was a hard fought game.
I thought the offense boring, but it was the right one for that game. Hand the ball to Alfred and let him pound his way downfield - he even made a couple runs up the middle. And running up the middle is what we need to do, running to the left wears our guys out - they have to do 30yd windsprints. Looks good on tv, but we don't have the spare guys to rotate in to keep everybody fresh.
Cundif has to go, he killed the momentum. They should be cleaning his locker out as we speak and send his stuff to him UPS, COD - he has no business walking the same corridors as the team players.
RG has no business running the ball, he has to get that mentality out of his head. He can't do it all. And he is not playing on a college campus - the guys on the other side of the line are being paid to rip his head off and they are very capable of doing exactly that. Robert has to learn to use his smarts and other players to get the job done or he just won't make it.
It was a hard fought game.
Molon Labe
-
- kazoo
- Posts: 10293
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
- Location: Kazmania
Re: Redskins offense need to act like they are behind 14 poi
I totally agree, the offensive play calling was horrible. Wouldn't it be nice if Haslett and Kyle could be good one week at the same time?Countertrey wrote:No defense will hold up when on the field for 81 plays. that's EIGHTY ONE. Atlanta TOP: 37.01DaSkinz Baby wrote:Because as long as Jim Hasbeen is here we will lose thanks to him. He sucks Panthers 8 sacks Redskins NONE......
Haslett's game plan was perfect for Atlanta. It required the offense to hold up it's side of the deal, and win the TOP. It could have... it did not...
This loss falls squarely on the shoulders of Kyle Shanahan. When you have a running back ripping off runs at a nearly 10 ypc clip, you MAKE THE OTHER TEAM STOP IT. You don't get cute.
Last edited by KazooSkinsFan on Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Hail to the Redskins!
Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him
Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him
Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way