riggofan wrote:skinsfan#33 wrote:riggofan wrote:skinsfan#33 wrote:What did yesterday prove? Nothing! It only proves that we have a 1 for 3 or several 3 for 4 days coming. Cundiff is what he is; a 76% kicker!
Not sure it works like that man. Gano was a 100% kicker in 2009.
That is why I'm not talking about one year, I'm talking about what Cundiff is over his 8 or 9 year career.
Gano was trending up and Cundiff was trending down (back to his Norm).
Its just a ludicrous statement over a meaningless number. You're taking the average of his FGM over his entire career and claiming that number tells us something meaningful, which it doesn't.
Gano was "trending up"? He missed 11 kicks in 2010 and then missed 10 kicks + an extra point in 2011. That's a 68% kicker improving to 75%.
Cundiff missed 5 kicks in 2009. 3 kicks in 2010 and 9 kicks in 2011. He hasn't missed 10 kicks in a season in his entire 10 year career.
Everybody who watched Gano the past two years knows he was horrible. You can hardly blame Shanahan for not wanting to ride it out with Gano in year three. If Cundiff continues to send the ball out of the endzone on kickoffs and misses less than 10 kicks this year, then Shanny upgraded the kicker position.
He might have been horrible, but why replace him with someone worse?
I have no idea what you are talking about with respect to a kicker's past kicking averages has nothing to do with predicting how he might kick in the future. How can you not get that? It isn't a hard concept!
2011 Gano did miss 10 kicks. Five of those 10 were blocked (no fault to Gano's - just ask Rocca!) and one was botched so badly by Rocca that Gano had to stop, wait for Rocca to get the ball placed (tilted way to the side) and then kick the ball while he was standing still. Shockingly he missed. So he missed 10 kicks, 5 of those were blocked and one was a botched hold. Take those six kick out of the equation and he conncted on 31 out of 35 kicks, or 88.6 % (or pretty close to Condiffs PB season).
So Gano only missed 4 kicks when the rest of the kicking team did their job correctly and the kicking team missed 6 kicks when Gano did his job correctly! When the rest of the kicking team is responsible for MORE missed FG than the KICKER do you have a bad kicker or a bad kicking team?
It is OK, when Condiff finishes well below 80% and has 4 or 5 kicks blocked (because Danny Smith obviously hasn't fixed that problem!) everyone will be saying maybe the problem wasn't the kicker!
By the way the extra point was blocked too!