JSPB22 wrote:WHat does that picture mean? Did he have a really good showing durin passing camp, or did you just want to get post 1000 under your belt? Congrats on the milestone, BTW.
Whoa, I hadn't noticed, actually. I was just making my choice known. I'd start Brunell.
Ramsey is the future for the Skins as long as we can keep him. He will be a great QB in the NFL for a long time, and I don't want him to go some other team and QB them to greatness in a few years because of any bad blood with the Skins now.
Does anybody remember that Brunell was benched in favor of Leftwich in Jacksonville last year, even when he was healthy? Ramsey is MUCH better than Leftwich, and he is the future. Gibbs should start Ramsey and keep Brunell around as a very capable backup.
Of course Gibbs and the other coaches clearly know more about this than I do from watching the players practice every day, but I definitely want Ramsey to start
Washington Redskins fans know and understand football. They want good football. Expectations here are very, very high. That's good.
-Joe Bugel
JSPB22 wrote:I want to see what Ramsey can do if he actually had some protection and time to throw.
I strongly agree with you. The kid will become very nice, but he does need to work on his footwork and being a quicker decision maker in releasing the ball. I LOVE Gibbs, so I am trusting the QB comp is wide open as he suggested. With that said may th ebest man win...come on Rambo!
Jacksonville was rebuilding last season. Brunell is by far the better choice, and it's really not even close. Number of the day? 85.2. That's Brunell's career quarterback rating, and in limited play last year, he put up 89.7. Compare that to Ramsey's 75.8 last season.
Brunell is one of the best quarterback of the 90's, and he is the perfect fit for Gibbs. I don't even think there is a quarterback controversy, as much as we would like to see one...