Deadskins wrote:I am too, and you wouldn't know this, because you didn't participate back in the early days when we had a program tracking the results, but the Monday night tiebreaker was kept as a running total that broke ties on the season results as well. Wouldn't want to do it manually, but there definitely was a tiebreaking system in place.
So either it was not in place last year or Hoss (the man who ran it in 2011) was wrong ... which would make me wrong (though I was quoting "the horse's mouth" as it were).
Got any documentation? I at least have a quote from Hoss.
Oh, and stop top posting her threads!
DarthMonk
Hog Bowl III, V, X Champion (2011, 2013, 2018)
Hognostication Champion (2011, 2013, 2016)
Hognostibowl XII Champion (2017, 2018)
Scalp 'em, Swamp 'em, We will take 'em big score! Read 'em, Weep 'em Touchdown, We want heap more!
Deadskins wrote:I am too, and you wouldn't know this, because you didn't participate back in the early days when we had a program tracking the results, but the Monday night tiebreaker was kept as a running total that broke ties on the season results as well. Wouldn't want to do it manually, but there definitely was a tiebreaking system in place.
So either it was not in place last year or Hoss (the man who ran it in 2011) was wrong ... which would make me wrong (though I was quoting "the horse's mouth" as it were).
Got any documentation? I at least have a quote from Hoss.
Deadskins wrote:I am too, and you wouldn't know this, because you didn't participate back in the early days when we had a program tracking the results, but the Monday night tiebreaker was kept as a running total that broke ties on the season results as well. Wouldn't want to do it manually, but there definitely was a tiebreaking system in place.
So either it was not in place last year or Hoss (the man who ran it in 2011) was wrong ... which would make me wrong (though I was quoting "the horse's mouth" as it were).
Got any documentation? I at least have a quote from Hoss.
Deadskins wrote:I am too, and you wouldn't know this, because you didn't participate back in the early days when we had a program tracking the results, but the Monday night tiebreaker was kept as a running total that broke ties on the season results as well. Wouldn't want to do it manually, but there definitely was a tiebreaking system in place.
So either it was not in place last year or Hoss (the man who ran it in 2011) was wrong ... which would make me wrong (though I was quoting "the horse's mouth" as it were).
Got any documentation? I at least have a quote from Hoss.
Deadskins wrote:I am too, and you wouldn't know this, because you didn't participate back in the early days when we had a program tracking the results, but the Monday night tiebreaker was kept as a running total that broke ties on the season results as well. Wouldn't want to do it manually, but there definitely was a tiebreaking system in place.
So either it was not in place last year or Hoss (the man who ran it in 2011) was wrong ... which would make me wrong (though I was quoting "the horse's mouth" as it were).
Got any documentation? I at least have a quote from Hoss.
You got me on post padding but where's the season-long tie-break rule?
Is it the TB average between 6th and 7th?
Were you running it then?
Did Hoss take over?
Yes, the TB average was used as a seasonal tie break. No, I never ran the competition. Hoss took over when the program broke down. Many thanks, BTW, Hoss!
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.
Deadskins wrote:I am too, and you wouldn't know this, because you didn't participate back in the early days when we had a program tracking the results, but the Monday night tiebreaker was kept as a running total that broke ties on the season results as well. Wouldn't want to do it manually, but there definitely was a tiebreaking system in place.
So either it was not in place last year or Hoss (the man who ran it in 2011) was wrong ... which would make me wrong (though I was quoting "the horse's mouth" as it were).
Got any documentation? I at least have a quote from Hoss.
Deadskins wrote:I am too, and you wouldn't know this, because you didn't participate back in the early days when we had a program tracking the results, but the Monday night tiebreaker was kept as a running total that broke ties on the season results as well. Wouldn't want to do it manually, but there definitely was a tiebreaking system in place.
So either it was not in place last year or Hoss (the man who ran it in 2011) was wrong ... which would make me wrong (though I was quoting "the horse's mouth" as it were).
Got any documentation? I at least have a quote from Hoss.
Deadskins wrote:I am too, and you wouldn't know this, because you didn't participate back in the early days when we had a program tracking the results, but the Monday night tiebreaker was kept as a running total that broke ties on the season results as well. Wouldn't want to do it manually, but there definitely was a tiebreaking system in place.
So either it was not in place last year or Hoss (the man who ran it in 2011) was wrong ... which would make me wrong (though I was quoting "the horse's mouth" as it were).
Got any documentation? I at least have a quote from Hoss.
Look, if you want an aviator you probably should own a plane. Do you? You are also likely to need a good deal of money as aviators are typically not very cheap.
Good luck!
DarthMonk
Hog Bowl III, V, X Champion (2011, 2013, 2018)
Hognostication Champion (2011, 2013, 2016)
Hognostibowl XII Champion (2017, 2018)
Scalp 'em, Swamp 'em, We will take 'em big score! Read 'em, Weep 'em Touchdown, We want heap more!
Hey, Deadman. Any idea who wrote the code back then? Are you a computer sci dude?
I actually like that tie-break better. It rewards good predicting of Monday Night totals throughout the year. The ESPN method simply rewards a strong finish - as if later weeks mean more than early ones when Hognosticating.
DarthMonk
Hog Bowl III, V, X Champion (2011, 2013, 2018)
Hognostication Champion (2011, 2013, 2016)
Hognostibowl XII Champion (2017, 2018)
Scalp 'em, Swamp 'em, We will take 'em big score! Read 'em, Weep 'em Touchdown, We want heap more!
DarthMonk wrote:Hey, Deadman. Any idea who wrote the code back then? Are you a computer sci dude?
I am, but I have no idea who wrote the code. If I had written it, we'd still be using it today, and I might have a championship under my belt. (I have no idea where SJ* and I stood tie-breaker-wise).
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
if it doesn't work by next Wednesday. I'll post the picks here
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
ACW wrote:.... You know, it's funny. I ALWAYS pick against the 'Skins. That way, if they win great, if they lose, well, at least I get a point.
that's NOT funny - what a great way to support your team = NOT - have at it
I'm realistic about the fact that the Redskins will lose some games but I would never pick against them
especially in a 'free' pool that's amongst other Redskins fans - WHY?
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Justice Hog wrote:Just joined under my "real" name - FEFARREN.
G'day mate - from what I can see, you are "in" as Justice Hog
best to you from Bethany Beach
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
