Countertrey wrote:ICEMAN wrote: I know we are still upset about the 4th and 25 last year...but truthfully, it was a bad call by our D Coordinator, which exposed our lone D. Hall. It's all good!!!!!
This is, simply, wrong. The play you note is merely the most glaring of the MULTIPLE examples where Hall got burned by an elite receiver who understood that Hall INVARIABLY bites on a good outside headfake, especially when Hall is maintaining inside position... because, that means he is looking for a route to jump.
There are times to take such a risk...
4th and 25, with the game in hand, and no help deep is NOT such a time. Hall is, indeed, high risk, high reward... on the other hand, Haslett's D requires a cornerback to actually think, from time to time. I love Hall's skillset... but his brain needs much work.
Look you can kill Hall for any number of plays where he got beat (there are plenty of them), but I wish purple would stop bringing up the one play that was absolutely not his fault. As long as Romo got time to get the ball off that was going to be a complete pass. Hall had no way of stopping the play. If he had had perfect coverage (which he didn't) the result of the play would have been the same.
4&25 is on Haslett; Hall deserves none of the blame blame! Pick on any number of the plays where Hall actually got not the one he was on a no win situation.