Countertrey wrote:Yup... see you've allowed the hype to color your reality. The FACT is, the Denver defense kept the games in control last year... but, whether you like it or not, Tebow got scores that Campbell would NOT have. You can call it hype. I'll call it "it". With Campbell as their quarterback last year, they go nowhere. With Tebow, they got to the postseason, despite his lack of quarterback skills.
Your fact is correct. Your assertion that tebow got sores campbell would not have, is quite literally an impossible comment to support or prove wrong. To do so you'd need to LITERALLY put each in the other's situations and then run game condition tests to figure it out, and even then it might not actually be dispositive. So, congrats? This "IT" you attribute to Tebow currently has him doing the same thing Campbell is doing. Backing up another guy who it would seem has enough more of IT then either of them do.
Countertrey wrote:Finally, I have NO idea where you get the impression that I think Tebow is a quarterback... more coloring resulting from your preconceptions, I imagine. You don't have to be a quarterback to have it. (see London Fletcher).
Expansion of a point. Wasn't attributing the Tebow is a QB to you, but to the the hype that has clearly ensared you with regard to him. (P.S. That's me attributing the over Tebow flavored kool aid drinking to you). If you don't think he's a quarterback, great, we agree. I've no preconceptions about Tebow or you, all I have is observation of him and reading what you write.
We agree you don't have to be a qb to have it, we disagree as to whether Tebow does.