skinsfan#33 wrote:Eli is not just a very good QB any more, that dude is elite. With 2 mins to go in a big game I would rather have him than his brother.
Can you pass that over here? Sounds like you're smoking the good stuff.
skinsfan#33 wrote:Eli is not just a very good QB any more, that dude is elite. With 2 mins to go in a big game I would rather have him than his brother.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.
Deadskins wrote:skinsfan#33 wrote:Eli is not just a very good QB any more, that dude is elite. With 2 mins to go in a big game I would rather have him than his brother.
Can you pass that over here? Sounds like you're smoking the good stuff.
Deadskins wrote:skinsfan#33 wrote:Eli is not just a very good QB any more, that dude is elite. With 2 mins to go in a big game I would rather have him than his brother.
Can you pass that over here? Sounds like you're smoking the good stuff.
rskin72 wrote:Hello....first post in the Hogs web site..... I have been a fan of the Skins since around '72, and have held season tic's for past three seasons, some of the worst this franchise has experienced.
Personally, I have had an ear to ear grin on my face since I heard the word yesterday that we have traded up in the draft. With Peyton Manning out of the discussion, we needed to do what it took to secure one of these two QB's in the draft, and I am happy that we did. Did we give up too much? Well, time will tell, but I DO appreciate our management being proactive rather than relying on the same QB's as last season (remember, the ones that we could win with) or worse yet, bringing in Kyle Orton or yet another average QB. Please child, my eyes cannot bear to watch us struggle to score 14 points each game.
We have not really had a "franchise" QB since Jurgensen.....IMHO anyhow. None of the QB's that won SB's for us I would consider franchise , with the possible exception of Theismann. Gibbs made a living out of taking good to very good QB's and winning with them. But times have changed, and all you have to do is look at the teams who get into the playoffs year after year. The majority have stud QB's, not merely good QB's and certainly not average QB's.
We had a chance to trade up to get a potential stud QB, and our management did just that. And, by the way, we also have a huge amount of cap room to make some significant signings in free agency to plug holes that we may not be able to fill via the draft. I am not upset that we have rolled the dice with this trade.....and if it does not work out, then I will be more critical about the scouting aspect of our team vice the actual proactive decision that was made to bring a top prospect QB into FEDEX.
Even though we have had two losing seasons since Shanahan came to town, I just get the feeling that things are slowly starting to turn around, and this year we may take that big leap from bottom dweller to a playoff run......at least still be in contention into November.
Sorry to babble on, but hopefully time will prove the naysayers wrong and this will end up being one of the jewels of the Shanahan/Allen regime.
rskin72
rskin72 wrote:Hello....first post in the Hogs web site..... I have been a fan of the Skins since around '72, and have held season tic's for past three seasons, some of the worst this franchise has experienced.
Personally, I have had an ear to ear grin on my face since I heard the word yesterday that we have traded up in the draft. With Peyton Manning out of the discussion, we needed to do what it took to secure one of these two QB's in the draft, and I am happy that we did. Did we give up too much? Well, time will tell, but I DO appreciate our management being proactive rather than relying on the same QB's as last season (remember, the ones that we could win with) or worse yet, bringing in Kyle Orton or yet another average QB. Please child, my eyes cannot bear to watch us struggle to score 14 points each game.
We have not really had a "franchise" QB since Jurgensen.....IMHO anyhow. None of the QB's that won SB's for us I would consider franchise , with the possible exception of Theismann. Gibbs made a living out of taking good to very good QB's and winning with them. But times have changed, and all you have to do is look at the teams who get into the playoffs year after year. The majority have stud QB's, not merely good QB's and certainly not average QB's.
We had a chance to trade up to get a potential stud QB, and our management did just that. And, by the way, we also have a huge amount of cap room to make some significant signings in free agency to plug holes that we may not be able to fill via the draft. I am not upset that we have rolled the dice with this trade.....and if it does not work out, then I will be more critical about the scouting aspect of our team vice the actual proactive decision that was made to bring a top prospect QB into FEDEX.
Even though we have had two losing seasons since Shanahan came to town, I just get the feeling that things are slowly starting to turn around, and this year we may take that big leap from bottom dweller to a playoff run......at least still be in contention into November.
Sorry to babble on, but hopefully time will prove the naysayers wrong and this will end up being one of the jewels of the Shanahan/Allen regime.
rskin72
Obviously, you're an educated Redskin fan, as your remarks reveal a depth of team history, as well as good sound logic.
skinsfan#33 wrote:the poster wrote:
The way I look at it we gave up three 1st, two 2nds, two 3rds, a 4th, and a 5th for Shuler, JC, Brad Johnson, and McNabb. If we get 8-10 seasons out of RG3 at the level BJ played for us in 99 then our trade was a STEEL!
the poster wrote:skinsfan#33 wrote:the poster wrote:
The way I look at it we gave up three 1st, two 2nds, two 3rds, a 4th, and a 5th for Shuler, JC, Brad Johnson, and McNabb. If we get 8-10 seasons out of RG3 at the level BJ played for us in 99 then our trade was a STEEL!
all you're doing buddy is illustrating the failed history of the recent redskin era, mostly under Snyder. save your breath, everyone knows they make terrible organizational decisions. they just added to their long history, that's all.
I know he got a pretty good zip on the ball. He has a quick release. . . once I seen a coupla' throws, I was just like 'Yeah, he's that dude.'"
Obviously you're a kid, the Walker trade was for more. But riddle me this batman. Discuss trades for franchise QB's because the rest don't compare. Who got a better deal? How often are franchise QB's traded? Only under unique circumstances, like the Rams having a QB they picked with the #1 overall last year. The Colts had Peyton Manning and wouldn't give up drafting a franchise QB.
the poster wrote:skinsfan#33 wrote:the poster wrote:
The way I look at it we gave up three 1st, two 2nds, two 3rds, a 4th, and a 5th for Shuler, JC, Brad Johnson, and McNabb. If we get 8-10 seasons out of RG3 at the level BJ played for us in 99 then our trade was a STEEL!
all you're doing buddy is illustrating the failed history of the recent redskin era, mostly under Snyder. save your breath, everyone knows they make terrible organizational decisions. they just added to their long history, that's all.
Actually, most of that was under Charley Casserly. The two first for desmond, the first for heath, the first, second, and third for BJ were all under Charley. I had it wrong, it was 4 first.
the poster wrote:
Actually, most of that was under Charley Casserly. The two first for desmond, the first for heath, the first, second, and third for BJ were all under Charley. I had it wrong, it was 4 first.
so? are u struggling to make the point that they've been making stupid decisions long before Snyder got there? if that's what you want to argue, the dumb decisions in the 90s vs. the dumb decisions of the 2000s, you know what , you can do that on your own.
I'll just say they've made a boatload of draft and free agent mistakes in the past 10 years, more than any other team in the NFL , and thats the reason why no one outside of the cocoon on redskin fans thinks of the redskins as anything more than a perennial loser. if you don't like that stmt, I'm sorry but facts are facts. look at the scoreboard.
The point I was tring to make is we have spent first round picks in a much more foolish manner than w did this time. Desmond was a failed quest from the start; no WR is worth two first round picks. Heath had huge question marks. BJ was the best QB pay we had for decades, but unfortunately that was short lived.
[/quote]
I know he got a pretty good zip on the ball. He has a quick release. . . once I seen a coupla' throws, I was just like 'Yeah, he's that dude.'"
SkinsJock wrote:Since the 90's there have been significant changes in both the NFL and with the Washington Redskins
The Redskins have basically had 3 different FO's managing the franchise and under very different scenarios
Snyder bought the franchise in 1999 and mis-managed it for 20 years - that is obvious to everybody
agreed. snyder not 20 years plus yet, but i got it..The ONLY way that Mike Shanahan agreed to come to the Redskins and be both HC and help Bruce Allen manage the franchise was if Dan Snyder agreed to turn over ALL the player and team related control to this FO
The Redskins roster of 2009 has been completely changed and while the records of 6-10 and 5-11 are what they are, the Redskins are in a lot better shape than the record would indicate
ok. fair enough point. and i would agree on some point to it, but unfortunately for the argument (and even I would agree it sucks for the timing of it)...but the past 24 hours have changed things.
They cleaned out some old contracts, got rid of some players and went from being one of the oldest teams to (I think) one of the younger ones. so...that's what you want to do when you're rebuilding.
of course, a big component to transitioning to a younger roster is to acquire large cap space in the future so that a new coach like you point out can shape the roster with the guys he wants.
but now.....theyve had that cap space stripped from them. none of us know the gritty details to argue if its valid or not, all that matters for this argument is that it is indeed taken away from them.even before the Redskins added RG3 - there are many that think they could & should contend for a playoff spot in 2012
I dont think so. Every fan base has a general opinion of another fan base, right? For example, I live 10 minutes from Eagles stadium, I happen to hate the Eagles. And what is the reputation of thier fanbase? Aholes, degenerates.
What's the general opinion of Raiders fans, for example? Same thing. Not really hard core football fans, too.
You know what other people say about Redskin fans? Let me let you in on it. Redskin fans general characteristics as observed by outsiders is that they frequently overrate the talent on their team.
One can probably say that about every teams' fans. But in Washington it really stands out.
The players that you think are really good....I probably think are mediocre at best.
And your team REALLY needs to start winning games already to start backing you guys up on this stuff. I can find the same posts every past offseason.The imposter is obviously so bothered by the current FO of the Redskins that she needs to make out like the Redskins are still "the same old Redskins"
the Redskins are going to surprise a lot of fans in the NFL this season
emoses14 wrote:the poster wrote:
No.
wow. compelling.
Oh and one more thing:
you haven't gotten to the first thing yet.
Speaking of scoreboards, what is the cowboys' playoff record
the poster wrote:emoses14 wrote:the poster wrote:
No.
wow. compelling.
Oh and one more thing:
you haven't gotten to the first thing yet.
Speaking of scoreboards, what is the cowboys' playoff record
pfft...I dont know and I dont care. Im not a fan of any team you might think I am. In fact, I would say that the last team you could think of is who I have a rooting interest for.
and btw your argument skills are the worst amongst everyone here. your fellow skins fans should do that talking for you.
I know he got a pretty good zip on the ball. He has a quick release. . . once I seen a coupla' throws, I was just like 'Yeah, he's that dude.'"
StorminMormon86 wrote:markshark84 wrote:Sorry was out of the country and just learning of what we gave up. I have only one reaction:
![]()
Sorry, but 3 firsts is ridiculous.
Really? You're not the least bit excited to see what this kid turns out to be?