Must Read Shanahan interview

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Post Reply
User avatar
riggofan
HereComesTheDiesel
HereComesTheDiesel
Posts: 9460
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:29 pm
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Must Read Shanahan interview

Post by riggofan »

Really so much good stuff in here. Its fun to read this at the end of the season where Shanahan can be a little more honest about things. I think he answers a lot of criticisms here that you read regularly on this website too like the 49ers turned it around in a year why couldn't we.

Good reading whether you buy all of it or not:

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/ ... -contender
ASHBURN, Va. -- This is the 16th year in a row in which at least five teams will make the NFL playoffs that didn't make it the year before. That's enough of a trend to make you think it'll happen again next year. And head coach Mike Shanahan says he believes his Washington Redskins are in a position to be one of next year's five.

"Yeah, I think we are," Shanahan told me in an interview Friday in his office at the Redskins' training facility. "We've got to be a little lucky with injuries, because we don't have depth. But we'll have a lot more depth next year than we did this year. And I think we had a chance this year if we'd stayed healthy."

Shanahan gave me a lot of time Friday and addressed a wide variety of topics. I was able to incorporate into the interview several of the questions you guys sent me in the mailbag, and my hope is to fill you in on the Shanahan interview as completely as possible in several different posts over the coming days. So here are a couple of your questions and what Shanahan had to say in response:

Kent Senter of Falls Church, Va., wanted to know why Shanahan has been preaching that the Redskins' rebuilding project must take time while a coach like Jim Harbaugh can come in and turn the San Francisco 49ers around in one year.

[+] EnlargeMike Shanahan
Robert Mayer/US PresswireMike Shanahan intends to stick with the plan of building the Redskins through the draft.
Mike Shanahan: We had dealt a lot through free agency and not the draft. San Francisco did a great job through the draft, they did a great job with their organization. If you take a look at the players that they have playing for them over the last three or four years, take a look at their draft choices and the free agents that they did acquire, they had some pretty good picks. Here, they'd traded away a lot of the draft choices. I think everybody knows that -- the history of the Redskins and draft choices. But we talked about, when I came here, that with the salary cap you've got to build through the draft. You just can't keep on signing high-priced free agents, because there's no way you can develop the depth. And so we had to change philosophies and we've done that and hopefully it pays dividends.

Greg Martin of Freehold, N.J., says he's on board with Shanahan's change of philosophy and believes it has paid dividends. Greg wanted to know if this year's Redskins draft strategy would be similar to last year's, when Washington traded down and amassed more picks, or if they'd consider trading "multiple current or future picks for one player, QB or otherwise."

MS: You just never know. If anybody says they know the draft ... It takes one person before you, one person after you... You never know what somebody wants to get a deal done. I don't know [if I can trade up] because I really don't know what the value is. I mean, are you looking at three No. 1s? Three No. 2s? And who's the guy? Is it the first pick? Is it the second or third? How bad does that team want to move out of there? You just don't know.

I followed up with a question about the reports and speculation that it could take three No. 1 picks to trade up to the No. 1 spot and take Stanford quarterback Andrew Luck and asked if he considered that realistic or sensible. He responded with a comparison to the 2002 deal in which the Oakland Raiders got two first-round picks, two second-round picks and cash from the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in exchange for head coach Jon Gruden.

MS: I told Jon, 'No offense, but you're not worth that much! And don't go to the place where they're giving up the two No. 1s for you.' I mean, it just handcuffs you.

Finally, I asked if he thought his team was close enough to contending that he could afford to give away a big trove of draft picks for one player he really wanted.

MS: No. In fact that's why, when we went from 10 to 16 [in last year's draft] and we were able to get that extra second-rounder from Jacksonville, we were able to parlay that where we got [Leonard] Hankerson, we got [Roy] Helu and we got [DeJon] Gomes. So by going from 10 to 16, not only did we get Jarvis Jenkins, but we were able to get those three players. And those are three starters for us.

Much more to come, as I said, in the coming days. But hopefully this is good stuff for you guys to chew on for a bit. Thanks for your help with the interview.
Who knows for sure, but I think fans hoping to trade up for Luck this April are going to be disappointed. Just a gut feeling. I keep seeing stuff from Shanny that seems to be laying the case for why they can't afford to do it.
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

Who really knows but my gut and what they've done here last year and Shanny's past tells me he's not going to overpay for any player. I think that he feels he has the guys who can develop any player. My opinion is that is why they were so high on Beck. Their ego said that they can make him into a player but I think really quickly (3 games) they realized that he just didn't have the skill set to be a starting QB.
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Post by Irn-Bru »

The one-year turnaround examples are often not good ones. Tampa Bay was everyone's offseason favorite because they had a one-year turnaround, a young exciting coach, and the youngest roster in the league. Now look at them: nine in a row lost, tons of discipline/maturity problems (who would have thought?), coach about to be fired, and no clear direction for the franchise.

What's important is not whether you are on pace to win 11 games this year; what's important is whether there is a leader with a good plan and clear vision who is making things happen in a positive direction. The victories are inevitable at that point, though it might take 2, 3, or 4 years to really start seeing them. A one-year turnaround isn't necessarily a good thing for the long-term future of a franchise.
Redskin in Canada
~~~~~~
~~~~~~
Posts: 10323
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 9:59 am
Location: Canada

Post by Redskin in Canada »

Irn-Bru wrote:The one-year turnaround examples are often not good ones. Tampa Bay was everyone's offseason favorite because they had a one-year turnaround, a young exciting coach, and the youngest roster in the league. Now look at them: nine in a row lost, tons of discipline/maturity problems (who would have thought?), coach about to be fired, and no clear direction for the franchise.

What's important is not whether you are on pace to win 11 games this year; what's important is whether there is a leader with a good plan and clear vision who is making things happen in a positive direction. The victories are inevitable at that point, though it might take 2, 3, or 4 years to really start seeing them. A one-year turnaround isn't necessarily a good thing for the long-term future of a franchise.
It is called VISION.

A person leading a government in those circumstances would be called:

A Statesman.

Unfortunately, they are hard to come by. :cry:
Daniel Snyder has defined incompetence, failure and greed to true Washington Redskins fans for over a decade and a half. Stay away from football operations !!!
Jeremy81
Hog
Posts: 814
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 11:55 am

Post by Jeremy81 »

Good article...this is the mindset I've wanted for years. So tired of over paying for free agents. I liked the trade down last year, and I wouldn't mind if they did that again this year. And not just that, but choosing those picks wisely...time will tell, but I like what I've seen from kerrigan and helu and gomes. I'm excited to see what a healthy hankerson and jenkins can do. I know it was two years ago, still a shanahan draft, but perry riley has shown some flashes for a late draft pick.

I just like the direction and the mindset a lot more now than I did when cerrato was running the show
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Post by Irn-Bru »

Jeremy81 wrote:Good article...this is the mindset I've wanted for years. So tired of over paying for free agents. I liked the trade down last year, and I wouldn't mind if they did that again this year. And not just that, but choosing those picks wisely...time will tell, but I like what I've seen from kerrigan and helu and gomes. I'm excited to see what a healthy hankerson and jenkins can do. I know it was two years ago, still a shanahan draft, but perry riley has shown some flashes for a late draft pick.

I just like the direction and the mindset a lot more now than I did when cerrato was running the show
It makes all the difference, doesn't it? I am loving our change of pace, even if a 5 or 6 win season is still frustrating.
mastdark81
Hog
Posts: 916
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 7:21 pm

Post by mastdark81 »

I think like in the past Shanahan is not going to drop hints on what he will do in the draft even though he is hinting on not trading up...this is just smoke and mirrors.
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

Shanahan is playing a game. It's the same game that is played every year. It's full of feignts... and "slips of the tongue"... half-truths... lies... and, yes, smoke and mirrors. Last year, he played it particularly well. I suspect he will play it equally well come April.

You can be sure of only one thing. You won't know what he does... until he does it.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
User avatar
Red_One43
Hog
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Red_One43 »

Countertrey wrote:Shanahan is playing a game. It's the same game that is played every year. It's full of feignts... and "slips of the tongue"... half-truths... lies... and, yes, smoke and mirrors. Last year, he played it particularly well. I suspect he will play it equally well come April.

You can be sure of only one thing. You won't know what he does... until he does it.
+1

Rich Tandler has been reading THN Message Boards: :)
Of course, if Shanahan had flatly ruled it out or if he said that he has already been in contact with the Colts and Rams to start trade talks there would be no reason to believe him. He is getting out the message that he wants to get out and that involves a lot of smoke and mirrors.
We won’t know whether or not he would pull off a big deal until either he does it or the draft is over.
http://www.realredskins.com/rich-tandle ... -a-qb.html
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

Rich and I have been tweeting a TON lately!!!
Post Reply