Laron Landry active for Monday night

ATX_Skins · Post by **ATX_Skins** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:02 am

Just heard it on the radio, and yes, I listen to 106.7 in Texas all morning...

He may have tweeted it if anyone follows and can confirm.

44diesel · Post by **44diesel** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:11 am

Here's a couple of links:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/dc- ... _blog.html

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/4178/laron-landry

Not really a confirmation, but he at least has the mindset that he's ready to go. Glad we've got the Monday Night game this week. Can't wait to see what this defense can do when Dirty30 is back in the lineup.

langleyparkjoe · Post by **langleyparkjoe** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:15 am

I'm like "eh" on him coming back now actually. I know he's a better safety than Reed but if he's not 100%, I don't want him back right now.
Yea its early but if we can keep doing what we're doing without him and give him a chance to get even healthier than I'm all in. However that would mean our DL and LBs will have to keep playing at a high volume as well.

44diesel · Post by **44diesel** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:22 am

langleyparkjoe wrote:I'm like "eh" on him coming back now actually. I know he's a better safety than Reed but if he's not 100%, I don't want him back right now.
Yea its early but if we can keep doing what we're doing without him and give him a chance to get even healthier than I'm all in. However that would mean our DL and LBs will have to keep playing at a high volume as well.

I agree with you LPJ, that it's far more important for him to be 100% before he returns. No sense in rushing back and running the risk of being out the rest of the season. Just eager to see what'll happen once he's back.

oneman56 · Post by **oneman56** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:34 am

I also agree, see Arian Foster for an example. I want LL available for the long haul and I hope that he's only cleared if he's truly ready.

mastdark81 · Post by **mastdark81** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:24 pm

44diesel wrote:
langleyparkjoe wrote:I'm like "eh" on him coming back now actually. I know he's a better safety than Reed but if he's not 100%, I don't want him back right now.
Yea its early but if we can keep doing what we're doing without him and give him a chance to get even healthier than I'm all in. However that would mean our DL and LBs will have to keep playing at a high volume as well.

I agree with you LPJ, that it's far more important for him to be 100% before he returns. No sense in rushing back and running the risk of being out the rest of the season. Just eager to see what'll happen once he's back.

I say play him. We need him. Its not like he's coming back from knee surgery where he need his ligaments to completely heal.

Smithian · Post by **Smithian** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:36 pm

Unleash the Fury, LaRon

frankcal20 · Post by **frankcal20** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:19 pm

I don't think that they are fearful of any significance of re injury and I'm sure he'll be closely monitored in the game. Keep in mind that he has 10 days of practice until the game so they'll be watching him then too.

The most important thing here is that if we win, we'll be 2-0 in the division with a win vs Dallas and NYG's. That's HUGE come postseason record analysis. I don't think we'll win the division but if we're in 2nd, most likely we're a wild card team given recent history.

The Hogster · Post by **The Hogster** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:27 pm

I wouldn't be as concerned if Reed wasn't his backup. He's just bad. Like a huge liability bad. Like throw at him and win bad.

redskinz4ever · Post by **redskinz4ever** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:45 pm

just

he is 100% healthy and did not come back to soon

BossHog · Post by **BossHog** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:51 pm

mastdark81 wrote:
44diesel wrote:
langleyparkjoe wrote:I'm like "eh" on him coming back now actually. I know he's a better safety than Reed but if he's not 100%, I don't want him back right now.
Yea its early but if we can keep doing what we're doing without him and give him a chance to get even healthier than I'm all in. However that would mean our DL and LBs will have to keep playing at a high volume as well.

I agree with you LPJ, that it's far more important for him to be 100% before he returns. No sense in rushing back and running the risk of being out the rest of the season. Just eager to see what'll happen once he's back.

I say play him. We need him. Its not like he's coming back from knee surgery where he need his ligaments to completely heal.

That's all well and good but remember that this started as an achilles injury. The Hammy injury CAME FROM COMING BACK TOO EARLY.

And after the stuff that LL said about the training staff - IMO, they definitely aren't going to err anywhere but on the side of caution.

langleyparkjoe · Post by **langleyparkjoe** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:52 pm

All good points indeed!! Not gonna lie, I'm really boosted to see him knock Romo out for the year since San Fran started but didn't finish him off.

redskinz4ever · Post by **redskinz4ever** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:06 pm

The Hogster wrote:I wouldn't be as concerned if Reed wasn't his backup. He's just bad. Like a huge liability bad. Like throw at him and win bad.

true and funny but not laughing

SkinsHead56 · Post by **SkinsHead56** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:19 pm

langleyparkjoe wrote:All good points indeed!! Not gonna lie, I'm really boosted to see him knock Romo out for the year since San Fran started but didn't finish him off.

Carlos still helping out the Skins with big hits on Witten & Romo

ATX_Skins · Post by **ATX_Skins** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:20 pm

redskinz4ever wrote:
The Hogster wrote:I wouldn't be as concerned if Reed wasn't his backup. He's just bad. Like a huge liability bad. Like throw at him and win bad.
true and funny but not laughing

As Charles Barkley would say:

"Reed Doughty is just turrible"

redskinz4ever · Post by **redskinz4ever** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:21 pm

ATX_Skins wrote:
redskinz4ever wrote:
The Hogster wrote:I wouldn't be as concerned if Reed wasn't his backup. He's just bad. Like a huge liability bad. Like throw at him and win bad.
true and funny but not laughing

As Charles Barkley would say:

"Reed Doughty is just turrible"

ok now im laughing ROTFALMAO

The Hogster · Post by **The Hogster** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:30 pm

redskinz4ever wrote:
ATX_Skins wrote:
redskinz4ever wrote:
The Hogster wrote:I wouldn't be as concerned if Reed wasn't his backup. He's just bad. Like a huge liability bad. Like throw at him and win bad.
true and funny but not laughing

As Charles Barkley would say:

"Reed Doughty is just turrible"
ok now im laughing

Fill in the Blank

Reed Doughty is ____________ bad.

Reed Doughty is Starship "We Built This City" bad.

Reed Doughty is Milli Vanilli bad.

Reed Doughty is Vanilla Ice bad.

Reed Doughty is old school Tampa Bay Bucs creamsicle uniform bad.

SkinsHead56 · Post by **SkinsHead56** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:38 pm

..............Rosie O'Donnel in short shorts bad.

..................Beer farts bad.

ATX_Skins · Post by **ATX_Skins** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:45 pm

Reed Doughty is Lindsay Lohan bad.

ATX_Skins · Post by **ATX_Skins** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:45 pm

...work on Sunday bad

The Hogster · Post by **The Hogster** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:48 pm

.....Shamwow commercial bad

HarleyHog · Post by **HarleyHog** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:54 pm

redskinz4ever wrote:
The Hogster wrote:I wouldn't be as concerned if Reed wasn't his backup. He's just bad. Like a huge liability bad. Like throw at him and win bad.
true and funny but not laughing

Clearly NOT true!
They exploited him sure, but we WON.
He is not bad, he plays very hard, and usually smart. He lacks the physical talent to be real good, but his gaffes are still the exception not the rule. I am eager to get LL back out there, especially for The pieboys, but we can still win this one without him if prudence says wait.

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:54 pm

Reed Doughty is... playing for the Redskins while you ain't bad...

just sayin... :wink:

The Hogster · Post by **The Hogster** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:55 pm

Countertrey wrote:Playing for the Redskins while you ain't bad...

just sayin...

For now

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:57 pm

How about... played and playing for the Redskins while you ain't, never did, and never will... bad.

still just sayin...

and, it's always... "for now"... just some "for nows" are longer than others... though, a career that goes longer than 3 years in the NFL is the exception.

How long has Reed played?

Yeah... he's bad.