Internet Troll Jailed

Wanna talk about politics, your favorite hockey team... vegetarian recipes?
Post Reply
User avatar
cvillehog
Hog
Posts: 5220
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 3:03 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Internet Troll Jailed

Post by cvillehog »

Don't go online if you can't do the time?

http://thefutureisentertaining.com/man- ... ll-jailed/

Man Becomes First Internet Troll to be Jailed

A man who wrote hurtful messages on social networking sites and specifically targeted the families and memorial pages of deceased teenagers has been jailed for his trolling behaviour.

Sean Duffy, a 25 year-old from the UK, has been jailed for 18 weeks for his actions, making him the first person to face time in prison for his offensive words online.

Duffy sent a string of messages directly to some of the teenagers’ families, wrote hurtful messages on memorial pages their friends had set up and also created his own YouTube and Facebook accounts in an attempt to mock their tragic deaths.

The court ruled that once Duffy is released after his 18 week sentence he will not able to access any kind of social networking site, including Facebook, Twitter, Myspace and Bebo ever again. It’s not yet been made clear how this ban will be enforced, but it’ll be interesting to see whether the social networking platforms themselves will be asked to help and what their response will be. Only last month did we discuss the Home Office’s decision to NOT restrict specific individuals from online networks in the future, and even though this is a different case, it’s still an interesting development given the public uproar over the prospect of a ban a few weeks ago.

As this is the first case of its kind, it raises some interesting questions about the correct punishment for online trolls. Granted there are those who see Duffy’s case as being particularly harsh, especially the fact he’s banned from social networks for what seems to be the rest of his life. However, far too many people seem to get away with writing all kinds of hurtful, abusive things online because they feel they have complete anonymity, but now Duffy’s sentence shows that won’t always be the case.
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Re: Internet Troll Jailed

Post by Deadskins »

cvillehog wrote:Don't go online if you can't do the time?

http://thefutureisentertaining.com/man- ... ll-jailed/

Man Becomes First Internet Troll to be Jailed

A man who wrote hurtful messages on social networking sites and specifically targeted the families and memorial pages of deceased teenagers has been jailed for his trolling behaviour.

Sean Duffy, a 25 year-old from the UK, has been jailed for 18 weeks for his actions, making him the first person to face time in prison for his offensive words online.

Duffy sent a string of messages directly to some of the teenagers’ families, wrote hurtful messages on memorial pages their friends had set up and also created his own YouTube and Facebook accounts in an attempt to mock their tragic deaths.

The court ruled that once Duffy is released after his 18 week sentence he will not able to access any kind of social networking site, including Facebook, Twitter, Myspace and Bebo ever again. It’s not yet been made clear how this ban will be enforced, but it’ll be interesting to see whether the social networking platforms themselves will be asked to help and what their response will be. Only last month did we discuss the Home Office’s decision to NOT restrict specific individuals from online networks in the future, and even though this is a different case, it’s still an interesting development given the public uproar over the prospect of a ban a few weeks ago.

As this is the first case of its kind, it raises some interesting questions about the correct punishment for online trolls. Granted there are those who see Duffy’s case as being particularly harsh, especially the fact he’s banned from social networks for what seems to be the rest of his life. However, far too many people seem to get away with writing all kinds of hurtful, abusive things online because they feel they have complete anonymity, but now Duffy’s sentence shows that won’t always be the case.

I can't see this as a criminal offense. Might be room for a civil case, though.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

In most other countries, there is no protected speech in the way it exists here. That's just how it is... and it's one of the things that makes the United States very different from any country in Europe.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

Does this mean we can be tried in England for giving UKSkinsFan the business in smack? :shock:
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
Cappster
cappster
cappster
Posts: 3014
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:25 am
Location: Humanist, at your service.

Post by Cappster »

at first I thought this thread was aimed at RR56 haha
Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 280x, FTW!

Hog Bowl II Champion (2010)
User avatar
cvillehog
Hog
Posts: 5220
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 3:03 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Post by cvillehog »

Cappster wrote:at first I thought this thread was aimed at RR56 haha


In a way it was. :)
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

Deadskins wrote:Does this mean we can be tried in England for giving UKSkinsFan the business in smack? :shock:


No, it means he can be tried for giving us the business in smack. I'm hiring a barrister...
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
User avatar
BigRedskinDaddy
Hog
Posts: 579
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:12 am
Location: Hemet CA

Post by BigRedskinDaddy »

KazooSkinsFan wrote:No, it means he can be tried for giving us the business in smack. I'm hiring a barrister...


A barrister? Why would you need that thing that keeps you from falling down the stairs? :wink:
SB 17 - 22 - 26 - ??
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

I prefer the term "barristard"...
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
langleyparkjoe
**LPJ**
**LPJ**
Posts: 6714
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
Contact:

Post by langleyparkjoe »

BigRedskinDaddy wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:No, it means he can be tried for giving us the business in smack. I'm hiring a barrister...


A barrister? Why would you need that thing that keeps you from falling down the stairs? :wink:


LAUGHING
MY
TAIL
OFF
!!!!!!
Hog Bowl Champions
'09 & '17 langleyparkjoe, '10 Cappster, '11 & '13 DarthMonk,
'12 Deadskins, '14 PickSixerTWSS, '15 APEX PREDATOR, '16 vwoodzpusha
Post Reply