Grossman to re-sign and to BATTLE!

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
User avatar
Red_One43
Hog
Posts: 4609
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Red_One43 »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
Red_One43 wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote: That depends on how right (or wrong) the team was in their evaluation of Gabbert. If he turns out to be franchise quality qb, it will have been a big mistake by the front office to pass on him.
That is a good point, but Kerrigan also has to figure into the equation. If he turns ou to be a stud, then that cancels out Gabbert. Then you also have to figure in, if we get Luck, Barkley or Landry next year.
Not really. A stud linebacker in no way cancels out a stub qb. However, this is all pure conjecture.
You are right indeed - not well put by myself. I attempted to say that if we are happy with our pick of Kerrigan, who was one of many needs, and though Gabbert may become a star, he was not the right fit for us and would not haved starred for us. When we pick one of the stud QBs next year, all will work out in our favor. How's that for conjecture of the pure kind with a tough of dream added to it. :)
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

1niksder wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:Not really. A stud linebacker in no way cancels out a stub qb. However, this is all pure conjecture.
We were right to pass on Gabbert
Garrard was carted of the field today... we should have charged them more
Too bad you have to make trades ex-ante and not ex-post.

I'd still think they aren't going to start Gabbert though, it'd be tossing the season and they aren't the Lions.
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
Post Reply