fleetus wrote:In general, I think the media is a bunch of college grad, journalism majors, who don't really "know" much of anything. They read the "cliff notes" on a given subject and then write about it. We the fans give the media too much credit. They typically "pigeon-hole" people and that's it. It will take a miracle for a reporter to ever see Dan Snyder as anything but an over-controlling owner, no matter what he does. Same thing with Brunell. They've decided because he makes more money so he will start. That's it, that's as far as they can see. The Len Pasquarelli's and Vic Carucci's of the world aren't intelligent or open-minded enough to really delve into the facts and learn.
Whoa, whoa, whoa !! Where is all this coming from ? When I read the article, I found myself in agreement. Carucci didn't say that the salary would be a consideration, or that Brunell was the unqualified starter. All he said was "Brunell should end up with the starting job."
I think we all need to come to grips with the very real possibility that this may well be the case. Carucci was, in my opinion, predicting the winner of the camp battle. Why not Brunell ? I think he's got an awesome shot at unseating young Patches for the job. Do I think he has the longevity yet to retain the job ? Nope. Still, he could be the starter, and there will be a competition.
Carucci did not slap us or Ramsey around in the article, and this separates him from Pasquarelli by miles, man. Pasquarelli comes after this team with a vigorous hatred. Carucci simply made a prediction.
Now take that noose off his neck, boys. That's right. Let him down, reeeaaallll slow-like. He ain't done nothing to you; no need to hang 'im.
"Sit back and watch the Redskins.
SOMETHING MAGICAL IS ABOUT TO BEGIN!"
JPFair- A fan's fan. RIP, brother