Jay Cutler

The Hogster · Post by **The Hogster** » Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:46 am

The leather jacket sealed his fate. :shock:

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:08 am

The Hogster wrote:The leather jacket sealed his fate.

He's doing his best Fonzi impression.

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:06 pm

The Hogster wrote:The leather jacket sealed his fate.

Humph...I thought it was the fact that he apparently shares a plastic surgeon with Nancy Pelosi...

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:09 pm

Countertrey wrote:
The Hogster wrote:The leather jacket sealed his fate.

Humph...I thought it was the fact that he apparently shares a plastic surgeon with Nancy Pelosi...

If I was Jerry I'd get a refund - the face lift made them look even worse than before - altho with Pelosi, who can look without gagging :puke:

KazooSkinsFan · Post by **KazooSkinsFan** » Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:50 pm

1niksder wrote:
1niksder wrote:

My bad... you guys wanted a link

Wow, thanks Bears! I don't think he's worth that even if he didn't have a bad attitude. With a good attitude he'd be a good quarterback, not a great one. But I disagree the Bears offer was better because the two #1's were from us. Don't get me wrong, I'm optimistic, I always am. But going by history of us under Snyder...

KazooSkinsFan · Post by **KazooSkinsFan** » Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:52 pm

DarthMonk wrote:
1niksder wrote:
1niksder wrote:

My bad... you guys wanted a link

SCHWEET! Rhymes with tweet!

DarthMonk

My favorite part was having the link....

KazooSkinsFan · Post by **KazooSkinsFan** » Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:55 pm

DarthMonk wrote:A clear reversal just occured. Hogster did not mock giving up a lot for Cutler. He mocked those who said giving up that much for Cutler was wise while those same people said we gave up too much for McNabb. I can see why it happened though. Hogter mocks sarcastically which can be mistaken for seriousness in his own position. But right before the sarcasm he calls Cutler a douche and right after he writes . Pretty clear.

Darthmonk

The incredible order of magnitude difference between two #1's and two #3's for one #2 and one #3 or #4 makes any comparison between those situations just silly to begin with whatever point he was making

KazooSkinsFan · Post by **KazooSkinsFan** » Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:04 pm

The Hogster wrote:Thanks Kazoo. May this thread serve as a monument to How Not To Use The Internet & Make a Jack Of Yourself.

I'm still in disbelief they took the Bears offer over ours considering the record of success of the Danster. Thank you Bears for bailing him out of that stupid offer.

BTW, did you hear about the terrorists who hijacked the plane of lawyers? They threatened to release one every hour until their demands were met.

But actually lawyers do serve one purpose. If it weren't for lawyers the only sleazy, crap eating, filth infested vermin we'd have would be rats, and that would be a tragedy...

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:28 am

KazooSkinsFan wrote:
1niksder wrote:
1niksder wrote:

My bad... you guys wanted a link

Wow, thanks Bears! I don't think he's worth that even if he didn't have a bad attitude. With a good attitude he'd be a good quarterback, not a great one. But I disagree the Bears offer was better because the two #1's were from us. Don't get me wrong, I'm optimistic, I always am. But going by history of us under Snyder...

Yeah, but it was all that and JC too, and Orton from Da Bears. And they still took Da Bears offer. :shock:

The Hogster · Post by **The Hogster** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:39 pm

Kazzoo wrote:
I'm still in disbelief they took the Bears offer over ours considering the record of success of the Danster.

It's really not rocket science. They needed a starting caliber Quarterback to replace the starting caliber Quarterback that they traded away.

BTW, did you hear about the terrorists who hijacked the plane of lawyers? They threatened to release one every hour until their demands were met.

Actually, I did hear that one. I heard you say it in another thread in which I embarrassed you in a similar manner as was done in this one. :lol:

As you say "if you can't dazzle them with brilliance" there's always a lawyer joke. =D>

But actually lawyers do serve one purpose. If it weren't for lawyers the only sleazy, crap eating, filth infested vermin we'd have would be rats, and that would be a tragedy..

Stay classy Kazoo.

KazooSkinsFan · Post by **KazooSkinsFan** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 2:28 pm

The Hogster wrote:I heard you say it in another thread in which I embarrassed you in a similar manner as was done in this one.

The need to continually state one's prowess is not driven by personal security. The need to feel it needs to be repeatedly stated shows that even to the claimer it's not obvious...

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:04 pm

KazooSkinsFan wrote:
The Hogster wrote:I heard you say it in another thread in which I embarrassed you in a similar manner as was done in this one.

The need to continually state one's prowess is not driven by personal security. The need to feel it needs to be repeatedly stated shows that even to the claimer it's not obvious...

It's pretty obvious in this case... They DID offer what was said they offered... Two 2s and two 3s ARE more than a two and a 3 or 4... The most obvious of it all is TWO LONGTIME BOARD MEMBERS continue to ATTACK THE POSTER instead of the post.

The Hogster · Post by **The Hogster** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:00 pm

It's pretty obvious in this case... They DID offer what was said they offered... Two 2s and two 3s ARE more than a two and a 3 or 4... The most obvious of it all is TWO LONGTIME BOARD MEMBERS continue to ATTACK THE POSTER instead of the post.

I apologize for my comments which violated the rules. Dealing with this particular poster has been known to cause several adverse side effects. I will avoid further contact.

The Hogster · Post by **The Hogster** » Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:59 am

1niksder wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
The Hogster wrote:I heard you say it in another thread in which I embarrassed you in a similar manner as was done in this one.

The need to continually state one's prowess is not driven by personal security. The need to feel it needs to be repeatedly stated shows that even to the claimer it's not obvious...
It's pretty obvious in this case... They DID offer what was said they offered... Two 2s and two 3s ARE more than a two and a 3 or 4... The most obvious of it all is TWO LONGTIME BOARD MEMBERS continue to ATTACK THE POSTER instead of the post.

BUMPED Per Kazoo's request.

Enjoy your fail Kazoo.

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:45 pm

Seriously????

KazooSkinsFan · Post by **KazooSkinsFan** » Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:25 pm

The Hogster wrote:
1niksder wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
The Hogster wrote:I heard you say it in another thread in which I embarrassed you in a similar manner as was done in this one.

The need to continually state one's prowess is not driven by personal security. The need to feel it needs to be repeatedly stated shows that even to the claimer it's not obvious...
It's pretty obvious in this case... They DID offer what was said they offered... Two 2s and two 3s ARE more than a two and a 3 or 4... The most obvious of it all is TWO LONGTIME BOARD MEMBERS continue to ATTACK THE POSTER instead of the post.

BUMPED Per Kazoo's request.

Enjoy your fail Kazoo.

Set up...like a bowling pin...knocked down...gets to wearing thin...

The fail is you, my man. Here is the statement you made.

The Hogster wrote:In 2008, the Redskins under the direction of Vinny Cerrato OFFERED 2 FIRST ROUND Picks AND TWO THIRD ROUND PICKS for Jay Cutler

I said BS to this. You never supported the two third round picks at all. You also never supported there was an "offer" of two first round picks, only reports in the media we were "willing" to part with two first round picks.

You declared victory. That you declared victory is the only part of the story you remember right. When you can prove your claim, let me know. You haven't so far.

The Hogster · Post by **The Hogster** » Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:42 pm

1niksder wrote:
1niksder wrote:

My bad... you guys wanted a link

Read

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Fri Mar 09, 2012 3:06 pm

KazooSkinsFan wrote:Set up...like a bowling pin...knocked down...gets to wearing thin...

Whoa, whoa, whoa there Kazoo. A Dead reference? You just blew my mind. :lol:

KazooSkinsFan · Post by **KazooSkinsFan** » Fri Mar 09, 2012 3:30 pm

The Hogster wrote:
1niksder wrote:
1niksder wrote:

My bad... you guys wanted a link

Read

The quotes not in that link. I find sheftner annoying as snot, but that doesn't make him wrong. So OK, Cerrato is that dumb. I'm glad that trade didn't happen.

And thanks for the compliment. Not only do you equate my just saying "Cerrato isn't that stupid" with disagreements of knowledge with other posters, but you listed me above them. When all you got me on is Cerrato IS that stupid.

Wow, I'm #1 with a bullet. I only enjoy that because I bother you so much.