Mike and Mike say 10-6 for the Skins

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Post Reply
spudstr04
spudstr04
spudstr04
Posts: 4116
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:13 am
Location: NC

Mike and Mike say 10-6 for the Skins

Post by spudstr04 »

http://espn.go.com/espnradio/player?rd=1#/podcenter/?id=5447359&autoplay=1&callsign=ESPNRADIO

They say that the better running game in Washington will benefit D-Nabb and that Clinton Portis will have a huge year. Listen to the radio broadcast and let me know what you think. I think 10-6 is a good guess, but I think we know as Redskins fans, that nothing would surprise us, 4-12 to 11-5 is possible with this team.
#21 = Forever in our hearts
User avatar
SnyderSucks
Hog
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:56 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: Mike and Mike say 10-6 for the Skins

Post by SnyderSucks »

spudstr04 wrote:http://espn.go.com/espnradio/player?rd=1#/podcenter/?id=5447359&autoplay=1&callsign=ESPNRADIO

They say that the better running game in Washington will benefit D-Nabb and that Clinton Portis will have a huge year. Listen to the radio broadcast and let me know what you think. I think 10-6 is a good guess, but I think we know as Redskins fans, that nothing would surprise us, 4-12 to 11-5 is possible with this team.


I had forgotten high a percentage philly was passing. They threw around 60% of plays. That belies all the chatter out of philly about McNabb not being good enough. Why would the genius coach call that many pass plays if McNabb is so bad? I agree that a better running game will improve McNabbs performance.
With the Cardinals reaching the Super Bowl, is Dan Snyder officially the worst owner in the league?
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Re: Mike and Mike say 10-6 for the Skins

Post by Deadskins »

SnyderSucks wrote:
spudstr04 wrote:http://espn.go.com/espnradio/player?rd=1#/podcenter/?id=5447359&autoplay=1&callsign=ESPNRADIO

They say that the better running game in Washington will benefit D-Nabb and that Clinton Portis will have a huge year. Listen to the radio broadcast and let me know what you think. I think 10-6 is a good guess, but I think we know as Redskins fans, that nothing would surprise us, 4-12 to 11-5 is possible with this team.


I had forgotten high a percentage philly was passing. They threw around 60% of plays. That belies all the chatter out of philly about McNabb not being good enough. Why would the genius coach call that many pass plays if McNabb is so bad? I agree that a better running game will improve McNabbs performance.

Unless Mcnabb's numbers were inflated because he made so many attempts.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
bbatty
piglet
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:48 pm

Re: Mike and Mike say 10-6 for the Skins

Post by bbatty »

Deadskins wrote:
SnyderSucks wrote:
spudstr04 wrote:http://espn.go.com/espnradio/player?rd=1#/podcenter/?id=5447359&autoplay=1&callsign=ESPNRADIO

They say that the better running game in Washington will benefit D-Nabb and that Clinton Portis will have a huge year. Listen to the radio broadcast and let me know what you think. I think 10-6 is a good guess, but I think we know as Redskins fans, that nothing would surprise us, 4-12 to 11-5 is possible with this team.


I had forgotten high a percentage philly was passing. They threw around 60% of plays. That belies all the chatter out of philly about McNabb not being good enough. Why would the genius coach call that many pass plays if McNabb is so bad? I agree that a better running game will improve McNabbs performance.

Unless Mcnabb's numbers were inflated because he made so many attempts.


Mcnabb's numbers can go both way's. Either way I'll take a chance.
cleg
cleg
cleg
Posts: 2649
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Deep in the Heart of Giants Territory

Post by cleg »

from their lips to the football gods ears.
Drinking the Kool-Aid again...
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Post by VetSkinsFan »

Doensn't McNabb have the lowest career INT %?
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
User avatar
Skinna Mob
Hog
Posts: 464
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 1:07 pm
Location: FedEx Field

Post by Skinna Mob »

VetSkinsFan wrote:Doensn't McNabb have the lowest career INT %?


Its from Wikipedia....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_National_Football_League_records_%28individual%29

Lowest pct. Passes Had Intercepted

* Most seasons led league lowest pct. not intercepted 5 Sammy Baugh 1940, 1942, 1944-1945, 1947
* Lowest pct. passes had intercepted career 2.09 Donovan McNabb 1999-2008
* Lowest pct. passes had intercepted season 0.41 Damon Huard 2006
* Lowest pct. passes had intercepted rookie season 1.98 Charlie Batch 1998 2002[3]
"It's almost like, you play a kid's game for a king's ransom," he said. "And if you don't take it serious enough, eventually one day you're going to say, 'Oh, I could have done this, I could have done that."
Sean Taylor

-REDSKINS TILL I DIE-
Post Reply