Kelly on the block/cut?

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Post Reply
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Kelly on the block/cut?

Post by frankcal20 »

The Redskins could cut the next Andre Johnson
Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on July 22, 2010 10:30 AM ET
M. Kelly.jpgBack in March of 2009, Albert Haynesworth was asked to explain why his agent met with Redskins owner Dan Snyder at the NFL Scouting Combine, which appeared to be a crystal clear case of tampering.

The official explanation at the time: Haynesworth's agent Chad Speck and Snyder were discussing wide receiver Malcolm Kelly.

"Chad told me he met with the Redskins at the Combine," Haynesworth said. "But they were talking about Malcolm [Kelly] and how he could become the next Andre Johnson and stuff like that."

Well, the rest of the NFL may get the chance to sign the next Andre Johnson shortly. Ryan O'Halloran of Comcast Sportsnet Washington predicted on Wednesday Kelly won't even make the team because of his injury issues and lack of special teams value.

That information makes it all the more ridiculous the Redskins got off the hook for tampering using the Kelly excuse. It also points out how Washington bungled the second round of that draft.

The team selected Devin Thomas 15 spots ahead of DeSean Jackson, and tight end Fred Davis one spot ahead of Jackson before grabbing Kelly three picks later. (We like Davis plenty, but they still passed on Jackson twice.)

Vinny Cerrato may be gone, but his legacy continues to live on.


I think this is a really stupid article. We all know that Mike loves tall receivers. We know that per Cooley and Campbell, they have said that Kelly has the best hands on the team. He's not afraid to go over the middle and his big play potential is there. So, because he doesn't play on ST's he's not worth a roster spot? Don't think so. He's gonna be our #3 WR or possibly our #2 with Thomas as the #1 if Moss get's hurt or they feel he's better suited for the slot. I hate everything about this article because I really love what Kelly can bring to the team if he can stay on the field a little bit.
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Re: Kelly on the block/cut?

Post by yupchagee »

frankcal20 wrote:
The Redskins could cut the next Andre Johnson
Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on July 22, 2010 10:30 AM ET
M. Kelly.jpgBack in March of 2009, Albert Haynesworth was asked to explain why his agent met with Redskins owner Dan Snyder at the NFL Scouting Combine, which appeared to be a crystal clear case of tampering.

The official explanation at the time: Haynesworth's agent Chad Speck and Snyder were discussing wide receiver Malcolm Kelly.

"Chad told me he met with the Redskins at the Combine," Haynesworth said. "But they were talking about Malcolm [Kelly] and how he could become the next Andre Johnson and stuff like that."

Well, the rest of the NFL may get the chance to sign the next Andre Johnson shortly. Ryan O'Halloran of Comcast Sportsnet Washington predicted on Wednesday Kelly won't even make the team because of his injury issues and lack of special teams value.

That information makes it all the more ridiculous the Redskins got off the hook for tampering using the Kelly excuse. It also points out how Washington bungled the second round of that draft.

The team selected Devin Thomas 15 spots ahead of DeSean Jackson, and tight end Fred Davis one spot ahead of Jackson before grabbing Kelly three picks later. (We like Davis plenty, but they still passed on Jackson twice.)

Vinny Cerrato may be gone, but his legacy continues to live on.


I think this is a really stupid article. We all know that Mike loves tall receivers. We know that per Cooley and Campbell, they have said that Kelly has the best hands on the team. He's not afraid to go over the middle and his big play potential is there. So, because he doesn't play on ST's he's not worth a roster spot? Don't think so. He's gonna be our #3 WR or possibly our #2 with Thomas as the #1 if Moss get's hurt or they feel he's better suited for the slot. I hate everything about this article because I really love what Kelly can bring to the team if he can stay on the field a little bit.



Receivers added since last season:
Armstrong 5"11
Austin 5"11
Banks 5"7
Furrey 6"0
Galloway 5"11
Hodge 6"2
Wade 5"10
Williams 6"0

median height 5"11
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
SnyderSucks
Hog
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:56 pm
Location: Colorado

Andre Johnson

Post by SnyderSucks »

PFT scared the crap out of me with that headline. I thought they were referring to 1996 when Andre Johnson was the number one pick Olineman who got cut without ever playing a down.

Luckily it's just a rehash of the speculation that Kelly or Thomas could get cut.
With the Cardinals reaching the Super Bowl, is Dan Snyder officially the worst owner in the league?
User avatar
brad7686
B-rad
B-rad
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:46 am
Location: De La War

Post by brad7686 »

T.O.!!!
ATX_Skins
ATX
ATX
Posts: 3386
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:59 am
Location: NOVA
Contact:

Post by ATX_Skins »

^^ Agreed, let's just do it already.
Support the troops, especially our snipers.
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

So, because he doesn't play on ST's he's not worth a roster spot? Don't think so


No, he might not be worth a roster spot because after his injuries he doesn't have enough speed to gain any separation from NFL defensive backs.
Suck and Luck
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
So, because he doesn't play on ST's he's not worth a roster spot? Don't think so


No, he might not be worth a roster spot because after his injuries he doesn't have enough speed to gain any separation from NFL defensive backs.



He will be on our roster for 1 simple reason: We have no one better to replace him. We will carry at least 5 WR's. Name 5 on our roster better than Kelly
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

It IS a stupid article... apparently, written by a bitter Titans suck-up...
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

yupchagee wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
So, because he doesn't play on ST's he's not worth a roster spot? Don't think so


No, he might not be worth a roster spot because after his injuries he doesn't have enough speed to gain any separation from NFL defensive backs.



He will be on our roster for 1 simple reason: We have no one better to replace him. We will carry at least 5 WR's. Name 5 on our roster better than Kelly


Wade, Thomas, and Moss are better than Kelly. We also have several rookies/young players in camp that could earn roster spots. I think that Kelly will be one of our 5 wide receivers, but I certainly would not be surprised if Kelly is cut. In two years he has been injured and not productive. He certainly hasn't done a thing to guarantee himself a roster spot.
Suck and Luck
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

he's also been a player in a system that has proven that didn't work. If you were in Zorn's woodshed, that doesn't mean anything. Kelly stayed there amongst other players as well. I agree he's going to battle for his playing time but I don't think he's battling for a roster spot.
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

frankcal20 wrote:he's also been a player in a system that has proven that didn't work. If you were in Zorn's woodshed, that doesn't mean anything. Kelly stayed there amongst other players as well. I agree he's going to battle for his playing time but I don't think he's battling for a roster spot.


You can only blame Zorn so much. It wasn't Zorn's fault that when he was in the game Kelly had a lot of trouble getting separation from defensive backs. Also, Thomas was able to show flashes of potential in Zorn's system, but Kelly wasn't. Sure, he could surprise, but at this point I'm not expecting much out of him.
Suck and Luck
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
frankcal20 wrote:he's also been a player in a system that has proven that didn't work. If you were in Zorn's woodshed, that doesn't mean anything. Kelly stayed there amongst other players as well. I agree he's going to battle for his playing time but I don't think he's battling for a roster spot.


You can only blame Zorn so much. It wasn't Zorn's fault that when he was in the game Kelly had a lot of trouble getting separation from defensive backs. Also, Thomas was able to show flashes of potential in Zorn's system, but Kelly wasn't. Sure, he could surprise, but at this point I'm not expecting much out of him.


Wade 34 catches 367 yards
Kelley 25 catches 347 yards
Thomas 25 catches 325 yards
Not much difference.

Sure, it's possible that several young WR's will explode in preseason, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

Wade 34 catches 367 yards
Kelley 25 catches 347 yards
Thomas 25 catches 325 yards


I see you conveniently left out touchdowns...

Wade - 2
Thomas - 3
Kelly - ZERO
Suck and Luck
Bob 0119
The Punisher
The Punisher
Posts: 2592
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Manassas

Post by Bob 0119 »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
Wade 34 catches 367 yards
Kelley 25 catches 347 yards
Thomas 25 catches 325 yards


I see you conveniently left out touchdowns...

Wade - 2
Thomas - 3
Kelly - ZERO


I seem to recall we didn't have all that many receiving TD's to begin with. How many TD's did Moss have?
“If you grow up in metro Washington, you grow up a diehard Redskins fan. But if you hate your parents, you grow up a Cowboys fan.”-Jim Lachey
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

Bob 0119 wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
Wade 34 catches 367 yards
Kelley 25 catches 347 yards
Thomas 25 catches 325 yards


I see you conveniently left out touchdowns...

Wade - 2
Thomas - 3
Kelly - ZERO


I seem to recall we didn't have all that many receiving TD's to begin with. How many TD's did Moss have?


More than Kelly.
Suck and Luck
User avatar
brad7686
B-rad
B-rad
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:46 am
Location: De La War

Post by brad7686 »

T.O.!!!
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Post by VetSkinsFan »

brad7686 wrote: JUST SAY NO TO T.O.!!!
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
Bob 0119 wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
Wade 34 catches 367 yards
Kelley 25 catches 347 yards
Thomas 25 catches 325 yards


I see you conveniently left out touchdowns...

Wade - 2
Thomas - 3
Kelly - ZERO


I seem to recall we didn't have all that many receiving TD's to begin with. How many TD's did Moss have?


More than Kelly.


I thought it was all Campbell's fault? Now it's Kelly's fault.
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

frankcal20 wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
Bob 0119 wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
Wade 34 catches 367 yards
Kelley 25 catches 347 yards
Thomas 25 catches 325 yards


I see you conveniently left out touchdowns...

Wade - 2
Thomas - 3
Kelly - ZERO


I seem to recall we didn't have all that many receiving TD's to begin with. How many TD's did Moss have?


More than Kelly.


I thought it was all Campbell's fault? Now it's Kelly's fault.


Of course! Campbell's gone sp it's time to find a new scapegoat.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
Law Hog
piglet
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 6:35 pm
Location: Newark, DE

Post by Law Hog »

Sorry, but I still think Kelley may have some potential. Let's give him 3-4 games this year until we decide to give up on him completely.
Law Hog
aka "Justice Hog"


“Laws control the lesser man... Right conduct controls the greater one.”
-Mark Twain
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

frankcal20 wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
Bob 0119 wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
Wade 34 catches 367 yards
Kelley 25 catches 347 yards
Thomas 25 catches 325 yards


I see you conveniently left out touchdowns...

Wade - 2
Thomas - 3
Kelly - ZERO


I seem to recall we didn't have all that many receiving TD's to begin with. How many TD's did Moss have?


More than Kelly.


I thought it was all Campbell's fault? Now it's Kelly's fault.


I never said it was his fault. With his injuries, I just don't think that he is going to do much on the NFL.
Suck and Luck
Post Reply