Haynesworth Still On The Trade Block?

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
crazyhorse1
ch1
ch1
Posts: 3634
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:01 pm
Location: virginia beach

Post by crazyhorse1 »

GoSkins wrote:Hey, unless AH has a good reason for not attending then he, AH, is sending a message to MS that isn't positive. I think this voluntary mini camp is called voluntary because of league rules. I am correct? If so, AH knows this. AH knows MS is all business. In my view AH is thumbing his nose at MS.


If MS is lying about the "voluntary" camp and breaking league rules, he's sending a negative message not only to the players and the NFL, but also to the youth of America.
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

crazyhorse1 wrote:
GoSkins wrote:Hey, unless AH has a good reason for not attending then he, AH, is sending a message to MS that isn't positive. I think this voluntary mini camp is called voluntary because of league rules. I am correct? If so, AH knows this. AH knows MS is all business. In my view AH is thumbing his nose at MS.


If MS is lying about the "voluntary" camp and breaking league rules, he's sending a negative message not only to the players and the NFL, but also to the youth of America.

The league says you can't force players to come to camp. Period. That they are somehow protected from any repercussions of that decision is nonsense. About the only thing the team can't do is suspend them or fine them directly for the act of missing camp. That's it. There is no protection from being cut, traded, losing starting jobs, being criticized my management, ...
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

The league says you can't force players to come to camp. Period. That they are somehow protected from any repercussions of that decision is nonsense.


It's part of the collective bargaining agreement, so there is nothing that the league can do about it.
Suck and Luck
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
The league says you can't force players to come to camp. Period. That they are somehow protected from any repercussions of that decision is nonsense.


It's part of the collective bargaining agreement, so there is nothing that the league can do about it.

I don't understand what you meant, this can be read with multiple meanings. I am saying the teams can't require players directly to come to camp, but players have no other protection from the repercussions of not coming other then they couldn't be punished (e.g., suspended, fined) specifically for not coming to camp. Their roles and even their jobs are not protected. Are you disagreeing with that? If so, how so exactly?
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

KazooSkinsFan wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
The league says you can't force players to come to camp. Period. That they are somehow protected from any repercussions of that decision is nonsense.


It's part of the collective bargaining agreement, so there is nothing that the league can do about it.

I don't understand what you meant, this can be read with multiple meanings. I am saying the teams can't require players directly to come to camp, but players have no other protection from the repercussions of not coming other then they couldn't be punished (e.g., suspended, fined) specifically for not coming to camp. Their roles and even their jobs are not protected. Are you disagreeing with that? If so, how so exactly?


Not disagreeing with anything that you said, just adding on. The reason that teams can't require players to attend these workout and mini camps is because of what was agreed to by the players and owners as part of the collective bargaining agreement. So the league couldn't even change this rule unilaterally if it wanted to. It is something that would have to be collectively bargained with the players.
Suck and Luck
User avatar
fleetus
Hog
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 9:50 am
Location: Charlottesville, Va.

Post by fleetus »

KazooSkinsFan wrote:
crazyhorse1 wrote:
GoSkins wrote:Hey, unless AH has a good reason for not attending then he, AH, is sending a message to MS that isn't positive. I think this voluntary mini camp is called voluntary because of league rules. I am correct? If so, AH knows this. AH knows MS is all business. In my view AH is thumbing his nose at MS.


If MS is lying about the "voluntary" camp and breaking league rules, he's sending a negative message not only to the players and the NFL, but also to the youth of America.

The league says you can't force players to come to camp. Period. That they are somehow protected from any repercussions of that decision is nonsense. About the only thing the team can't do is suspend them or fine them directly for the act of missing camp. That's it. There is no protection from being cut, traded, losing starting jobs, being criticized my management, ...


Yet, every player currently on the Redskins roster plans to be at the VOLUNTARY mini camp tomorrow EXCEPT AH who also happens to be the highest paid Redskin. :-k

I don't know what kind of careers you guys have, but in mine, I have to show up for some extra work when my boss asks me. In return for that cooperation, I also can take the occasional day off without question. AH gets paid the most but expects to work the least. Not a good example and not a very good investment made by the FO. Which I suspect is why they are trying to trade him. Just sayin...
Build through the draft!
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

fleetus wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
crazyhorse1 wrote:
GoSkins wrote:Hey, unless AH has a good reason for not attending then he, AH, is sending a message to MS that isn't positive. I think this voluntary mini camp is called voluntary because of league rules. I am correct? If so, AH knows this. AH knows MS is all business. In my view AH is thumbing his nose at MS.


If MS is lying about the "voluntary" camp and breaking league rules, he's sending a negative message not only to the players and the NFL, but also to the youth of America.

The league says you can't force players to come to camp. Period. That they are somehow protected from any repercussions of that decision is nonsense. About the only thing the team can't do is suspend them or fine them directly for the act of missing camp. That's it. There is no protection from being cut, traded, losing starting jobs, being criticized my management, ...


Yet, every player currently on the Redskins roster plans to be at the VOLUNTARY mini camp tomorrow EXCEPT AH who also happens to be the highest paid Redskin. :-k

I don't know what kind of careers you guys have, but in mine, I have to show up for some extra work when my boss asks me. In return for that cooperation, I also can take the occasional day off without question. AH gets paid the most but expects to work the least. Not a good example and not a very good investment made by the FO. Which I suspect is why they are trying to trade him. Just sayin...


How about we wait until tomorrow to see if he is the only one not participating.
Suck and Luck
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Post by VetSkinsFan »

fleetus wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
crazyhorse1 wrote:
GoSkins wrote:Hey, unless AH has a good reason for not attending then he, AH, is sending a message to MS that isn't positive. I think this voluntary mini camp is called voluntary because of league rules. I am correct? If so, AH knows this. AH knows MS is all business. In my view AH is thumbing his nose at MS.


If MS is lying about the "voluntary" camp and breaking league rules, he's sending a negative message not only to the players and the NFL, but also to the youth of America.

The league says you can't force players to come to camp. Period. That they are somehow protected from any repercussions of that decision is nonsense. About the only thing the team can't do is suspend them or fine them directly for the act of missing camp. That's it. There is no protection from being cut, traded, losing starting jobs, being criticized my management, ...


Yet, every player currently on the Redskins roster plans to be at the VOLUNTARY mini camp tomorrow EXCEPT AH who also happens to be the highest paid Redskin. :-k

I don't know what kind of careers you guys have, but in mine, I have to show up for some extra work when my boss asks me. In return for that cooperation, I also can take the occasional day off without question. AH gets paid the most but expects to work the least. Not a good example and not a very good investment made by the FO. Which I suspect is why they are trying to trade him. Just sayin...


You act like he's laid up on the couch with a martini. He's working out,just not at the Park during VOLUNTARY workouts. VOLUNTARY. Say it with me boys and girls... VOL UN TAR Y.

Wait until mandatory mini camps before forming that lynch mob.
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
crazyhorse1
ch1
ch1
Posts: 3634
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:01 pm
Location: virginia beach

Post by crazyhorse1 »

Gibbs4Life wrote:Haynesworth has disrespected the wishes of Shanahan by not volunteering to workout with his teammates, ok, he's also making so much money that even if he tanks it the rest of the way he's happy.

The thing is normally you would say never give a player with Albert's work ethic a 100million dollar deal, but when you look at our division and how far away we were going into last year, Albert was the FA that most presented an opportunity to be competitive again.

But that was then, this is now, I think disrespecting Shanahan's request partnered with Al's 09' performance is enough to have us contemplate a trade especially when we are depleated (what else is new) of draft picks.

So the question becomes if your looking to trade, where do you send him and for what, obviously a straight up big al for Mcnabb wouldve been great. But now I think another team deserves a phone call...

Call the Lions, they'd like to draft Okung but need a DT, trade them Albert for their #2, then trade back out of #4 and pick up 2 #1's or a 1 and a 3, there is depth at OT in this draft its not Okung or bust at LT. Some think Trent Williams is better than Okung in alot of ways. There's also Bruce Campbell Bulaga and Iupati (more of a guard but we need one of those too)

If we did that we'd have the chance to draft two Olineman in the first two rounds. Or say Trent Williams and Shanny's developmental project under McNeezy....Timmy Tebow


Trading big Al would be a major blow to the defense, especially in regard to sacks. There's no readily apparent way we can make up for losing the best DL in the NFL. Leave the man alone. Aside from needing him badly, it's simply bad policy for the Skin to call for a "voluntary" mini camp and then punish a player for training on his own. Breaking a pact with the player's association is breaking a pact with ALL of our players, which is not the way to go about business. Every player on the team will resent it. If management can't be trusted, why should there be feelings of loyalty?
Naturally, there won't be any.
Already, every Redskin knows Campbell was told he would be the starter this year by MS himself, even after McNabb was acquired. Management should watch what it does if it wants to be respected.
crazyhorse1
ch1
ch1
Posts: 3634
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:01 pm
Location: virginia beach

Post by crazyhorse1 »

Gibbs4Life wrote:Haynesworth has disrespected the wishes of Shanahan by not volunteering to workout with his teammates, ok, he's also making so much money that even if he tanks it the rest of the way he's happy.

The thing is normally you would say never give a player with Albert's work ethic a 100million dollar deal, but when you look at our division and how far away we were going into last year, Albert was the FA that most presented an opportunity to be competitive again.

But that was then, this is now, I think disrespecting Shanahan's request partnered with Al's 09' performance is enough to have us contemplate a trade especially when we are depleated (what else is new) of draft picks.

So the question becomes if your looking to trade, where do you send him and for what, obviously a straight up big al for Mcnabb wouldve been great. But now I think another team deserves a phone call...

Call the Lions, they'd like to draft Okung but need a DT, trade them Albert for their #2, then trade back out of #4 and pick up 2 #1's or a 1 and a 3, there is depth at OT in this draft its not Okung or bust at LT. Some think Trent Williams is better than Okung in alot of ways. There's also Bruce Campbell Bulaga and Iupati (more of a guard but we need one of those too)

If we did that we'd have the chance to draft two Olineman in the first two rounds. Or say Trent Williams and Shanny's developmental project under McNeezy....Timmy Tebow


A straight up trade of Haynesworth for McNabb would have been bonkers.
No way a 34 year old quarterback with major accuracy and durability problems is worth a DL of Haynesworth's quality. There's too much gaga about McNabb on this board-- his numbers don't justify it. Also, there's too much gaga about Allen and MS. All they've done so far is acquire either poor or over-the-hill players (with the possible exception of McNabb) and fail to pursue or acquire superior players. They didn't so much as wave a cape at guys like Dansby, Pashos, and Brandon Marshall-- all three would have been of immense help.
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

Already, every Redskin knows Campbell was told he would be the starter this year by MS himself, even after McNabb was acquired.


Interesting... everything I have heard or read has said specifically the opposite... that there would be a competition for every position, including quarterback.

Care to share a quote?

... a link?
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
User avatar
fleetus
Hog
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 9:50 am
Location: Charlottesville, Va.

Post by fleetus »

VetSkinsFan wrote:
fleetus wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
crazyhorse1 wrote:
GoSkins wrote:Hey, unless AH has a good reason for not attending then he, AH, is sending a message to MS that isn't positive. I think this voluntary mini camp is called voluntary because of league rules. I am correct? If so, AH knows this. AH knows MS is all business. In my view AH is thumbing his nose at MS.


If MS is lying about the "voluntary" camp and breaking league rules, he's sending a negative message not only to the players and the NFL, but also to the youth of America.

The league says you can't force players to come to camp. Period. That they are somehow protected from any repercussions of that decision is nonsense. About the only thing the team can't do is suspend them or fine them directly for the act of missing camp. That's it. There is no protection from being cut, traded, losing starting jobs, being criticized my management, ...


Yet, every player currently on the Redskins roster plans to be at the VOLUNTARY mini camp tomorrow EXCEPT AH who also happens to be the highest paid Redskin. :-k

I don't know what kind of careers you guys have, but in mine, I have to show up for some extra work when my boss asks me. In return for that cooperation, I also can take the occasional day off without question. AH gets paid the most but expects to work the least. Not a good example and not a very good investment made by the FO. Which I suspect is why they are trying to trade him. Just sayin...


You act like he's laid up on the couch with a martini. He's working out,just not at the Park during VOLUNTARY workouts. VOLUNTARY. Say it with me boys and girls... VOL UN TAR Y.

Wait until mandatory mini camps before forming that lynch mob.


Defend it any way you want. But the brass tax is, AH is the only player who thinks he's above voluntary camp. You can hang your hat on the word voluntary all you want. The NFL is a team sport. Coaches work hard to instill a team concept. Haynesworth is the exception to the Redskins team concept right now. We'll see tomorrow. If I'm wrong, I'll gladly admit it.

You can paint as pretty a picture as you want about it. But the bottom line is, MS has tried to trade him and by all reports, still trying to trade him. No offense, but based on the history of AH, the player vs. the history of MS the coach, I'll put my faith in MS on this issue. If MS sits down with AH and hears something worth taking him off the trade block, then I'll more than likely agree with that move too. For now, AH is a distraction and setting a poor example for his teammates.
Build through the draft!
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:I don't understand what you meant, this can be read with multiple meanings. I am saying the teams can't require players directly to come to camp, but players have no other protection from the repercussions of not coming other then they couldn't be punished (e.g., suspended, fined) specifically for not coming to camp. Their roles and even their jobs are not protected. Are you disagreeing with that? If so, how so exactly?


Not disagreeing with anything that you said, just adding on. The reason that teams can't require players to attend these workout and mini camps is because of what was agreed to by the players and owners as part of the collective bargaining agreement. So the league couldn't even change this rule unilaterally if it wanted to. It is something that would have to be collectively bargained with the players.

Gotcha. I agree.
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

fleetus wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
crazyhorse1 wrote:
GoSkins wrote:Hey, unless AH has a good reason for not attending then he, AH, is sending a message to MS that isn't positive. I think this voluntary mini camp is called voluntary because of league rules. I am correct? If so, AH knows this. AH knows MS is all business. In my view AH is thumbing his nose at MS.


If MS is lying about the "voluntary" camp and breaking league rules, he's sending a negative message not only to the players and the NFL, but also to the youth of America.

The league says you can't force players to come to camp. Period. That they are somehow protected from any repercussions of that decision is nonsense. About the only thing the team can't do is suspend them or fine them directly for the act of missing camp. That's it. There is no protection from being cut, traded, losing starting jobs, being criticized my management, ...


Yet, every player currently on the Redskins roster plans to be at the VOLUNTARY mini camp tomorrow EXCEPT AH who also happens to be the highest paid Redskin. :-k

I don't know what kind of careers you guys have, but in mine, I have to show up for some extra work when my boss asks me. In return for that cooperation, I also can take the occasional day off without question. AH gets paid the most but expects to work the least. Not a good example and not a very good investment made by the FO. Which I suspect is why they are trying to trade him. Just sayin...

I don't know how you could possibly get out of my post that I am OK with AH not coming to camp since I neither said nor think that.
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
User avatar
fleetus
Hog
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 9:50 am
Location: Charlottesville, Va.

Post by fleetus »

KazooSkinsFan wrote:
fleetus wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
crazyhorse1 wrote:
GoSkins wrote:Hey, unless AH has a good reason for not attending then he, AH, is sending a message to MS that isn't positive. I think this voluntary mini camp is called voluntary because of league rules. I am correct? If so, AH knows this. AH knows MS is all business. In my view AH is thumbing his nose at MS.


If MS is lying about the "voluntary" camp and breaking league rules, he's sending a negative message not only to the players and the NFL, but also to the youth of America.

The league says you can't force players to come to camp. Period. That they are somehow protected from any repercussions of that decision is nonsense. About the only thing the team can't do is suspend them or fine them directly for the act of missing camp. That's it. There is no protection from being cut, traded, losing starting jobs, being criticized my management, ...


Yet, every player currently on the Redskins roster plans to be at the VOLUNTARY mini camp tomorrow EXCEPT AH who also happens to be the highest paid Redskin. :-k

I don't know what kind of careers you guys have, but in mine, I have to show up for some extra work when my boss asks me. In return for that cooperation, I also can take the occasional day off without question. AH gets paid the most but expects to work the least. Not a good example and not a very good investment made by the FO. Which I suspect is why they are trying to trade him. Just sayin...

I don't know how you could possibly get out of my post that I am OK with AH not coming to camp since I neither said nor think that.



Sorry, I was adressing the several AH apologists. It was more directed at GoSkins quote than yours. Looks like I may have been slightly wrong if reports about McINtosh's absence is correct. We knew JC's absence was agreed by Shanny. Not sure about Rocky.

It says something about JC's character that he is studying the playbook even though he's waiting to be traded.
Build through the draft!
The Hogster
#######
#######
Posts: 7225
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by The Hogster »

I can't stand AH, but I am reluctant to trade him. That would give him exactly what he wants. And, switching to the 3-4 we need as many playmakers as we can get. Kemo is coming off of knee surgery and we have no other legit NT on the roster.
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
User avatar
fleetus
Hog
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 9:50 am
Location: Charlottesville, Va.

Post by fleetus »

The Hogster wrote:I can't stand AH, but I am reluctant to trade him. That would give him exactly what he wants. And, switching to the 3-4 we need as many playmakers as we can get. Kemo is coming off of knee surgery and we have no other legit NT on the roster.


There are legit NT's in the draft and we could trade AH for a decent pick or two. If B. Marshall brings two 2nd rounders, AH should too IMO. MArshall's cap hit is bigger than AH's too.
Build through the draft!
The Hogster
#######
#######
Posts: 7225
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by The Hogster »

fleetus wrote:
The Hogster wrote:I can't stand AH, but I am reluctant to trade him. That would give him exactly what he wants. And, switching to the 3-4 we need as many playmakers as we can get. Kemo is coming off of knee surgery and we have no other legit NT on the roster.


There are legit NT's in the draft and we could trade AH for a decent pick or two. If B. Marshall brings two 2nd rounders, AH should too IMO. MArshall's cap hit is bigger than AH's too.


If we could get 2 2nd rounders, I would be up for that. But, I am not sure that we can pull that off.
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
chiefhog44
**ch44
**ch44
Posts: 2444
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: Chicago

Post by chiefhog44 »

Looks like he wants out...

Due to his frustration with a potential move to nose tackle, Albert Haynesworth is reportedly hoping to be traded during the NFL Draft.

The Washington Post cites "two people in the organization familiar with his situation." Haynesworth is skipping voluntary minicamp this weekend and will only report to mandatory minicamp in June. Despite Mike Shanahan's comments to the contrary, we fully expect him to be available for the right price next week. The Titans, Lions, and Rams are the most likely trade partners.

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/clubho ... ajteam=WAS
Miss you 21

12/17/09 - Ding Dong the Witch is Dead...Which Old Witch? The Wicked Witch.

1/6/10 - The start of another dark era
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

Adam Shefter (sp) who is rarely wrong and who is extremely close to Mike Shannahan reported that Al is NOT getting traded.

Glad to hear it.

1. We need AH.
2. It'll irritate some of you.

I believe we now have 2 guys that can play NT that we've brought in. Apparently Anthony Montgomery is slated to play that position too. I don't expect to see Al at that position too much.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

Chris Luva Luva wrote:Adam Shefter (sp) who is rarely wrong and who is extremely close to Mike Shannahan reported that Al is NOT getting traded.

Glad to hear it.

1. We need AH.
2. It'll irritate some of you.

I believe we now have 2 guys that can play NT that we've brought in. Apparently Anthony Montgomery is slated to play that position too. I don't expect to see Al at that position too much.


1) Kemo is coming off a major injury & might not be ready for a while.
2) Peterson in 3 years has played in 9 games % has 11 tackles (5 solo). He hasn't played. He's also been injured a lot.
3) Based on the last 2 years, Montgomery can't play anywhere.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

Count me in the camp that sees Haynesworth here this coming season

and, I think we're better off :lol:
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
User avatar
fleetus
Hog
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 9:50 am
Location: Charlottesville, Va.

Post by fleetus »

SkinsJock wrote:Count me in the camp that sees Haynesworth here this coming season

and, I think we're better off :lol:


I say it all depends on the quality of offers during the draft. He's available, no mistake about it. But considering the 21M payout, Shan-Allen will demand a big return.

Haynesworth's former coach, Schwartz, now the HC in Detroit has already brought in one former Titan, Van den Bosch. Wouldn't surprise me if he swapped the #2 for Skins #4 and added their 2nd rounder (and maybe more) to get Haynesworth. Skins then pick Suh or Okung and add a nice high 2nd round pick for another O-lineman.

Detroit appeases fans by getting top player like Haynesworth but still manages to draft a LT for Stafford. Skins get rid of a locker room cancer who doesn't want to be here and adds a couple pics in the process. I think Suh is undoubtedly THE BEST player in the draft, so if it was possible to get him + some extra picks + rid the team of a problem child, the Skins would be a better team. Just one theory.
Build through the draft!
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

fleetus wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:Count me in the camp that sees Haynesworth here this coming season

and, I think we're better off :lol:


I say it all depends on the quality of offers during the draft. He's available, no mistake about it. But considering the 21M payout, Shan-Allen will demand a big return.

Haynesworth's former coach, Schwartz, now the HC in Detroit has already brought in one former Titan, Van den Bosch. Wouldn't surprise me if he swapped the #2 for Skins #4 and added their 2nd rounder (and maybe more) to get Haynesworth. Skins then pick Suh or Okung and add a nice high 2nd round pick for another O-lineman.

Detroit appeases fans by getting top player like Haynesworth but still manages to draft a LT for Stafford. Skins get rid of a locker room cancer who doesn't want to be here and adds a couple pics in the process. I think Suh is undoubtedly THE BEST player in the draft, so if it was possible to get him + some extra picks + rid the team of a problem child, the Skins would be a better team. Just one theory.


That deal doesn't really make sense from our perspective. All that we would be getting out of that is a high 2nd rounder, which isn't worth trading AH for. Yes we would get the 2nd overall pick, but we should be able to get Okung at 4 so there is no real need to trade up two spots.
Suck and Luck
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

fleetus wrote:Skins get rid of a locker room cancer

No doubt AH is a pouter with a big ego, but to be a "locker room cancer" that means he's having a negative impact on the team. What is your accusation based on? I hear what he says, I don't hear other players saying how it's harming the team or them. So what is your evidence that's happening?
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
Post Reply