Jim Haslett mentioned for DC

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Gibbs4Life
G4L
G4L
Posts: 2363
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Location: no
Contact:

Jim Haslett mentioned for DC

Post by Gibbs4Life »

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/player ... 775&spln=1



This is the first I've seen of Haslett's name being mentioned, I'd be down but Zimmer is the real prize


We're going to have to hire alot of coaches, coordinators and position coaches.
HAIL
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
+++++++++
Posts: 5227
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
Contact:

Post by Skinsfan55 »

And Haslett is a 3-4 coach.
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
Redskin in Canada
~~~~~~
~~~~~~
Posts: 10323
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 9:59 am
Location: Canada

Re: Jim Haslett mentioned for DC

Post by Redskin in Canada »

Gibbs4Life wrote:http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/playerbreakingnews.asp?sport=NFL&id=131&line=165775&spln=1



This is the first I've seen of Haslett's name being mentioned, I'd be down but Zimmer is the real prize


We're going to have to hire alot of coaches, coordinators and position coaches.

Do not believe this noise. It will not happen from what I know so far.
Daniel Snyder has defined incompetence, failure and greed to true Washington Redskins fans for over a decade and a half. Stay away from football operations !!!
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

I was listening to Arrington yesterday and they said that we have the personnel for the 3-4 now. Orakpo and Carter as your OLB's, Haynesworth at NT, McIntosh and Fletch at MLB. Not sure I want to go that route just because it's so trendy right now but I like the attitude that Haslett has. He's not going to put up with crap.
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

frankcal20 wrote:I was listening to Arrington yesterday and they said that we have the personnel for the 3-4 now. Orakpo and Carter as your OLB's, Haynesworth at NT, McIntosh and Fletch at MLB. Not sure I want to go that route just because it's so trendy right now but I like the attitude that Haslett has. He's not going to put up with crap.


The Carter linebacker experiment has already been tried and it failed big time.
Suck and Luck
ferryrich
Hog
Posts: 488
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: UK

Post by ferryrich »

For the first time in years, we've got 2 pass rushing DE and dominant DT, so now is the time to swap to 3-4?

I would have understood it when we had years of run first DEs with no pass rush, but now? I'd have thought a bit of a tweak (Orakpo at DE full time and allowing Albert to do his stuff) would sort out the line and the backers just need a bit of help.
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
+++++++++
Posts: 5227
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
Contact:

Post by Skinsfan55 »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
frankcal20 wrote:I was listening to Arrington yesterday and they said that we have the personnel for the 3-4 now. Orakpo and Carter as your OLB's, Haynesworth at NT, McIntosh and Fletch at MLB. Not sure I want to go that route just because it's so trendy right now but I like the attitude that Haslett has. He's not going to put up with crap.


The Carter linebacker experiment has already been tried and it failed big time.


How did it fail? He played one season! In 2005 he played OLB, and he did pretty well. (4.5 sacks, 2 PD, 35 tkl.) He didn't fail and he surely didn't fail "big time".

I'm not saying we should switch to the 3-4, but Andre Carter would be the least of our concerns if we did.
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

I agree but in all honesty, I don't want the 3-4 to come in only because I'm comfortable with the 4-3. The defense overall is only a few pieces away from being dominate. And I think that getting sure tackling vet's in here will go a long way.
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

Skinsfan55 wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
frankcal20 wrote:I was listening to Arrington yesterday and they said that we have the personnel for the 3-4 now. Orakpo and Carter as your OLB's, Haynesworth at NT, McIntosh and Fletch at MLB. Not sure I want to go that route just because it's so trendy right now but I like the attitude that Haslett has. He's not going to put up with crap.


The Carter linebacker experiment has already been tried and it failed big time.


How did it fail? He played one season! In 2005 he played OLB, and he did pretty well. (4.5 sacks, 2 PD, 35 tkl.) He didn't fail and he surely didn't fail "big time".

I'm not saying we should switch to the 3-4, but Andre Carter would be the least of our concerns if we did.


It failed because he couldn't cover anybody while playing as a linebacker. His stats for that season (along with 2007) are the worst in his career. He struggled both in coverage and at rushing the passer from the linebacker spot. Carter is a defensive end, not a linebacker. We've played enough guys out of position over the years and it needs to stop.
Suck and Luck
Bob 0119
The Punisher
The Punisher
Posts: 2592
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Manassas

Post by Bob 0119 »

frankcal20 wrote:I agree but in all honesty, I don't want the 3-4 to come in only because I'm comfortable with the 4-3. The defense overall is only a few pieces away from being dominate. And I think that getting sure tackling vet's in here will go a long way.


Those pieces being corners, safties, and a couple of linebackers.
“If you grow up in metro Washington, you grow up a diehard Redskins fan. But if you hate your parents, you grow up a Cowboys fan.”-Jim Lachey
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

I think we are fine at linebacker for the 3-4 and Hall, under the right coach can be very good. Rogers I think has the skill set for the position but he really needs to be coached up and the one person I blame for the defense giving up the big plays is Gray. He say's a lot of the right things but you've got to do something for guys failing to make plays they should like catch the ball or make a tackle vs just delivering a big hit that guys can take.
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

frankcal20 wrote:I think we are fine at linebacker for the 3-4 and Hall, under the right coach can be very good. Rogers I think has the skill set for the position but he really needs to be coached up and the one person I blame for the defense giving up the big plays is Gray. He say's a lot of the right things but you've got to do something for guys failing to make plays they should like catch the ball or make a tackle vs just delivering a big hit that guys can take.


I have to disagree. Rogers and Hall are simply not cutting, both with their physical ability and attitude on the field. You can add Landry to that group as well.

As for the 3-4, we don't have the personnel for that. For starters, it would be a tremendous waste of Haynesworth's talent to use him as a NT, whose primary duty is to take up blockers. We don't really have the defensive ends for a 3-4, unless you want to rely on a 37-year old Philip Daniels and a 36-year old Renaldo Wynn.

With Orakpo it's obvious that he plays at his best with his hand on the ground and Carter did not fare well in 2005 when playing linebacker in a 3-4.
Suck and Luck
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

In addition, if you think that Haynesworth was out-of-line with his complaints about how he was used by Blache, just imagine how he is going to react to being a NT in a 3-4.
Suck and Luck
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

As I stated in my first post - I'm only regurgitating what Lavar Arrington said yesterday on the radio. WTH do I know about the 3-4 or 4-3. My whole life I played WR and all the kicking positions. I never played defense outside of pop warner football and if you call that football - then well.....
skinsfan#33
#33
#33
Posts: 4084
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am

Post by skinsfan#33 »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
frankcal20 wrote:I was listening to Arrington yesterday and they said that we have the personnel for the 3-4 now. Orakpo and Carter as your OLB's, Haynesworth at NT, McIntosh and Fletch at MLB. Not sure I want to go that route just because it's so trendy right now but I like the attitude that Haslett has. He's not going to put up with crap.


The Carter linebacker experiment has already been tried and it failed big time.


You beat me to it. If I was tabbing OLB sfor a 3-4 that are on our roster I would be looking at Orakpo and Wilson. London and Rockey or London and Blades as the ILBs.

DL - Jarmin, Hanyneworth, Alexander
Trade Carter if you can, good time after his best season. If not he would play DE on non-run downs.
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
+++++++++
Posts: 5227
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
Contact:

Post by Skinsfan55 »

Haynesworth would actually most likely be a DE in a 3-4 scheme (Big Al was great when occasionally moved to end with the Titans) also, Andre Carter played one year as a LB and actually did well. 4.5 sacks, 35 tackles, 2 PD. It takes time to learn a new position. It just happens that one season later a 4-3 team like the Redskins wanted him back at end.
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

Haynesworth would actually most likely be a DE in a 3-4 scheme (Big Al was great when occasionally moved to end with the Titans)


Sorry, but that's ridiculous. Haynesworth is 350 pounds, which, even for a 3-4 is far too big for a DE. Take the Chargers for example, a 3-4 team. Their starting DE's are 290 and 295, respectively. The Steelers, another 3-4 team, have a 285 pound and a 298 pound defense ends. The only 3-4 defensive end that I could find that even comes close to Haynewsworth's size is Igor Olshansky of the Cowboys and he is 35 pounds lighter than Big Al.
Suck and Luck
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Post by VetSkinsFan »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
frankcal20 wrote:I think we are fine at linebacker for the 3-4 and Hall, under the right coach can be very good. Rogers I think has the skill set for the position but he really needs to be coached up and the one person I blame for the defense giving up the big plays is Gray. He say's a lot of the right things but you've got to do something for guys failing to make plays they should like catch the ball or make a tackle vs just delivering a big hit that guys can take.


I have to disagree. Rogers and Hall are simply not cutting, both with their physical ability and attitude on the field. You can add Landry to that group as well.


So you have 3 of the 4 starting DBs on a team with the same deficiency, and you DON'T blame the coaches? Makes perfect sense to me... :roll:
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

VetSkinsFan wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
frankcal20 wrote:I think we are fine at linebacker for the 3-4 and Hall, under the right coach can be very good. Rogers I think has the skill set for the position but he really needs to be coached up and the one person I blame for the defense giving up the big plays is Gray. He say's a lot of the right things but you've got to do something for guys failing to make plays they should like catch the ball or make a tackle vs just delivering a big hit that guys can take.


I have to disagree. Rogers and Hall are simply not cutting, both with their physical ability and attitude on the field. You can add Landry to that group as well.


So you have 3 of the 4 starting DBs on a team with the same deficiency, and you DON'T blame the coaches? Makes perfect sense to me... :roll:


They all have their own deficiencies, but they all also share the same deficiencies, such as generally acting like fools on the field. I'm frankly sick and tired of watching Landry bob his head like an idiot and Rogers celebrate when he gets beat badly but gets lucky because a receiver dropped the ball. For Hall this is the third team that he hasn't been able to cut it on and Landry, generally speaking, acts like an immature punk on the field.
Suck and Luck
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

VetSkinsFan wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
frankcal20 wrote:I think we are fine at linebacker for the 3-4 and Hall, under the right coach can be very good. Rogers I think has the skill set for the position but he really needs to be coached up and the one person I blame for the defense giving up the big plays is Gray. He say's a lot of the right things but you've got to do something for guys failing to make plays they should like catch the ball or make a tackle vs just delivering a big hit that guys can take.


I have to disagree. Rogers and Hall are simply not cutting, both with their physical ability and attitude on the field. You can add Landry to that group as well.


So you have 3 of the 4 starting DBs on a team with the same deficiency, and you DON'T blame the coaches? Makes perfect sense to me... :roll:


I also have a hard time blaming Gray because Tryon, Moore, Horton, and Doughty have all improved under him. I think what separates them from Hall, Rogers, and Landry is attitude.
Suck and Luck
skinsfan#33
#33
#33
Posts: 4084
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am

Post by skinsfan#33 »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
VetSkinsFan wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
frankcal20 wrote:I think we are fine at linebacker for the 3-4 and Hall, under the right coach can be very good. Rogers I think has the skill set for the position but he really needs to be coached up and the one person I blame for the defense giving up the big plays is Gray. He say's a lot of the right things but you've got to do something for guys failing to make plays they should like catch the ball or make a tackle vs just delivering a big hit that guys can take.


I have to disagree. Rogers and Hall are simply not cutting, both with their physical ability and attitude on the field. You can add Landry to that group as well.


So you have 3 of the 4 starting DBs on a team with the same deficiency, and you DON'T blame the coaches? Makes perfect sense to me... :roll:


I also have a hard time blaming Gray because Tryon, Moore, Horton, and Doughty have all improved under him. I think what separates them from Hall, Rogers, and Landry is attitude.


Attitude can be adjusted with the application of the right amount of preasure!
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
Haynesworth would actually most likely be a DE in a 3-4 scheme (Big Al was great when occasionally moved to end with the Titans)


Sorry, but that's ridiculous. Haynesworth is 350 pounds, which, even for a 3-4 is far too big for a DE. Take the Chargers for example, a 3-4 team. Their starting DE's are 290 and 295, respectively. The Steelers, another 3-4 team, have a 285 pound and a 298 pound defense ends. The only 3-4 defensive end that I could find that even comes close to Haynewsworth's size is Igor Olshansky of the Cowboys and he is 35 pounds lighter than Big Al.


The primary role of a DT in a 4-3 is to soak up blockers, and occupy holes. The primary role of the NT AND the DE's in a 3-4 is to soak up blockers and occupy holes.

Tell me why it would matter whether Haynesworth is over the Center or over a Tackle in a 3-4. From either postition, he would still be devastating when in the game. Personally, I don't believe that we have the personnel for a 3-4, which is designed to feature the linebackers...
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Post by Irn-Bru »

Countertrey wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
Haynesworth would actually most likely be a DE in a 3-4 scheme (Big Al was great when occasionally moved to end with the Titans)


Sorry, but that's ridiculous. Haynesworth is 350 pounds, which, even for a 3-4 is far too big for a DE. Take the Chargers for example, a 3-4 team. Their starting DE's are 290 and 295, respectively. The Steelers, another 3-4 team, have a 285 pound and a 298 pound defense ends. The only 3-4 defensive end that I could find that even comes close to Haynewsworth's size is Igor Olshansky of the Cowboys and he is 35 pounds lighter than Big Al.


The primary role of a DT in a 4-3 is to soak up blockers, and occupy holes. The primary role of the NT AND the DE's in a 3-4 is to soak up blockers and occupy holes.

Tell me why it would matter whether Haynesworth is over the Center or over a Tackle in a 3-4. From either postition, he would still be devastating when in the game. Personally, I don't believe that we have the personnel for a 3-4, which is designed to feature the linebackers...


I think we have the DT and maybe 1-2 LBs for a 3-4. But I don't see a single DE on our roster, outside of Orakpo, who would be a force in the 3-4. Maybe a much younger Daniels.

Haynesworth would be fine, I think, in a 3-4. He'd complain a lot, probably, but the man is a talent and could adjust to the new role fine.

Still, I'd hate to see us switch. This line is a classic 4-3 build, and I agree with you that we don't have the LBs to pull off the switch.
DEHog
Diesel
Diesel
Posts: 7425
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:03 pm
Location: FedEx Field
Contact:

Post by DEHog »

Irn-Bru wrote:
Countertrey wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
Haynesworth would actually most likely be a DE in a 3-4 scheme (Big Al was great when occasionally moved to end with the Titans)


Sorry, but that's ridiculous. Haynesworth is 350 pounds, which, even for a 3-4 is far too big for a DE. Take the Chargers for example, a 3-4 team. Their starting DE's are 290 and 295, respectively. The Steelers, another 3-4 team, have a 285 pound and a 298 pound defense ends. The only 3-4 defensive end that I could find that even comes close to Haynewsworth's size is Igor Olshansky of the Cowboys and he is 35 pounds lighter than Big Al.


The primary role of a DT in a 4-3 is to soak up blockers, and occupy holes. The primary role of the NT AND the DE's in a 3-4 is to soak up blockers and occupy holes.

Tell me why it would matter whether Haynesworth is over the Center or over a Tackle in a 3-4. From either postition, he would still be devastating when in the game. Personally, I don't believe that we have the personnel for a 3-4, which is designed to feature the linebackers...


I think we have the DT and maybe 1-2 LBs for a 3-4. But I don't see a single DE on our roster, outside of Orakpo, who would be a force in the 3-4. Maybe a much younger Daniels.

Haynesworth would be fine, I think, in a 3-4. He'd complain a lot, probably, but the man is a talent and could adjust to the new role fine.

Still, I'd hate to see us switch. This line is a classic 4-3 build, and I agree with you that we don't have the LBs to pull off the switch.


Chris Wilson??? But I agree the personel we have is for a 4-3....either way I want Orakpo getting after the QB not covering!
"Sean Taylor is hands down the best athlete I've ever coached it's not even close" Gregg Williams 2005 Mini-Camp
User avatar
SKINFAN
Hog
Posts: 1659
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Sterling, Virginia

Post by SKINFAN »

I just want Haynesworth and Rak on the same side.... 3/4, 4/3 I care not, put them on the same side!
#21 (36) This IS and will always be the High watermark where all new DB's are measured.


Proverbs 27:17
Post Reply