cleg wrote:RayNAustin wrote:The rule itself is a mockery. It is an insult to common sense, and should be an insult to all minorities.
Anytime you specifically use race as a criteria, it's racism. You cannot stand against racism by advocating and employing racism, anymore than you can stand against dishonesty by lying.
If I were Gray, I would have been smart enough to understand the deal, and not participate in such transparently obvious nonsense.
But the same thing occurred with Blache and Williams ...
This is just simple minded thinking. In order for racism to exist a power relationship must exist first. I.E. white people in positions of power intentionally exclude non-white who are not in power. A minority group cannot be racist - they can be bigots and hateful of other races but they cannot be racist and affect institutional change on the majority race.
The Rooney rule, while not elegant is justified because prior NFL owners (the power) were not hiring qualified black coaches with only a few small exceptions (Art Shell, Dennis Green and Ray Rhoades). Without the Rooeny rule Lovie Smith may never have been hired, Marvin Lewis, Tony Dungy, Mike Tomlin, etc. These guys were interviewed multiple times by other teams who knew they wanted to hire other coaches but it got their name out there. Without the Rooney rule I doubt the socially "progressive" billionaire owners of the 32 NFL teams would look much outside thier Good Old Boy network for coaches like most Division I college football programs.
Just beacuse we have come a long way in this country with relations between the races it is simply lazy and arrogant to think racism - especially institutional racism no longer exists.
I couldn't read the whole thing so I don't know if I' agreeing or not. I'll say I got as far as you saying minority's can't be racist. I like to think anyone or any group can be racist. If anyone is singling out another group of people based off of color or sex or nationality then they can be racist. Yeah we call the sex part sexist but essentially it's the same.
How about reverse discrimination?