Sam Bradford

Washington Football Game Day discussions for 2003, 2004, and 2005
Locked

If Shannahan wants him, are you ok with it?

Yes
14
56%
No
11
44%
 
Total votes: 25

ATX_Skins
ATX
ATX
Posts: 3386
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:59 am
Location: NOVA
Contact:

Sam Bradford

Post by ATX_Skins »

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... -bradford/

You can read into this however you want but bottom line is we don't even have Shannahan yet. Just thought I'd share the link.
Support the troops, especially our snipers.
ATX_Skins
ATX
ATX
Posts: 3386
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:59 am
Location: NOVA
Contact:

Post by ATX_Skins »

I suppose I will start. This move would be a huge mistake, If anything I would like to draft Pike if we just HAVE to take a QB. Im not opposed with a QB in the first round as long as almost every round after we address the o-line and spots on D.
Support the troops, especially our snipers.
User avatar
so.il.SKINSFAN
piggie
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 2:03 am
Location: Eldorado, Illinois

Post by so.il.SKINSFAN »

Bradford is the next Chad Pennington in my opinion.
cleg
cleg
cleg
Posts: 2649
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Deep in the Heart of Giants Territory

Post by cleg »

I don't pretend to know much about which college QB's make good pro's but I don't think I like this idea.
Drinking the Kool-Aid again...
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

ATX_Skins wrote:I suppose I will start. This move would be a huge mistake, If anything I would like to draft Pike if we just HAVE to take a QB. Im not opposed with a QB in the first round as long as almost every round after we address the o-line and spots on D.


so let me understand this - IF Shanahan is the HC and if he and the rest of the new FO group decide that Bradford is going to be the best pick of the draft for this franchise, in your opinion that "would be a huge mistake" - I think I'd trust the guys in charge to know a little more and in my opinion they are going to be incredibly aware of how important the offensive line and other issues with this franchise are to their future

sorry, but if the new guys in the FO want to keep running things here and keeping Snyder away from meddling with this franchise again they will not be making any bad choices with that first pick and they get my vote no matter who they pick
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

What do I know. I don't know what they are looking for. Some of us think we know, but we don't know.

As stated in this article, he's not going to be ready to play next year so using a first round pick on a QB who isn't going to play isn't a luxury we can afford. I think we are positioning for other players.
ATX_Skins
ATX
ATX
Posts: 3386
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:59 am
Location: NOVA
Contact:

Post by ATX_Skins »

SkinsJock wrote:
ATX_Skins wrote:I suppose I will start. This move would be a huge mistake, If anything I would like to draft Pike if we just HAVE to take a QB. Im not opposed with a QB in the first round as long as almost every round after we address the o-line and spots on D.


so let me understand this - IF Shanahan is the HC and if he and the rest of the new FO group decide that Bradford is going to be the best pick of the draft for this franchise, in your opinion that "would be a huge mistake" - I think I'd trust the guys in charge to know a little more and in my opinion they are going to be incredibly aware of how important the offensive line and other issues with this franchise are to their future

sorry, but if the new guys in the FO want to keep running things here and keeping Snyder away from meddling with this franchise again they will not be making any bad choices with that first pick and they get my vote no matter who they pick


You understand well. I think Pike makes a better pro QB. We go through coaches like a confused high school slut. What makes you think Shanahan will be here in 4-5 years, thats why I think Pike is the better choice. Plain and simple.
Support the troops, especially our snipers.
User avatar
riggofan
HereComesTheDiesel
HereComesTheDiesel
Posts: 9460
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:29 pm
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Post by riggofan »

The Redskins could draft Peyton Manning Jr. in April. Its pointless if they don't get some quality players on the offensive line.

All I know about Sam Bradford is that he's a junior who played like two games this season, Mel Kiper likes him, and he's been hurt twice badly this year. Anybody really prepared to throw your first round pick at that?

As much as Vinny sucked, at least Orakpo was a solid and safe pick. We really can't afford any busts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"You can't do epic **** with basic people." - DJax
"We're on the rise, man, whether you're on the train or not." - Josh Norman
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

That's my point with the draft. You've got to take someone who #1 fills a need and #2 is a lock to be a starter day 1.

I don't think you have to get a franchise QB if he's available. Because every year there is speculation that the QB's are franchise guys but it's usually the other way around - flukes or just plain serviceable.
User avatar
PAPDOG67
Hog
Posts: 1047
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:51 pm
Location: Staten Island

Post by PAPDOG67 »

Clausen is the only QB I would draft in the top 5. If he's not there get Okung or Berry. If they're both off the board, trade down and get more picks....this is a deep draft.
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

In order to believe the article, you must also believe that Shanahan has been running this team since February of '09.

Whatever. :roll:
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
User avatar
riggofan
HereComesTheDiesel
HereComesTheDiesel
Posts: 9460
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:29 pm
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Post by riggofan »

frankcal20 wrote:That's my point with the draft. You've got to take someone who #1 fills a need and #2 is a lock to be a starter day 1.

I don't think you have to get a franchise QB if he's available. Because every year there is speculation that the QB's are franchise guys but it's usually the other way around - flukes or just plain serviceable.


Totally agree. I think if we were in a little better position you could roll the dice and go for a franchise QB. But personally I'd rather get some help on the o-line if possible and go with Campbell or a half decent free agent guy for a year.

It would just suck to spend a high pick on the next big franchise QB and bring home Jamarcus Russell.

I kind of agree about Jimmy Clausen though. The thing I like about him is that he's been pretty good without being on an especially great team. That's the kind of guy we need for sure.
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

I'm not worried about who these guys pick - in many cases the reason a player does not live up to expectations can be explained by how the player was prepared and coached - I have faith that the FO is going to have a plan and will be able to bring in both free agents and draft picks to give the coaching staff the players they need to get the job done

like I said - IF that player is a QB or a kicker, I could care less - most here are not going to like who we pick up as a free agent or as a draft pick based on what has happened in the past, both here and with other teams - I'm looking for these guys to change the way that things have been done here in the past and turn this franchise around and get it done NOW

this is a great opportunity for Snyder to look like a genius if he brings in a great FO staff who make the correct choices for HC and the assistants - we will then have a great situation of NFL guys making decisions and supported by a wealthy owner with an uncapped year in front of us - this is all good in my book
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

Countertrey wrote:In order to believe the article, you must also believe that Shanahan has been running this team since February of '09.

Whatever. :roll:


Who knows if it's true but that article isnt the only one saying that. Chris Mortensen has said that Shanahan has been involved in some capacity for months on 980 a few days ago they reported that Shanahan is already working on putting his staff in place.
Suck and Luck
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

You've got to take someone who #1 fills a need and #2 is a lock to be a starter day 1.


Why?
Suck and Luck
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
Countertrey wrote:In order to believe the article, you must also believe that Shanahan has been running this team since February of '09.

Whatever. :roll:


Who knows if it's true but that article isnt the only one saying that. Chris Mortensen has said that Shanahan has been involved in some capacity for months on 980 a few days ago they reported that Shanahan is already working on putting his staff in place.

And Chris Mortensen probably also thinks that the moon landings were staged.

I won't be surprized to find that there is already a deal in place... but that's a far cry from dictating player moves in February of '09...
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
RayNAustin
Hog
Posts: 2370
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:56 am

Post by RayNAustin »

Maybe Shanny was consulted regarding Cutler ... and that consultation just extended and developed?

Can you not see that as a possibility? We had a bingo caller brought in to call plays ... after that, ANYTHING is possible.
RayNAustin
Hog
Posts: 2370
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:56 am

Post by RayNAustin »

Personally, I'm a bit biased ... and would prefer the Redskins to pick McCoy. The kid is a winner ... he's extremely accurate ... durable .. and very mobile.

This idea that he's two small at 6' 3" is nonsense IMHO. And though he doesn't possess a rocket arm, I'll take accuracy and intelligence over raw strength any day.

Some say he might slip to the late 1st round or even 2nd, and the Skins could swing a deal with their high pick and get two later picks in the 1st round.

I'm far from knowledgeable in the college ranks, but living in Austin, you can't help but see a lot of Longhorn football.

The thing that most impresses me about him is that he had some big shoes to fill here, following Vince Young, and he's done a great job.

He's a smart kid, with some leadership skills, and it ain't easy to be a starter in Austin as a freshman, much less do as well as he did. He had a drop off the following year, but bounced back strong. Of course, his stock could skyrocket or drop like a led balloon depending on what he does against Alabama ... NFL pundits have short memories and are rather fickle.

I don't think he's near a rookie starter, but with a Shannahan type of WC offense installed, he could develop quickly because of his intelligence and accuracy .. the two most important qualities for a WC QB. And with his mobility, he could be an asset as the Redskins retool the 0-line.

He may not be viewed as the prototypical ideal NFL QB, but I think he's got a lot of potential that is being overlooked by the never wrong experts.
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

One thing for sure, we'll know if Snyder is still involved with things here we'll know because if we pick Bradford it will be Snyder's choice :)
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
PulpExposure
Pushing Paper
Pushing Paper
Posts: 4860
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 3:01 pm

Post by PulpExposure »

SkinsJock wrote:One thing for sure, we'll know if Snyder is still involved with things here we'll know because if we pick Bradford it will be Snyder's choice :)


How do we know that? I mean, is it absolutely inconceivable to think that Shanahan will want to pick his own QB to groom?
Gibbs4Life
G4L
G4L
Posts: 2363
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Location: no
Contact:

Post by Gibbs4Life »

I think it stands to reason that Shanahan be given the opportunity to groom a star rookie QB.
HAIL
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Post by VetSkinsFan »

With the sickening offensive line, I don't even think Shanahan will pick a QB with our 4th overall pick unless he's already got things lined up with big Danny moneybags to buy an offensive line.
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
langleyparkjoe
**LPJ**
**LPJ**
Posts: 6714
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
Contact:

Post by langleyparkjoe »

VetSkinsFan wrote:With the sickening offensive line, I don't even think Shanahan will pick a QB with our 4th overall pick unless he's already got things lined up with big Danny moneybags to buy an offensive line.


B-I-N-G-O ! I agree completely, they will buy a new offensive line and maybe later on grab a QB.. muuuuch later. Most likely I'm thinking they'll keep JC & CB at least for one more year. Hey, at least we know JC can take hits behind garbage O-Lines.
Hog Bowl Champions
'09 & '17 langleyparkjoe, '10 Cappster, '11 & '13 DarthMonk,
'12 Deadskins, '14 PickSixerTWSS, '15 APEX PREDATOR, '16 vwoodzpusha
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

I agree Vet - I think we are better off re-building this franchise and trying to get as many quality young players in here as quickly as possible - that, coupled with some free agents would give us a better chance IMO to become a team again :D

Bradford or one of the other 'can't miss', 'flashy', QBs is just another Snyder type move to bring in the glitz at the expense of building a team - I would love to have a Peyton Manning but I think we're better off concentrating on building a team than hoping to get a future HOF QB - whose to say we couldn't find that HOF QB and still build our offensive line

It looks very much like Shanahan is coming in here and I think he aught to evaluate Campbell and see if he can be comfortable with him for a year, maybe bring in a free agent - we need to find a way to get an offense that can score some points here - just adding a QB is limiting the chances to me

I'm just hoping that Snyder brought in Allen and (it looks like he was also planning on) Shanahan to manage this team - I understand that Snyder will have some involvement but I certainly hope that is minimal if at all

Snyder has tried to "buy" success and he has indicated recently that he knows that will not work - we need him to step aside and let these guys manage this team



let it go Snyder - you cannot make things better here - you are a disaster looking for a place to happen
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Locked