So wea are not getting the best OT so ...what now?

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Post Reply
User avatar
Pablo
piglet
Posts: 35
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:04 pm

So wea are not getting the best OT so ...what now?

Post by Pablo »

I believe that we are going to win another game or two so we might be picking top ten but outside the 5th pick. Do we pick the second OT or jump into Spiller Wagon !!!
I believe that if the second OT is good enough to be picked that high we still take him...I am not sure who is that guy yet, but after seeing how much time Donavan Mcnab had yesterday in the pocket to find his recieves .. I think we MUST address the OL though the draft in the first round if talent is there at tackle only, Guards and Centers are easier to plug in from FA or later in the draft..
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

I think that it's really important that we wait to see which Jr's come out and declare. If you are a talented LT, you come out this year.

Keep in mind that there is most likely going to be a rookie salary cap following next years draft and that will factor into a lot of decisions that these young studs have in what they are going to do with their future.
Gibbs4Life
G4L
G4L
Posts: 2363
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Location: no
Contact:

Post by Gibbs4Life »

Spiller Wagon
HAIL
User avatar
fredp45
Hog
Posts: 2157
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2004 10:42 pm

Post by fredp45 »

Why do posters insist in throwing out Spiller's name for our 1st round pick? RB is not a huge need for us! We need OL (a few), LB, CB and FS way more.

I'm not totally sold on Portis being done. With a good line, he becomes a factor again. The guy plays hard. Ganther and Rock are fine as 2nd and 3rd backs. Remember, with Shanahan, you can get a rb in any round? Anyone remember him saying that when he traded Portis...OMG, did anyone realize they'll be reunited?

We need OL. If there isn't a quality OT at our pick, trade down and get an extra pick. I truly want to see at least 5 new OL in camp next year competing for spots. Of those 5 I want to see 2 top picks and a few quality FA's.
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Post by VetSkinsFan »

fredp45 wrote:Why do posters insist in throwing out Spiller's name for our 1st round pick? RB is not a huge need for us! We need OL (a few), LB, CB and FS way more.

I'm not totally sold on Portis being done. With a good line, he becomes a factor again. The guy plays hard. Ganther and Rock are fine as 2nd and 3rd backs. Remember, with Shanahan, you can get a rb in any round? Anyone remember him saying that when he traded Portis...OMG, did anyone realize they'll be reunited?

We need OL. If there isn't a quality OT at our pick, trade down and get an extra pick. I truly want to see at least 5 new OL in camp next year competing for spots. Of those 5 I want to see 2 top picks and a few quality FA's.


We have no home run threat. We have serviceable backs currently (Betts won't be 100% until 2011, and he'll be how old?), but nothing more. We don't have the field general such as Manning/Brees/<cringe> Brady, so we need an above average RB.

We do need to address the line, I agree, but let's be reasonable. We need a RB.
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
User avatar
Skins98
newbie
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:13 am

Post by Skins98 »

Spiller is nothing without a line. Trade down and pick up Trent williams.
User avatar
brad7686
B-rad
B-rad
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:46 am
Location: De La War

Post by brad7686 »

We could easily trade back for a decent OT. Although I have a feeling one or two after Okung will pick up steam, and will be draftable when the skins pick.
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

If there is not a worthy LT at our pick, trade down for picks.

Getting either a RB or QB would be stupid.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
gibbsfan
Joe's#1Fan
Joe's#1Fan
Posts: 1948
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 11:59 am
Location: chocowinity nc

Post by gibbsfan »

anthing to get more picks if our main need isn,t there when the skins come up...
This Ownership Has The Quarantine Virus..
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

I disagree with the idea of trading down. Right now we have the 6th pick overall and we should be able to get a stud player at either qb, OT, rb, cb, etc. You take the best player at a position of need with that pick,
Suck and Luck
Gibbs4Life
G4L
G4L
Posts: 2363
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Location: no
Contact:

Post by Gibbs4Life »

We could take the kid out of Stanford and have Riggins v.2
HAIL
User avatar
fredp45
Hog
Posts: 2157
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2004 10:42 pm

Post by fredp45 »

Let's draft Lachey v2, not Riggins v2..

While I'm not a Shanahan fan, I do know that he'd rather have a good oline, over a rb...he believes any rb can work and I have to agree with him actually!
Gibbs4Life
G4L
G4L
Posts: 2363
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Location: no
Contact:

Post by Gibbs4Life »

Oline.

Offensive Line

OL

Tackle Guard Center Guard Tackle

It doesn't matter ; We have to draft OL

But a top 5 pick is something different , you need a superstar regardless of position , and a superstar capable of bringing wins sometimes single handidly right?
HAIL
Post Reply