Is Cooley's job in Jeopardy....???

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Paralis
Hog
Posts: 250
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:55 am

Post by Paralis »

He's a better blocker, runs better routes, and can catch balls that come in above his numbers?

I don't get the mentality that looks at the Skins, sees one legitimate red zone threat, and says that's enough.

Here's the way I see it. Looking at 2010, for the base offense, you've got Moss and Thomas outside, and Portis in the backfield (he's guaranteed $7M as long as he doesn't retire, so it's a pretty safe bet he's coming back). Line up Cooley at tight end, and that leaves one spot. So you've got either Davis, or any of:

- Randle El;
- Kelly;
- Yoder;
- Sellers.

And that just doesn't seem like a very hard choice to make. As far as roster moves, dump Sellers and Randle El, make Yoder the primary H-back, give Kelly until the end of his rookie contract to show that he can play in the NFL, and don't think about moving anybody under 30 for anything less than an overwhelming offer.
User avatar
MrUbiquitous#26
newbie
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:38 pm

Post by MrUbiquitous#26 »

Gibbs4Life wrote:You don't trade a Pro Bowl TE for just a first rounder, 1 and a 3 at least


I have never seen a probowl TE go for a 1st and probably never will. In fact I have seen probowl TE get cut like McMichael and Crumpler. TE aren't valued that high in the nfl, no matter how good they are.
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

Just to point this out for argument sake - Tony Gonzalez - at the end of his career, was traded to ATL for a 2nd round pick. Just an FYI. I would say that the Redskins would expect similar value if Cooley would be traded. A first is a bit high but I wouldn't be shocked to see a team offer it if they felt that a TE was all they needed.

My vote is to keep Cooley. I would love to see him and Fred on the field the same time.
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

Paralis wrote:He's a better blocker, runs better routes, and can catch balls that come in above his numbers?


- Better blocker? That's debateable. They seem pretty equal.

- Better routes? That comes with experience which Davis is getting.

- Davis caught an amazing TD pass today well above his numbers.


I'm not even ragging on Cooley, like him a lot but he's not heads and shoulders above Davis which is why people are considering trading him.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
HEROHAMO
|||
|||
Posts: 4752
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:34 am
Location: SANTA ANA,CA
Contact:

Post by HEROHAMO »

We either need a new GM or a head coach who heavily influences draft choices. Until then I rather not trade away our prized tight end Cooley.


One game over the Raiders and we all of a sudden are talking about booting Cooley? Get a grip.

We still need a competent Gm, competent head coach and a competent QB!


I am very happy that Davis is turning out to be good. I think we all knew Davis, Thomas and maybe even Kelly has talent.
The question was who will get them the ball?
I still think we need to roll heads in the off season. Until then we should hold on to Cooley and Davis.

Kudos to Davis but still keep this in perspective people. First things first get a GM or Head Coach then lets talk about moves.
Sean Taylor starting free safety Heavens team!

21 Forever

"The show must go on."
DEHog
Diesel
Diesel
Posts: 7425
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:03 pm
Location: FedEx Field
Contact:

Post by DEHog »

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Paralis wrote:Better athlete? maybe. Better football player? no.


There's no room for debate that Davis is the better athelete. He's faster and a lot more nimble than Cooley and breaks tackles just as well. And that's not a knock on Cooley who is a monster.

Now explain how Cooley is a better "player".


I agree Chris Davis is the better athelete but better athelete doesn't + better player...Cooley has better hands and is a better blocker and route runner at this point...but back to the topis...I don't think it's crazy to think about trading him...One of the problems with this org. is that they fall in love with players and hang on to long...better to get rid of a player one year to early than one year to late..
"Sean Taylor is hands down the best athlete I've ever coached it's not even close" Gregg Williams 2005 Mini-Camp
TeeterSalad
09 Champ
09 Champ
Posts: 1262
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:24 pm
Location: Upstate NY

Post by TeeterSalad »

Don't forget that Cooley got plenty of reps at FB also which F. Davis hasn't done. Cooley is also more familar when moved out to a WR position. Cooley has proven himself time and time again and is a leader, Davis has been good for 3 or 4 games. Not to mention all the contributions Cooley makes off the field which helps the team look good. If its me, I don't even consider trading him.

Our offense has had trouble scoring touchdowns right?
Why not help solve the problem by having 2 quality TE's out there near the goal line. I'm not saying theres not other more pressing matters, and TE might not be a high value position to most, but it is a huge position on this offense, and its one of the positions that actually consistently provides good results. Keep Cooley and see what you can do w/ 2 good TE's.
-2009 Hognostications Champion-
-Hognosti-Bowl V Champion-
-Hognosti-Bowl VI Champion-

RIP ST # 21
skinsfan#33
#33
#33
Posts: 4084
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am

Post by skinsfan#33 »

welch wrote:The team does not need Cooley. He is a "nice to have", but he doesn't carry the team.

In fact, Davis looks like a better receiver, more able to get open. Cooley looks more like the guy who slips open when the defense concentrates on the WRs.


I don't agree. Cooley is much more capable of making the high tough catch than Davis is. I do think Davis is a little faster than Cooley, but Davis is still an unknown to other teams. No one is game planning to take him out of games like I have seen them do to Cooley.

Perfect example is that seam pass that should gahve been a >50yard TD to Davis that JC inecplicably missed him on. If that was Cooley, he would have had a DE chip him at the line, a LB bump him in five hards and there would have been safety help over the top. Davis had none of that.

But as defensive coordinators see more tape of hime, don't expect that to continue. Don't get me wrong, they won't shut him down. But he will start getting tripple teamed like Cooley was on certain plays.

However, with Cooley back, a 2 TE set will cause mega problems for defenses. Imagine a single back set, ballanced on both sides. Thomas and Davis on one side with Moss and Cooley on the other. Your showing a strong run formation, but you have enough tallent on the field where the defense would be forced to play a base D. Play action and Cooley and Davis sprinting down the seams and occupying both safeties over and LB under that leaves Moss and Thomas cover one on one. If the safeties don't help the LB's and double Moss and Thomas then you have Cooley being covered by LBs and that is a mis-match.
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
DEHog
Diesel
Diesel
Posts: 7425
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:03 pm
Location: FedEx Field
Contact:

Post by DEHog »

My questions (as it is with alot of decisions with this team) is why did it take an injury to get Davis on the field??
"Sean Taylor is hands down the best athlete I've ever coached it's not even close" Gregg Williams 2005 Mini-Camp
skinsfan#33
#33
#33
Posts: 4084
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am

Post by skinsfan#33 »

DEHog wrote:My questions (as it is with alot of decisions with this team) is why did it take an injury to get Davis on the field??


He was on the field some, not getting the ball. (ask JC about that)
He wasn't on the field as much as he should have been (ask Zorn about that) Maybe, he figured if JC wasn't going to throw him the ball, why have him on the field.
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
DEHog
Diesel
Diesel
Posts: 7425
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:03 pm
Location: FedEx Field
Contact:

Post by DEHog »

skinsfan#33 wrote:
DEHog wrote:My questions (as it is with alot of decisions with this team) is why did it take an injury to get Davis on the field??


He was on the field some, not getting the ball. (ask JC about that)
He wasn't on the field as much as he should have been (ask Zorn about that) Maybe, he figured if JC wasn't going to throw him the ball, why have him on the field.


It's not just Davis...Look how long it took to cut SS...then when they cut him they say it's been a long time coming?? LL move to SS was a long time coming...Randle El is still returning punts??
Why do I think DS and VC are up there saying we're not paying these guy to sit on the bench Jim...they play!!
Everyone been talking about the double TE set...we still haven't seen it??
"Sean Taylor is hands down the best athlete I've ever coached it's not even close" Gregg Williams 2005 Mini-Camp
User avatar
skins2357
Hog
Posts: 665
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 4:25 pm
Location: Columbia MD

Post by skins2357 »

I understand trying to accumulate draft picks, because I agree with that. But I dont think trading Cooley is the right move. I think we could run a successful 2 TE set. I also think Cooley is versitile enough that he could become a full time FB/H Back with Davis playing TE.

There are successful 2 TE sets in the NFL....you just have to use them right. The Cowboys use 2 TE sets alot with Witten and Bennett. That being said they usually leave Witten on the line and move Bennett around, sometimes out wide and sometimes in the slot.

I think we could use Cooley that way, move him around in the backfield (FB) or in the slot or out wide and leave Davis as the TE on the line. You want your best 11 players on the field at the same time and it is the coaches job to figure out how to accomplish that....thats my biggest knock on Zorn.....he cant figure that part out!
Mike/Bruce - If your going to spring big this year in Free Agency, please spring big on offensive lineman! I cant watch Rabach anymore!
User avatar
SKINFAN
Hog
Posts: 1659
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Sterling, Virginia

Post by SKINFAN »

Cooley's job is safe. If anything Fred Davis might get traded. I wonder if he can be converted into a slot reciever.
#21 (36) This IS and will always be the High watermark where all new DB's are measured.


Proverbs 27:17
User avatar
Pablo
piglet
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:04 pm

Post by Pablo »

Cooley will stay here. He is a playemaker and is not a cancer to the team. If that was the case, then maybe the font office would consider it, like the Giants did with Shockley. Cooley is a good player and he makes more yards after the catvh than Fred Davis.. we need both next season and keep them both on the field ...
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

SKINFAN wrote:Cooley's job is safe. If anything Fred Davis might get traded. I wonder if he can be converted into a slot reciever.


I have a feeling that, if both are on the team next year, teams will be seeing a lot of Cooley and Davis in the slot... especially Davis. Don't forget that Davis was a WR when he was a freshman...
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

Yeah. He had issues with his weight so they moved him to TE. Thankfully, he has the size to play the position but something that talks about work ethic, which has been in question several times in the past over the past 2 years on this team.
User avatar
roybus14
Hog
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 12:42 pm
Location: Maryland

Post by roybus14 »

The "Bingo Caller" would find a way to get Davis touches even with Cooley in there. Too bad we won't see it now because Chris is hurt. But what do you expect him (Davis) to do? He's getting his shot and he won the Mackie Award for a reason.

I would take this two-headed monster at TE anyday. As bad as the "Cowgirls" are, especially in December, they were finding ways to use Bennett with Witten. Too bad that they have a "slinger" at QB who is actually some stinky garr-bauge!!!
Sean Taylor - 1983-2007 R.I.P.... Forever A Skin.....
User avatar
SKINFAN
Hog
Posts: 1659
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Sterling, Virginia

Post by SKINFAN »

Pablo wrote:Cooley will stay here. He is a playemaker and is not a cancer to the team. If that was the case, then maybe the font office would consider it, like the Giants did with Shockley. Cooley is a good player and he makes more yards after the catvh than Fred Davis.. we need both next season and keep them both on the field ...


shoot, this brings a whole new meaning to jumbo package.
#21 (36) This IS and will always be the High watermark where all new DB's are measured.


Proverbs 27:17
tribeofjudah
tribe
tribe
Posts: 7075
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:02 pm
Location: SURF CITY, HB, CALI *** Occasionally flying into a SUPERNOVA

Post by tribeofjudah »

TeeterSalad wrote:Don't forget that Cooley got plenty of reps at FB also which F. Davis hasn't done. Cooley is also more familar when moved out to a WR position. Cooley has proven himself time and time again and is a leader, Davis has been good for 3 or 4 games. Not to mention all the contributions Cooley makes off the field which helps the team look good. If its me, I don't even consider trading him.

Our offense has had trouble scoring touchdowns right?
Why not help solve the problem by having 2 quality TE's out there near the goal line. I'm not saying theres not other more pressing matters, and TE might not be a high value position to most, but it is a huge position on this offense, and its one of the positions that actually consistently provides good results. Keep Cooley and see what you can do w/ 2 good TE's.


Let's make Cooley the default (whatever position)...be it WR, TE, FB...etc.

The Coolster can do it....anytime, anywhere....
Proverbs 27:17 As iron sharpens iron,
so one person sharpens another.
User avatar
REDEEMEDSKIN
~~
~~
Posts: 8496
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Post by REDEEMEDSKIN »

frankcal20 wrote:...he has the size to play the position but something that talks about work ethic, which has been in question several times in the past...


After hearing Zorn's presser today, in which he stated that a reason why FD was not performing earlier in the season was because (Í'm paraphrasing) FD wasn't putting in the work to prepare to start due to his being lower on the depth chart than CC, raises a HUGE red flag about FD and the way he deals with adversity.

It seems like he was only willing to prepare when he was told he would start. That's not the type of character winning teams should foster, IMO.

I've witnessed him play extremely well over the past few games (minus the dumb penalty in the end zone), but, I am, TODAY, less inclined to trade Cooley, until FD shows signs of being close to the consumate professional Cooley has shown to be (outside of the penis photo, of course).
Gametime33
piglet
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 9:25 pm
Location: Manassas, VA
Contact:

Post by Gametime33 »

I'm with Luva Luva and believe if we can't move some of the dead weight on our squad (Santana Moss, Randy Thomas, Clinton Portis) by next year perhaps trying to dangle Cooley along with one of these players would yield a 2nd or third rounder.

We need another outside linebacker, a CB that can match D'Angelo Hall's athleticism. Carlos Rogers can't cover my calculus book. Not sure what happened to his attitude since coming back from two devestating knee injuries.

Orakpo has 11 sacks as a rookie. He's been everything you want in your #1 draft pick.

One of the most dynamic pass rushers we have ever had. Better than Manley I think because he is so quick off of the snap.

I love players who work hard and don't think they can turn their game up a notch on Sunday.

You have to give 110% every day.

4-9 with final three games versus two division rivals and one old nemesis.

Norval Eugene Turner hates Snyder to this day for firing him and keeping Charlie Casserly.

Both have been gone for awhile and we still are bottom feeders.

All I want for xmas is no more losing. Pretty please Santa :)
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Post by VetSkinsFan »

I'll keep it simple. Cooley's our best receiver. Period. He's still well within his prime and TEs can perform admirably will in to their mid 30s (yes, the excpetion, but it's not outlandish). To trade Cooley while we have a 6 game window in order to judge the replacement of one of, if not the best TE we've ever had, is DUMB.

Both of these guys can and should be used next year and for years beyond, provided Davis can keep performing at the level he is. We already know what Cooley's capable of.

HTTR
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Re: Is Cooley's job in Jeopardy....???

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

tribeofjudah wrote:With Davis playing better and better....what becomes of Chris Cooley...???

Man, Cooley is one of my FAVS in the whole NFL. I hope we can keep them both.

I don't understand the issue, what would happen to Cooley?
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
skinsfan#33
#33
#33
Posts: 4084
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am

Post by skinsfan#33 »

Gametime33 wrote:dangle Cooley along with one of these players would yield a 2nd or third rounder.

Cooley would be worth at least a first round pick - but even that - the wip lash from the fan base would be just too much!

Gametime33 wrote:Orakpo has 11 sacks as a rookie. He's been everything you want in your #1 draft pick.

One of the most dynamic pass rushers we have ever had. Better than Manley I think because he is so quick off of the snap.


Whao! Slow down there young fellow. If you think Orakpo is better than Manley, then you truly never watched the prize bull play. Orakpo is very good right now, but Dexter was a QB serial killer (TV pun intended).

Gametime33 wrote:Norval Eugene Turner hates Snyder to this day for firing him and keeping Charlie Casserly.


Sorry, wrong order. The Danny sided with Norv and fired Charlie first. (AND later appologized to Casserly telling him he chose the wrong side!)
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
BossHog
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9375
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 8:34 am
Location: London, Ontario
Contact:

Post by BossHog »

Orakpo is definitely no Dexter Manley... yet.

But he sure looks like he could be the next Dexter Manley...

Manley used to scare Redskin fans... let alone the opposition - the guy was just an animal and played with a vigor that has rarely been seen on an NFL field. Do yourself a favor and watch some old videos of him in action. The guy just ate quarterbacks for lunch week in and week out - and the bigger the game - the bigger Dexter got.

But orakpo is such a stud that it isn't hard to see him becoming that same unstoppable force. What a talent.
Sean Taylor was one of a kind, may he rest in peace.
Post Reply