brad7686 wrote:Haven't you learned? Everything is Campbell's fault. According to the hogs.net, there are 11 players on defense and one player on offense. If the team loses, its the qb's fault. Its funny because he played eight times worse than that last week. He had one of the better games he has had all year today, he was clearly one of the best offensive players on the field, and its all his fault. I suppose because of that last TD pass everyone will argue that Romo played well.
You're right, it was one of is best games this year, and that should scare the you-know-what out of you. One of his best games, and NO POINTS.
let me explain why this virtuoso performance looked so good to you .. OK? It's because he looks so bloody poor most of the time that on the rare occurrence that he does make a few difficult 3rd down throws, it's such a shock that people start talking this nonsense like they were in the Washington Post story which was titled "Campbell Shines". WHAT??? How in the world can anyone say that a QB Shines by throwing for 256 yards and Zero TD's and 1 int ? This is just Jason Campbell's version of shining because for him, the bar is that low. But at the end of the day, this "shining" along with $2 will get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks.
No, shining would be better associated with the first year kid Stafford who threw for 422 yards and 5 TD's yesterday. Or Rogers who threw for 344 and 2 TD's. Not Jason Campbell.
Another point that needs to be made here is that contrary to what some believe here ... Jason Campbell is not the only QB in the NFL who has to deal with a pass rush. Rogers, as an example has been sacked 43 times compared to Campbell's 29, yet he's managed to throw 19 TD, 5 ints, and the Packers only average 19 rushing yards per game more than the Redskins. Both he and Campbell were close in draft position, and both have been in the league the same amount of time though Campbell has almost TWICE the game experience Rogers has.
What's the difference between them is this: Rogers is a very good QB that in spite of a leaky o-line, makes plays like an NFL calibre QB. He has pocket presence, can avoid the rush and finds his receivers downfield. And he doesn't throw lame and off the mark balls repeatedly, forcing his receivers to guess where the ball might be delivered on every pass.
Campbell, on the other hand can only find excuses instead of receivers, and misses wide open TD passes even when he does have good pass pro. He is just a very mediocre QB that requires perfect conditions to be moderately successful ... which has been the case ALL ALONG. Even his college career is exactly the same ... he had ONE GOOD season as a senior because he had an all star support cast that didn't need to rely on him to win. He was the beneficiary of that team, not the leader or the reason for their success.
But he's in the right place. Washington DC ... home of the "all talk and no action' crowd. Home of the big promises and no delivery. Were he in Philly or New York, the fans would have booed him into the Atlantic ocean long ago. He wouldn't even be able to come out of the house without body guards.
He's a loser, and since he took over as QB, so have the Redskins, and they will remain losers as long as he's here.
