Official Skins-Eagles GameDay Thread
-
- SCskinsFan
- Posts: 5381
- youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 10:16 am
- Location: Summerville, SC
- Contact:
-
- SCskinsFan
- Posts: 5381
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 10:16 am
- Location: Summerville, SC
- Contact:
-
- Canes Skin
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
- Location: Alexandria, VA
-
- SCskinsFan
- Posts: 5381
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 10:16 am
- Location: Summerville, SC
- Contact:
While you're at it, you can guess that I don't care one bit about what you think of my opinion. Just glad to know that you can be glad about something tonight.Champsturf wrote:Well, I'm guessing that you already know what I think of you opinion. just glad to know that you can see the error of you ways.
Cowboys 7- Redskins 6 (All we needed was 2 minutes of the 60)
Cowboys 17 - Redskins 0 (Way to NOT show up for the 100th anniversary)
----- TWO EASY -----
Cowboys 17 - Redskins 0 (Way to NOT show up for the 100th anniversary)
----- TWO EASY -----
brad7686 wrote:dlc wrote:brad7686 wrote:Sherm is calling better plays IMO
What makes you think that? Less yards than we normally get? Less points? More TOs? What was better?
It doesn't show on the stat sheet, he's just doing smarter things. More screens, bootlegs.
Wow! I didn't see that one bit, and I don't think anyone who doesn't have some anti-Zorn goggles on would make the statement. 10 points? They look as bad as they ever have. We've moved the ball in the past, that's not new. We've gotten a passing TD in a game. Not new. We've done bootleg calls and screens. Not new. I don't get it.
- thedcnative
- Hog
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 7:43 pm
- thedcnative
- Hog
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 7:43 pm
-
- swine
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:17 pm
-
- ~~~
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 3:57 pm
- Location: Ohio
I'm glad that we have a troll wasting our time making stupid posts, admitting to bad opinions, and commenting on his own posts. What a great contribution. Thanks!BeeGee wrote:While you're at it, you can guess that I don't care one bit about what you think of my opinion. Just glad to know that you can be glad about something tonight.Champsturf wrote:Well, I'm guessing that you already know what I think of you opinion. just glad to know that you can see the error of you ways.
You'll always be remembered Sean. R.I.P.
dlc wrote:brad7686 wrote:dlc wrote:brad7686 wrote:Sherm is calling better plays IMO
What makes you think that? Less yards than we normally get? Less points? More TOs? What was better?
It doesn't show on the stat sheet, he's just doing smarter things. More screens, bootlegs.
Wow! I didn't see that one bit, and I don't think anyone who doesn't have some anti-Zorn goggles on would make the statement. 10 points? They look as bad as they ever have. We've moved the ball in the past, that's not new. We've gotten a passing TD in a game. Not new. We've done bootleg calls and screens. Not new. I don't get it.
Are you Zorn's wife? I was just making a statement that IMO Sherm is calling plays that better fit the team.
-
- FanFromAnnapolis
- Posts: 12025
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
- Location: on the bandwagon
- Contact:
CanesSkins26 wrote:brad7686 wrote:dlc wrote:brad7686 wrote:Sherm is calling better plays IMO
What makes you think that? Less yards than we normally get? Less points? More TOs? What was better?
It doesn't show on the stat sheet, he's just doing smarter things. More screens, bootlegs.
Plus, we had Moss wide open for a sure td but JC more some unfathomable reason looked off after pump faking that way and missed him. We also had Thomas open for a td on the 4th down fumble, not Sherm's fault that Rabach can't properly snap a football. That's something a high schooler knows how to do properly.
Exactly. The issue was with execution. When Zorn was calling the plays, I'm sorry to say, we never had that many open opportunities for TDs.
"dlc" should also keep in mind how many of the Eagles' points came off of poor decision making that resulted in turnovers. You can't playcall away that stuff.
-
- swine
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:17 pm
-
- newbie
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:51 pm
- Location: folsom, ca
-
- Canes Skin
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
- Location: Alexandria, VA
brad7686 wrote:dlc wrote:brad7686 wrote:dlc wrote:brad7686 wrote:Sherm is calling better plays IMO
What makes you think that? Less yards than we normally get? Less points? More TOs? What was better?
It doesn't show on the stat sheet, he's just doing smarter things. More screens, bootlegs.
Wow! I didn't see that one bit, and I don't think anyone who doesn't have some anti-Zorn goggles on would make the statement. 10 points? They look as bad as they ever have. We've moved the ball in the past, that's not new. We've gotten a passing TD in a game. Not new. We've done bootleg calls and screens. Not new. I don't get it.
Are you Zorn's wife? I was just making a statement that IMO Sherm is calling plays that better fit the team.
And you're 100 percent right in your assessment.
Suck and Luck
-
- -------
- Posts: 2947
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 2:41 pm
- Location: Lanham, MD
-
- FanFromAnnapolis
- Posts: 12025
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
- Location: on the bandwagon
- Contact:
dlc wrote:brad7686 wrote:dlc wrote:brad7686 wrote:Sherm is calling better plays IMO
What makes you think that? Less yards than we normally get? Less points? More TOs? What was better?
It doesn't show on the stat sheet, he's just doing smarter things. More screens, bootlegs.
Wow! I didn't see that one bit, and I don't think anyone who doesn't have some anti-Zorn goggles on would make the statement. 10 points? They look as bad as they ever have. We've moved the ball in the past, that's not new. We've gotten a passing TD in a game. Not new. We've done bootleg calls and screens. Not new. I don't get it.
Clearly. . .
What's even cooler is all of it got under your skin and into your shallow head. How easy was that?Champsturf wrote:I'm glad that we have a troll wasting our time making stupid posts, admitting to bad opinions, and commenting on his own posts. What a great contribution. Thanks!BeeGee wrote:While you're at it, you can guess that I don't care one bit about what you think of my opinion. Just glad to know that you can be glad about something tonight.Champsturf wrote:Well, I'm guessing that you already know what I think of you opinion. just glad to know that you can see the error of you ways.
Cowboys 7- Redskins 6 (All we needed was 2 minutes of the 60)
Cowboys 17 - Redskins 0 (Way to NOT show up for the 100th anniversary)
----- TWO EASY -----
Cowboys 17 - Redskins 0 (Way to NOT show up for the 100th anniversary)
----- TWO EASY -----
-
- SCskinsFan
- Posts: 5381
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 10:16 am
- Location: Summerville, SC
- Contact:
CanesSkins26 wrote:brad7686 wrote:dlc wrote:brad7686 wrote:Sherm is calling better plays IMO
What makes you think that? Less yards than we normally get? Less points? More TOs? What was better?
It doesn't show on the stat sheet, he's just doing smarter things. More screens, bootlegs.
Plus, we had Moss wide open for a sure td but JC more some unfathomable reason looked off after pump faking that way and missed him. We also had Thomas open for a td on the 4th down fumble, not Sherm's fault that Rabach can't properly snap a football. That's something a high schooler knows how to do properly.
Once again, JC's missed open WRs as well, whether if its his accuracy or he just doesn't see them. Nothing new. I still think that comment that play-calling is much better is a desperate reach hoping that things can get much better with changing plays. It won't. Those who think it's more of a personnel problem need are probably closer to the truth. There is talent, but not as much as many fans thought there was before the season was starting.
- thedcnative
- Hog
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 7:43 pm
-
- the 'mudge
- Posts: 16632
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
- Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine