Brett Favre Stays Retired

Cappster · Post by **Cappster** » Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:19 pm

According to NFL Network, Favre chooses to stay retired. I don't have a link other than hearing it on tv. Goodbye Brett. You were a good quarterback, but I am glad that I no longer have to hear about you coming back (after the initial shock of the "retirement" announcement calms down).

yupchagee · Post by **yupchagee** » Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:41 pm

Who cares?

Jake · Post by **Jake** » Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:44 pm

Good.

ChocolateMilk · Post by **ChocolateMilk** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:06 am

hopefully its for good this time.....

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:50 am

VetSkinsFan · Post by **VetSkinsFan** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:24 am

I'm so freakin tired of hearing <his> name...

langleyparkjoe · Post by **langleyparkjoe** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:03 am

R.I.P.. Retire In Peace!

..finally, GOSH! =D>

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:18 pm

langleyparkjoe wrote:R.I.P.. Retire In Peace!

..finally, GOSH!

Well... for now, anyway...

KazooSkinsFan · Post by **KazooSkinsFan** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:26 pm

He's such a drama queen. Brett, Go Away!

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 3:00 pm

I wanted to see wut AP could do with a true threat at the QB position. Oh well...

VetSkinsFan · Post by **VetSkinsFan** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 3:36 pm

Chris Luva Luva wrote:I wanted to see wut AP could do with a true threat at the QB position. Oh well...

VICK!!!!!

NJ-SKINS-FAN · Post by **NJ-SKINS-FAN** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 3:57 pm

i wont believe he is done until he sits a full year (maybe even then who knows)

would anyone put it past him to get a call at week 10 after a teams QB goes down he wont play....

his fisrts half was good last year, let im have that half in the 2nd half this year for a contender..... i would not be shocked

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:58 pm

VetSkinsFan wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:I wanted to see wut AP could do with a true threat at the QB position. Oh well...

VICK!!!!!

Dude, that would be sick. AP and Vick in the same backfield. LOL If Vick is even 3/4 of the foot threat he was before, it'd be unfair. LMAO. They'd never have to pass the ball. :lol:

Jake · Post by **Jake** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 5:59 pm

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
VetSkinsFan wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:I wanted to see wut AP could do with a true threat at the QB position. Oh well...

VICK!!!!!

Dude, that would be sick. AP and Vick in the same backfield. LOL If Vick is even 3/4 of the foot threat he was before, it'd be unfair. LMAO. They'd never have to pass the ball.

Like they did anyways? :lol:

VetSkinsFan · Post by **VetSkinsFan** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:37 am

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
VetSkinsFan wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:I wanted to see wut AP could do with a true threat at the QB position. Oh well...

VICK!!!!!

Dude, that would be sick. AP and Vick in the same backfield. LOL If Vick is even 3/4 of the foot threat he was before, it'd be unfair. LMAO. They'd never have to pass the ball.

Vick 1k yrd rusher, AP 1k yd rusher...Williams Wall...who needs a passing game?

SKINFAN · Post by **SKINFAN** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:58 am

VetSkinsFan wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
VetSkinsFan wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:I wanted to see wut AP could do with a true threat at the QB position. Oh well...

VICK!!!!!

Dude, that would be sick. AP and Vick in the same backfield. LOL If Vick is even 3/4 of the foot threat he was before, it'd be unfair. LMAO. They'd never have to pass the ball.

Vick 1k yrd rusher, AP 1k yd rusher...Williams Wall...who needs a passing game?

Nah, this will not work! This would mean Vick and AP sharing carries.