SkinsFreak wrote:Deadskins wrote:Jeff Rhodes wrote:>>I agree with the first part, but not the second part of your final sentence.<<
Which part of the second part? Do you agree Redskin fans are knowledgeable but easily stampeded by media that demonize everything Dan Snyder says, or is it the other way around?
I disagreed with your assumption that fans here are "jumping aboard simply because they've been conditioned to do so."
Actually, I completely understand what Jeff Rhodes is saying. He's not saying that every fan here does that, but many jump on the Snyder bash-wagon long before the true facts are disclosed, and it does come off as if they're doing it because they've been conditioned to do so. I mean the Post is bad enough, but at least Dan Steinberg ended his article with... "But I guess we should withhold judgment until we hear exactly why this is happening." Not here. Folks don't understand something, so instead of looking or waiting for the logical answer, they don't understand it so they'll just discredit it altogether and bash away. And this is just another perfect example. These new procedures are actually a good thing, but let's jump to conclusions before we know the whole story so we can bash Snyder once again.(The last past isn't directed at you Deadskins, but just in general.)
People jump to conclusions based on his previous behavior. It'd sort of like cops looking at ex cons 1st when a crime has been committed.