Dan Snyder 3rd Worst Owner in NFL

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Post Reply
Redskin in Canada
~~~~~~
~~~~~~
Posts: 10323
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 9:59 am
Location: Canada

Post by Redskin in Canada »

SkinsFreak wrote:By the way... apologist?

ROTFALMAO Classic. OH MY GOD... a sports fan is actually... I don't know... supporting his team?!?!?!? Oh my God, how unorthodox is that?

Any self-criticism or attempt to identify what has been and IS fundamentally wrong with this team is an act of pessimism and lack of loyalty. So, part of being a fan means to remove any component of REALITY? Sorry, I admit to not understand that definition.

The TRACK RECORD does not matter. The numbers of wins and losses over the last decade mean NOTHING. The standings are a JOKE.

Everything is about WISHING UPON A STAR and DAY DREAMING. Every argument must turn into an APOLOGY or an EXCUSE for past failures. This is a complete irrational distortion that makes you feel good. HOPE can be eternal but reality in life always puts things pack in the place they belong.

You guys need another season of MEDIOCRITY not to be convinced because I do not feel you will ever admit it as a matter of pride and fantasy, but you need another season of mediocrity to have the numbers of fans coming into all boards REPEATING the same criticism against the Front Office made in the past.

This discussion will not go away because it is a VALID and CURRENT affair.
Daniel Snyder has defined incompetence, failure and greed to true Washington Redskins fans for over a decade and a half. Stay away from football operations !!!
Redskin in Canada
~~~~~~
~~~~~~
Posts: 10323
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 9:59 am
Location: Canada

Post by Redskin in Canada »

PulpExposure wrote:
SkinsFreak wrote:
El Mexican wrote:If last years draft serves as an example of what is to come when Vinny is the official GM, then we are in deep trouble.

Save for Horton, the outlook right now is bleak.


Yeah, we're in deeeeeeeep trouble...

ROTFALMAO QFL

Quoted for LAUGHTER!


Ageed, that's a totally laughable post. Surprise surprise; the top 3 picks didn't contribute much last year...well that's because 2 of them were WRs (who normally don't contribute much during year 1, AND both were both injured during training camp and thus, fell way behind) and a TE..who was not going to get significant playing time as a rookie when there's a Pro Bowl TE in front of him.

SKY IS FALLING.

Alaughable post by El Mexican because ...

he is talking about the record of their first season in the team?

Hey Pulp, brother, give El Mexican the benefirt of the doubt at least.

Both of you are entering into an exercise of speculation about three UNPROVEN players. He has one season to show for no contributions whasoever and that is very limited indeed. Although there were rookies in that class who already contributed in their respective teams. But to be fair, you have NONE to show for any good results either.

So, why is the speculation in his post more stupid than the speculation in your post? He could be right and so could you. He has a season to show for and you have none but the story is not over. One or several of these guys -could- still have good careers in the NFL or none. But so far, we have to admit that the contributions of the rookies WRs and TE so far have been NIL.
Daniel Snyder has defined incompetence, failure and greed to true Washington Redskins fans for over a decade and a half. Stay away from football operations !!!
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Post by VetSkinsFan »

I guess it's the short term vs long term. Short term, the haven't contributed much if anything at all. Given that the average NFL career is what, 5 years, that gives them 20% of their career over with. I don't know what odds anyone else likes to gamble with, but I don't bet the farm on a 20% guarantee.

The FO gets slammed for trying to buy a team, and then the FO gets slammed when they don't draft rookie Pro Bowlers. Statistics show that most rookies don't peak in the rookie season. I know that's weird, but it's just the way it is. Give the boys a chance.
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

DEHog wrote:
SkinsFreak wrote:DE, I understand your point and agree to an extent. The coaching turnover in Snyder's early years was difficult. I also believe the team will benefit immensely from stability and continuity, especially at the HC position. I sincerely hope Zorn gets a chance, and in my opinion, that should be longer than two

Thanks...and I couldn't agree more...I want DS to let Zorn coach out his contract. I also think that will be a good time to look at Vinny, while I find it laughable to try and call last year's draft picks a bust...In a league where the average career of a player last less than 4 years I think three years is a fair time frame to judge last year's draft...if they haven't contributed anything buy then the chances of them doing so are greatly reduced. That said I would like to see DS address our FO before he addresses our next HC…Here’s to hoping neither is necessary!

I agree also.
Head Coach - I am not certain that Zorn is a very good HC but I sure hope Snyder has the patience to give Zorn the opportunity to show that he can be. I think (from the blog that 1niksder posted) that we have seen Snyder change from the guy that would have taken the highest profile HC available to selecting a guy that he really thought offered more.

I am cautiously optimistic that we are headed in the right direction - we should find out a lot about this team this season and I hope we see Zorn show that he's got what it takes.

I am not at all sure about Cerrato or Campbell's futures here but I really hope we see Zorn get the chance to show what he's made of.
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

Redskin in Canada wrote:Sorry, I admit to not understand that definition.


That's quite alright, your posts prove unequivocally that there are numerous aspects you fail to understand. :up: :P

Redskin in Canada wrote:Every argument must turn into an APOLOGY


Alright RiC... you want to accuse every team supporter as being an apologist for the owner or the VP, well then, show me one post... from ANY poster, that equates to an apology. Just one...
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

SkinsJock wrote:I am cautiously optimistic


What the...???

DUDE, this is a sport... it's a game... do you not understand that?

YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BE OPTIMISTIC ABOUT ANYTHING... ESPECIALLY IF IT DIRECTLY APPLIES TO A GAME OR A SPORT!

You're just an apologist... Snyder lover...

:lol:
PulpExposure
Pushing Paper
Pushing Paper
Posts: 4860
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 3:01 pm

Post by PulpExposure »

Redskin in Canada wrote:Both of you are entering into an exercise of speculation about three UNPROVEN players. He has one season to show for no contributions whasoever and that is very limited indeed. Although there were rookies in that class who already contributed in their respective teams. But to be fair, you have NONE to show for any good results either.


No, I'm just quoting a well-known and well-demonstrated fact that wide receivers take more than 1 year to acclimate to the NFL. His central thesis is that because the top picks didn't show much last year, they're already going to be NFL busts. In essence, he expected more out of our 2nd round pick WRs than most 1st round WRs show in their first season.

But so far, we have to admit that the contributions of the rookies WRs and TE so far have been NIL.


Sure, and that I completely agree with. But his post doesn't say that; in his post, he's already written off last year's draft class completely. And that is absolutely ridiculous.

Remember he said:

If last years draft serves as an example of what is to come when Vinny is the official GM, then we are in deep trouble.

Save for Horton, the outlook right now is bleak.


Again, Sky is Falling. NO patience whatsoever.
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

I do not think that Snyder should be rated that low and I do think that Snyder has changed somewhat and I am hopeful. HOWEVER, the fact remains that the team has not done very well under Snyder's ownership and we have not been managed well nor do we seem to have a plan for the future.

We are constantly hoping that things will get turned around here but we are like a chef that keeps adding spices to a bad recipe in hopes that it will change and become tasteful :roll:

We are now still in the "let's give this a try" or "let's give these guys a chance" mode, when we should be futher down the rebuilding road than we are.

This is not because the QB is not good enough or the coach is not good enough - the one constant is, we do not make good enough decisions at the top to ensure continued success here.

If you want a first class team then you aught to find the right people to manage it and give them the support to get that done.
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
DEHog
Diesel
Diesel
Posts: 7425
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:03 pm
Location: FedEx Field
Contact:

Post by DEHog »

a•pol•o•gist
A person who argues in defense or justification of something, such as a doctrine, policy, or institution.
"Sean Taylor is hands down the best athlete I've ever coached it's not even close" Gregg Williams 2005 Mini-Camp
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

yupchagee wrote:
SkinsFreak wrote:
yupchagee wrote:In 2 TE sets, the 2nd TE is usually a blocker, which Davis isn't. While it's nice to have depth, you don't use a 2nd rnd pick on a player you don't see as starting in a couple of years.


Making a comment such as the one I highlighted proves beyond any reasonable doubt that you don't follow the team very closely and have no idea of what you're talking about. Because if you think they don't plan on using him for a couple of years... I mean... that's just ignorant. Davis will be playing this year.

It's rather evident you aren't following the team or listening to Zorn. Zorn has spoken numerous times about formations utilizing multiple pass catching TE's. As I said before, he spoke about it again this past weekend. In some formations he might split one out or could use them both on the end of the line. Perhaps you should give the coach the benefit of the doubt and watch his offense in it's second year before you condemn it. I'm quite sure Zorn knows what he's doing and what he intends, while those who don't follow very closely have no idea.

I'm not going to waste my time to pull up every recent quote from Zorn regarding the use of Davis, but here's a few...

Question: How is Fred Davis growing and maturing as a tight end? Can we expect contributions from him this year?

-- Steve W.

Gary: The goal has always been to get Davis and Chris Cooley on the field at the same time. This year, that’s coming closer to fruition as Davis is progressing nicely. Said Jim Zorn: “Now he is looking forward to stepping into a role and actually playing. Last year, he was wondering what it was all about. He kind of grew up to know that to be on the football field, you have to do things right and you have to play fast...He is just more comfortable. He knows the terminology now. When I call a particular play, he knows what that means to him now.”


In just a few short practices this offseason, Davis appears (to me) have completely turned things around. He's looked fast and athletic in practices, and he's appeared focused while working. But today -- for the third or fourth straight day -- I was struck by Davis's footspeed after the catch. He's a big guy, but is remarkably quick.

I talked to Davis about minicamp and the first week of OTAs, but first I talked to head coach Jim Zorn about if he had seen the same differences in Davis that I had.

"Oh, he's very different than last year when he came in," Zorn said. "More explosive. He looked powerful, caught the ball well."

"He's much more confident, and he knows we want him to be on that field -- and that's what he's getting ready for. He's not just trying to make the team, you know."


I didn't say play, I said START


As long as Cooley is healthy, Davis will not start. It was a bad use of the pick.


How do you know? And if Davis is involved in 50%+ of the game, what difference does it make if he's not on the field for the 1st play of the game, which he might be? The TE position is not like others, in that multiple TE's are used during the course of the game. Further, Davis was a 2nd round pick. You act like he was a top ten 1st rounder. But whatever... it's apparent the coaches own words regarding his intentions with certain players isn't good enough for you. I'll remember this discussion and we'll talk after the season.
DEHog
Diesel
Diesel
Posts: 7425
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:03 pm
Location: FedEx Field
Contact:

Post by DEHog »

In essence, he expected more out of our 2nd round pick WRs than most 1st round WRs show in their first season.


Further, Davis was a 2nd round pick. You act like he was a top ten 1st rounder


Wasn't it just a year ago we (those of us who were puzzled by the selections of a second WR and a TE) were told how the Skins got the best player available and there were all projected as first rounder’s
"Sean Taylor is hands down the best athlete I've ever coached it's not even close" Gregg Williams 2005 Mini-Camp
Redskin in Canada
~~~~~~
~~~~~~
Posts: 10323
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 9:59 am
Location: Canada

Post by Redskin in Canada »

SkinsJock wrote:I do not think that Snyder should be rated that low and I do think that Snyder has changed somewhat and I am hopeful. HOWEVER, the fact remains that the team has not done very well under Snyder's ownership and we have not been managed well nor do we seem to have a plan for the future.

We are constantly hoping that things will get turned around here but we are like a chef that keeps adding spices to a bad recipe in hopes that it will change and become tasteful :roll:

We are now still in the "let's give this a try" or "let's give these guys a chance" mode, when we should be futher down the rebuilding road than we are.

This is not because the QB is not good enough or the coach is not good enough - the one constant is, we do not make good enough decisions at the top to ensure continued success here.

If you want a first class team then you aught to find the right people to manage it and give them the support to get that done.

This is in ESSENCE the point of view shared completely by most of us on the unapologetic side of the argument.

But even a criticism with this sensible hindsight and measure is unwelcome by some like Freak who have more a vocation for a cheerleader than a serious analyst of the TRACK RECORD of this team.

The camps are divided very clearly among those who can separate the love for their team and the bad mangement conducted by the FO over a decade and those others who cannot separate their loyalty for the team from an endless support for a dysfunctional front office.

I do not argue that some are better fans than others or some love their team more than others. Both have arguments to show that they are good fans. Some will argue that they are fans in spite of such a horrendous FO. Others willl say that they are fans even with support or mixed feelings. No matter. We all are fans. The thing that divides us deeply is whether there is an element of trust that can be deposited on the FO after such a disastrous or mediocre track record or not.

We argue in the negative with the TRACK RECORD on our side. But I understand the emotional motvation for eternal hope and optimism of some of you as unjustified as that might be on our eyes.
Daniel Snyder has defined incompetence, failure and greed to true Washington Redskins fans for over a decade and a half. Stay away from football operations !!!
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

Redskin in Canada wrote:The camps are divided very clearly among those who can separate the love for their team and the bad mangement conducted by the FO over a decade and those others who cannot separate their loyalty for the team from an endless support for a dysfunctional front office.

I do not argue that some are better fans than others or some love their team more than others. Both have arguments to show that they are good fans. Some will argue that they are fans in spite of such a horrendous FO. Others willl say that they are fans even with support or mixed feelings. No matter. We all are fans. The thing that divides us deeply is whether there is an element of trust that can be deposited on the FO after such a disastrous or mediocre track record or not.
We argue in the negative with the TRACK RECORD on our side. But I understand the emotional motvation for eternal hope and optimism of some of you as unjustified as that might be on our eyes.


thanks RiC!

I am looking forward to the season just like I have since I became a fan of this team in 1972, just after I arrived from Australia and lived in Annapolis. I was very fortunate to have some friends that could take me to see the games at RFK and even luckier in that we got to watch the games from a box next to the owner's box and right under the upper deck - great seats, that place used to rock.

I was initially excited that Snyder (as a fan) became our owner but I have grown frustrated at the lack of real progress with the way he has managed our team.
We deserve better and while I will be just as hopeful as the next guy that things improve here, I have come to agree with you that we need to get rid of Cerrato - a part of me would love for some of his recent additions to really work out here but the reality of how this team has done with Snyder and Cerrato is just not good - therein lies a problem - the only way that we get rid of Cerrato is to have the recent picks and acquisitions not work out, putting us even further behind in the process of rebuilding this team.


So now I have to hope that these 2 bozos can get things turned around despite the evidence to the contrary - see the difference here is that we hope that things will be better this year while more than half of the NFL is confident that things will be better for their team this year than last year.

I may not make opening day this year but I will be watching every game and hoping for the best
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
User avatar
SnyderSucks
Hog
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:56 pm
Location: Colorado

Post by SnyderSucks »

I agree that Washington had bigger holes last year than TE, but the potential of the two TE set is astounding. Most teams don't have a player capable of guarding Cooley. I doubt many at all have two players capable of guarding Cooley and Davis. Imagine the mismatches.

In a Two TE, Two WR, 1 RB set. You can pass out of this with four receivers in the pattern plus Portis out of the backfield. That leaves a safety on one TE, and a LB on the other, with an LB on Portis. The two WR's are also single covered with one safety deep. Get it to Moss with just the safety to beat. If the defense goes nickel against it, you run out of it with 7 men on the offensive line. In nickel, they've only got 6 line/LB in the game, so the RB should be in the secondary with a blocker against a corner or a safety. It's a nightmare for the defense, with tons of options for the offense. I really hope Davis can step it up and this becomes a primary formation.
With the Cardinals reaching the Super Bowl, is Dan Snyder officially the worst owner in the league?
HEROHAMO
|||
|||
Posts: 4752
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:34 am
Location: SANTA ANA,CA
Contact:

Post by HEROHAMO »

Snyder could actually be considered the worst if you consider the track records. The Lions Ownership is the only worthy competitor as far as being the worst. The Lions Ownership has actually had its team in the NFC Championship in 1991.

Al Davis has 3 SuperBowl Rings. Numerous Hall of famers. Numerous AFC Championship appearances. He was considered a genius in his younger days. What is Snyders excuse?

Even if you only count the years Snyder has owned the team vs the Raider and Lions. Al Davis had his Raiders appear in two AFC championships and One SuperBowl.

The Lions on the other hand have had one of the worst GMS in that span. Matt Millen was a horrible GM. The Lions have also managed to be the only 0-16 team in history.

So the worst two owners are either The Lions owner or Snyder. Al Davis is an old man already. You cannot really blame him. He is a stubborn old school guy.
Sean Taylor starting free safety Heavens team!

21 Forever

"The show must go on."
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

SkinsFreak wrote:
yupchagee wrote:
SkinsFreak wrote:
yupchagee wrote:In 2 TE sets, the 2nd TE is usually a blocker, which Davis isn't. While it's nice to have depth, you don't use a 2nd rnd pick on a player you don't see as starting in a couple of years.


Making a comment such as the one I highlighted proves beyond any reasonable doubt that you don't follow the team very closely and have no idea of what you're talking about. Because if you think they don't plan on using him for a couple of years... I mean... that's just ignorant. Davis will be playing this year.

It's rather evident you aren't following the team or listening to Zorn. Zorn has spoken numerous times about formations utilizing multiple pass catching TE's. As I said before, he spoke about it again this past weekend. In some formations he might split one out or could use them both on the end of the line. Perhaps you should give the coach the benefit of the doubt and watch his offense in it's second year before you condemn it. I'm quite sure Zorn knows what he's doing and what he intends, while those who don't follow very closely have no idea.

I'm not going to waste my time to pull up every recent quote from Zorn regarding the use of Davis, but here's a few...

Question: How is Fred Davis growing and maturing as a tight end? Can we expect contributions from him this year?

-- Steve W.

Gary: The goal has always been to get Davis and Chris Cooley on the field at the same time. This year, that’s coming closer to fruition as Davis is progressing nicely. Said Jim Zorn: “Now he is looking forward to stepping into a role and actually playing. Last year, he was wondering what it was all about. He kind of grew up to know that to be on the football field, you have to do things right and you have to play fast...He is just more comfortable. He knows the terminology now. When I call a particular play, he knows what that means to him now.”


In just a few short practices this offseason, Davis appears (to me) have completely turned things around. He's looked fast and athletic in practices, and he's appeared focused while working. But today -- for the third or fourth straight day -- I was struck by Davis's footspeed after the catch. He's a big guy, but is remarkably quick.

I talked to Davis about minicamp and the first week of OTAs, but first I talked to head coach Jim Zorn about if he had seen the same differences in Davis that I had.

"Oh, he's very different than last year when he came in," Zorn said. "More explosive. He looked powerful, caught the ball well."

"He's much more confident, and he knows we want him to be on that field -- and that's what he's getting ready for. He's not just trying to make the team, you know."


I didn't say play, I said START


As long as Cooley is healthy, Davis will not start. It was a bad use of the pick.


How do you know? And if Davis is involved in 50%+ of the game, what difference does it make if he's not on the field for the 1st play of the game, which he might be? The TE position is not like others, in that multiple TE's are used during the course of the game. Further, Davis was a 2nd round pick. You act like he was a top ten 1st rounder. But whatever... it's apparent the coaches own words regarding his intentions with certain players isn't good enough for you. I'll remember this discussion and we'll talk after the season.


I know he was a 2nd rnd pick. I'm just saying that you don't use a pick that high on someone who is likely to be a backup for a number of years. How many teams routinely use 2 receiving TE's anywhere close to 1/2 the time? Do any of them use the WCO?
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
El Mexican
Hog
Posts: 1061
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:57 am

Post by El Mexican »

I could care less what Zorn or Cerrato say to the media about such or such player contribuiting more than last year.

What are they supposed to say?! That the team will use him even less?!

All these young players (Davis, Kelly, Thomas) were HIGH draft picks. I expected more of them, really, considering they have not even showed potential during gametime. They barely played last year and that, to me, is absurd. Throw 'em in during critical moments of the game to see what you got in your investment. Baptism by fire, if you will.

Until they start being al least servicable, I'll define them under the category of "picks that could have used better".

This has happened before, you know: see Howard, Westbrook, Gardner, and Taylor Jacobs. (And yes, I know, they were not drafted under the Zorn era).
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

How many teams routinely use 2 receiving TE's anywhere close to 1/2 the time? Do any of them use the WCO?


And, how many times have you seen a TE used in an attempt to run a reverse? Despite the fact that that particular play collapsed, that should tell you something about how Zorn sees Davis... and it's not as a typical TE...
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

I haven't been following this thread too closely but if anyone deserves blame for the rookies of 08 its Zorn, not Danny. Although if you want to argue the root of the issue....lololo
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
User avatar
SnyderSucks
Hog
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:56 pm
Location: Colorado

Post by SnyderSucks »

Chris Luva Luva wrote:I haven't been following this thread too closely but if anyone deserves blame for the rookies of 08 its Zorn, not Danny. Although if you want to argue the root of the issue....lololo


Zorn certainly had some issues adjusting to being head coach, but not sure how the problems with the rookie class were his fault? Did he secretly take a crowbar to the knees of his rookie wide receivers? Should he have been driving to Davis's house each morning to wake him up and each evening to make sure he was studying the playbook? Was he the one who ensured that the WR corp would be Moss, Randle El, two rookies, and a guy who plays hard but is definitely on the downside?
With the Cardinals reaching the Super Bowl, is Dan Snyder officially the worst owner in the league?
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

Chris Luva Luva wrote:I haven't been following this thread too closely but if anyone deserves blame for the rookies of 08 its Zorn, not Danny. Although if you want to argue the root of the issue....lololo

You can't blame Zorn for the rookies. Maybe for them not getting much game time, but not for them being on the team.

P.S. Chris, I've always wanted to know, what does the extra "olo" stand for?
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

yupchagee wrote:How many teams routinely use 2 receiving TE's anywhere close to 1/2 the time? Do any of them use the WCO?


Well... just to name a few... the Patriots, Cowboys, Colts, 49ers...

First of all, the TE is being used far more frequently. In 2002, there were 1607 receptions by tight ends in the NFL, producing 16812 receiving yards and 128 touchdowns. In 2007 there were 2069 receptions, 21896 yards and 183 touchdowns. That is a difference of 462 receptions, 5084 yards and 63 touchdowns. In fact, from 2002 (the earliest stats I could easily get a hold of) receptions have increased nearly every year, the lone exception being 2005 when there were 15 more receptions than 2006. Receiving yards for tight ends have increased every year, and touchdowns, although not as linear as the rest, are on the whole increasing every year.

Year --- Receptions - Receiving Yards - Touchdowns
2007 ------ 2069 ---------- 21896 ---------- 183
2006 ------ 1897 ---------- 20143 ---------- 156
2005 ------ 1912 ---------- 20006 ---------- 140
2004 ------ 1844 ---------- 19404 ---------- 182
2003 ------ 1691 ---------- 17756 ---------- 126
2002 ------ 1607 ---------- 16812 ---------- 128

Double-barreled

The new prototype tight end has become so effective in the passing game that many teams are using two at a time.


WHILE TERRELL OWENS'S signing caused the biggest off-season stir in Dallas, it wasn't the Cowboys' only intriguing personnel move. In April, they drafted Notre Dame tight end Anthony Fasano in the second round-despite having a 24-year-old, two-time Pro Bowl player, Jason Witten, already manning the position. Far from a challenge to Witten, who averaged 63 receptions over his first three seasons, Fasano's drafting signaled a change in coach Bill Parcells's playbook. This year the Cowboys are joining roughly one third of NFL teams in employing two tight ends in their base offenses.

The alignment was in vogue in the 1990s, before three-receiver sets and spread formations became the offensive craze. But as defenses adjusted to that aerial attack, the two-tight-end set returned, with a twist: Increased athleticism at the position makes the alignment a more formidable weapon than before. "This hybrid position is not a traditional tight end," says Parcells, who is using Witten (6'5'', 265 pounds) and Fasano (6'4'', 258) together on about 80% of plays. "If you put just another slug tight end in there, an immovable guy, you're not creating an advantage."

The reemergence of the two-tight-end alignment can be attributed to 1) the versatility of the faster, stronger athletes playing the position; 2) the proliferation of 3-4 defenses, which are prone to having linebackers cover tight ends; and 3) the rise of the Cover 2 scheme, which is susceptible to mid-range passes underneath the safeties-the tight end's bread and butter. Parcells prefers using a second tight end over a third wideout because he wants a tight end going against a smaller safety or, better yet, a slower linebacker, rather than a wideout against a nickelback. Even in long-yardage situations Dallas and other teams are using an extra tight end to create mismatches. "Unless you have a third wide receiver who is just so superior to the other team's additional defensive back," says Parcells, "another good tight end gives you an advantage in the matchups."

The two-tight-end formation has been part of the Colts offense since coordinator Tom Moore and quarterback Peyton Manning arrived in 1998. Now, with a trio of versatile tight ends in Dallas Clark (6'3", 252), Ben Utecht (6'6", 251) and Bryan Fletcher (6'5", 230) Indy uses the formation almost exclusively. Says Colts president Bill Polian, "When you flex out the athletic tight end, you put the defense in a bind: Does it come with a nickelback, who can be overpowered or blocked [on a run], or does it leave a linebacker on the field, which is really a disadvantage [in coverage]?"

In San Francisco the 49ers had a prize tight end in Eric Johnson (6'3", 252), who had a team-high 82 catches for 825 yards in 2004 but missed last season with a torn right plantar fascia, and this year they drafted the highly athletic Vernon Davis (6'3", 253) in April. But instead of pitting the two against each other in a competition for the starting job, offensive coordinator Norv Turner is using them in tandem on roughly half of San Francisco's snaps.

The Patriots, having lost wideouts Deion Branch and David Givens, now feature two first-round tight ends in their passing game: Daniel Graham, a superb blocker who's dangerous in the open field, and Ben Watson, a solid blocker and receiver who has sub-4.5 speed. "Because they've got guys who've been in the system," says Witten, " New England is probably the team that executes [the two-tight-end offense] the best."

Of course, it helps all teams that colleges are developing tight ends that fit the new prototype. "The college game is so much more pass-oriented than it ever was," says Parcells. "I would say it's a trend, but it's also the only cars they're selling these days."


Link

Just because you don't understand or recognize something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. By the way, I'll send you an invoice for the education. :wink:
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

SkinsFreak wrote:
yupchagee wrote:How many teams routinely use 2 receiving TE's anywhere close to 1/2 the time? Do any of them use the WCO?


Well... just to name a few... the Patriots, Cowboys, Colts, 49ers...

First of all, the TE is being used far more frequently. In 2002, there were 1607 receptions by tight ends in the NFL, producing 16812 receiving yards and 128 touchdowns. In 2007 there were 2069 receptions, 21896 yards and 183 touchdowns. That is a difference of 462 receptions, 5084 yards and 63 touchdowns. In fact, from 2002 (the earliest stats I could easily get a hold of) receptions have increased nearly every year, the lone exception being 2005 when there were 15 more receptions than 2006. Receiving yards for tight ends have increased every year, and touchdowns, although not as linear as the rest, are on the whole increasing every year.

Year --- Receptions - Receiving Yards - Touchdowns
2007 ------ 2069 ---------- 21896 ---------- 183
2006 ------ 1897 ---------- 20143 ---------- 156
2005 ------ 1912 ---------- 20006 ---------- 140
2004 ------ 1844 ---------- 19404 ---------- 182
2003 ------ 1691 ---------- 17756 ---------- 126
2002 ------ 1607 ---------- 16812 ---------- 128

Double-barreled

The new prototype tight end has become so effective in the passing game that many teams are using two at a time.


WHILE TERRELL OWENS'S signing caused the biggest off-season stir in Dallas, it wasn't the Cowboys' only intriguing personnel move. In April, they drafted Notre Dame tight end Anthony Fasano in the second round-despite having a 24-year-old, two-time Pro Bowl player, Jason Witten, already manning the position. Far from a challenge to Witten, who averaged 63 receptions over his first three seasons, Fasano's drafting signaled a change in coach Bill Parcells's playbook. This year the Cowboys are joining roughly one third of NFL teams in employing two tight ends in their base offenses.

The alignment was in vogue in the 1990s, before three-receiver sets and spread formations became the offensive craze. But as defenses adjusted to that aerial attack, the two-tight-end set returned, with a twist: Increased athleticism at the position makes the alignment a more formidable weapon than before. "This hybrid position is not a traditional tight end," says Parcells, who is using Witten (6'5'', 265 pounds) and Fasano (6'4'', 258) together on about 80% of plays. "If you put just another slug tight end in there, an immovable guy, you're not creating an advantage."

The reemergence of the two-tight-end alignment can be attributed to 1) the versatility of the faster, stronger athletes playing the position; 2) the proliferation of 3-4 defenses, which are prone to having linebackers cover tight ends; and 3) the rise of the Cover 2 scheme, which is susceptible to mid-range passes underneath the safeties-the tight end's bread and butter. Parcells prefers using a second tight end over a third wideout because he wants a tight end going against a smaller safety or, better yet, a slower linebacker, rather than a wideout against a nickelback. Even in long-yardage situations Dallas and other teams are using an extra tight end to create mismatches. "Unless you have a third wide receiver who is just so superior to the other team's additional defensive back," says Parcells, "another good tight end gives you an advantage in the matchups."

The two-tight-end formation has been part of the Colts offense since coordinator Tom Moore and quarterback Peyton Manning arrived in 1998. Now, with a trio of versatile tight ends in Dallas Clark (6'3", 252), Ben Utecht (6'6", 251) and Bryan Fletcher (6'5", 230) Indy uses the formation almost exclusively. Says Colts president Bill Polian, "When you flex out the athletic tight end, you put the defense in a bind: Does it come with a nickelback, who can be overpowered or blocked [on a run], or does it leave a linebacker on the field, which is really a disadvantage [in coverage]?"

In San Francisco the 49ers had a prize tight end in Eric Johnson (6'3", 252), who had a team-high 82 catches for 825 yards in 2004 but missed last season with a torn right plantar fascia, and this year they drafted the highly athletic Vernon Davis (6'3", 253) in April. But instead of pitting the two against each other in a competition for the starting job, offensive coordinator Norv Turner is using them in tandem on roughly half of San Francisco's snaps.

The Patriots, having lost wideouts Deion Branch and David Givens, now feature two first-round tight ends in their passing game: Daniel Graham, a superb blocker who's dangerous in the open field, and Ben Watson, a solid blocker and receiver who has sub-4.5 speed. "Because they've got guys who've been in the system," says Witten, " New England is probably the team that executes [the two-tight-end offense] the best."

Of course, it helps all teams that colleges are developing tight ends that fit the new prototype. "The college game is so much more pass-oriented than it ever was," says Parcells. "I would say it's a trend, but it's also the only cars they're selling these days."


Link

Just because you don't understand or recognize something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. By the way, I'll send you an invoice for the education. :wink:

Good stuff, SF.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

SkinsFreak wrote:
yupchagee wrote:How many teams routinely use 2 receiving TE's anywhere close to 1/2 the time? Do any of them use the WCO?


Well... just to name a few... the Patriots, Cowboys, Colts, 49ers...

First of all, the TE is being used far more frequently. In 2002, there were 1607 receptions by tight ends in the NFL, producing 16812 receiving yards and 128 touchdowns. In 2007 there were 2069 receptions, 21896 yards and 183 touchdowns. That is a difference of 462 receptions, 5084 yards and 63 touchdowns. In fact, from 2002 (the earliest stats I could easily get a hold of) receptions have increased nearly every year, the lone exception being 2005 when there were 15 more receptions than 2006. Receiving yards for tight ends have increased every year, and touchdowns, although not as linear as the rest, are on the whole increasing every year.

Year --- Receptions - Receiving Yards - Touchdowns
2007 ------ 2069 ---------- 21896 ---------- 183
2006 ------ 1897 ---------- 20143 ---------- 156
2005 ------ 1912 ---------- 20006 ---------- 140
2004 ------ 1844 ---------- 19404 ---------- 182
2003 ------ 1691 ---------- 17756 ---------- 126
2002 ------ 1607 ---------- 16812 ---------- 128

Double-barreled

The new prototype tight end has become so effective in the passing game that many teams are using two at a time.


WHILE TERRELL OWENS'S signing caused the biggest off-season stir in Dallas, it wasn't the Cowboys' only intriguing personnel move. In April, they drafted Notre Dame tight end Anthony Fasano in the second round-despite having a 24-year-old, two-time Pro Bowl player, Jason Witten, already manning the position. Far from a challenge to Witten, who averaged 63 receptions over his first three seasons, Fasano's drafting signaled a change in coach Bill Parcells's playbook. This year the Cowboys are joining roughly one third of NFL teams in employing two tight ends in their base offenses.

The alignment was in vogue in the 1990s, before three-receiver sets and spread formations became the offensive craze. But as defenses adjusted to that aerial attack, the two-tight-end set returned, with a twist: Increased athleticism at the position makes the alignment a more formidable weapon than before. "This hybrid position is not a traditional tight end," says Parcells, who is using Witten (6'5'', 265 pounds) and Fasano (6'4'', 258) together on about 80% of plays. "If you put just another slug tight end in there, an immovable guy, you're not creating an advantage."

The reemergence of the two-tight-end alignment can be attributed to 1) the versatility of the faster, stronger athletes playing the position; 2) the proliferation of 3-4 defenses, which are prone to having linebackers cover tight ends; and 3) the rise of the Cover 2 scheme, which is susceptible to mid-range passes underneath the safeties-the tight end's bread and butter. Parcells prefers using a second tight end over a third wideout because he wants a tight end going against a smaller safety or, better yet, a slower linebacker, rather than a wideout against a nickelback. Even in long-yardage situations Dallas and other teams are using an extra tight end to create mismatches. "Unless you have a third wide receiver who is just so superior to the other team's additional defensive back," says Parcells, "another good tight end gives you an advantage in the matchups."

The two-tight-end formation has been part of the Colts offense since coordinator Tom Moore and quarterback Peyton Manning arrived in 1998. Now, with a trio of versatile tight ends in Dallas Clark (6'3", 252), Ben Utecht (6'6", 251) and Bryan Fletcher (6'5", 230) Indy uses the formation almost exclusively. Says Colts president Bill Polian, "When you flex out the athletic tight end, you put the defense in a bind: Does it come with a nickelback, who can be overpowered or blocked [on a run], or does it leave a linebacker on the field, which is really a disadvantage [in coverage]?"

In San Francisco the 49ers had a prize tight end in Eric Johnson (6'3", 252), who had a team-high 82 catches for 825 yards in 2004 but missed last season with a torn right plantar fascia, and this year they drafted the highly athletic Vernon Davis (6'3", 253) in April. But instead of pitting the two against each other in a competition for the starting job, offensive coordinator Norv Turner is using them in tandem on roughly half of San Francisco's snaps.

The Patriots, having lost wideouts Deion Branch and David Givens, now feature two first-round tight ends in their passing game: Daniel Graham, a superb blocker who's dangerous in the open field, and Ben Watson, a solid blocker and receiver who has sub-4.5 speed. "Because they've got guys who've been in the system," says Witten, " New England is probably the team that executes [the two-tight-end offense] the best."

Of course, it helps all teams that colleges are developing tight ends that fit the new prototype. "The college game is so much more pass-oriented than it ever was," says Parcells. "I would say it's a trend, but it's also the only cars they're selling these days."


Link

Just because you don't understand or recognize something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. By the way, I'll send you an invoice for the education. :wink:


Last yr 2 teams (Chi & NO) had 2 TE's with at least 40 receptions.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

Deadskins wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:I haven't been following this thread too closely but if anyone deserves blame for the rookies of 08 its Zorn, not Danny. Although if you want to argue the root of the issue....lololo

You can't blame Zorn for the rookies. Maybe for them not getting much game time, but not for them being on the team.

P.S. Chris, I've always wanted to know, what does the extra "olo" stand for?


Nothing, its just lolololol. And yea, I blame him for them not being on the field or not finding ways to use them.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
Post Reply