frankcal20 wrote:markshark84 wrote:JC absolutely wanted a trade (the "no comment" was obvious enough -- it's like pleading the 5th in court).....and why wouldn't he? He considers himself an NFL starting QB. Now the real question is do other teams? Neither the Jets nor the Broncos wanted him (the Broncos went as far as to take a 17th and Orton over our 13th and Campbell) , but that doesn't mean that other teams would like to pick him up. I personally can only think of a couple, but that's not to say it isn't possible.
In relation to Culter, the fact is that JC wasn't as aggressive towards a trade -- which I personally attribute to his personality more than anything else. His reaction is very much like the way he plays -- not very aggressive or outspoken --- one of his major problems as a QB. To me (and I say to me), it looked as if he was not confident enough to go out to the media, express his worth and say that the front office is crazy for looking into replacing him. I would rather him have been outspoken and stood his ground via the media -- shown some fire. At least then he would have spoke up. All in all, it is just another example that while JC is a stand-up guy and well liked, he isn't assertive.
We'll see how he does this year as QB. This, hopefully, is the year of no excuses. He has been awarded every excuse under the sun for the fact that he hasn't panned out as a solid starter or franchise QB. Some are legit, most aren't but regardless this is his contract year and a make or break one for JC. We'll see if he responds with the fire that we have been so hoping for since 2005.
While I was against trading up for Sanchez, I wouldn't mind seeing a trade for Brady as long as it doesn't include trading away a pick above the 4th round. But the question still remains: would the Browns follow in the footsteps of the Broncos and Jets and take a pass on JC? My answer is probably.
For all you Mod's out there, I am attacking the post, not the poster. Hence, following the rules......
This is the dumbest post I have read in all my years on here (except one kid who couldn't type, spell or use any punctuation properly...we all remember him, not by name, but poor grammar).
Jim Zorn said all year that the philosophy of last year was to "Stay Even." Jason, along with the rest of the team did that. Was there time when he showed a reaction, yes. I saw just on tv today on NFL Network where he threw a td pass and he was jumping in C. Samuels arms, pumping his fists in celebration. There was another play where he was taken down and he chewed out a lineman. Not sure who it was, just assuming it was a backup during one of our many injury plagued games.
Is he Peyton Manning, Phillip Rivers, any of those guys? No. Not by a long shot. But he is what he is. An even keeled QB who has extreme talent. When given the opportunity to flourish under the same system, we will see what he can do. That is why Joe Gibbs and staff reached up in the 1st round to get him. I think that the Redskins organization has stunted his growth based on the fact that he has been asked to learn so many offenses and his coaching has been changed so many times ( O-Cord. included).
If he goes out there and stinks it up this year, then thats on him. And something tells me he will be the first one to say that he didn't get it done but I don' t think that he will. Most football heads out there have a consensus that he is an adequate QB to run this offense and do some good things. Will he be a top 10 QB, thats left to be said but as of right now, he's still one of the top 32 in the league and thats all that matters.
Wow. Not sure what in my post is incorrect or exaggerated to warrant such a distinction. Nothing I said in terms of other teams and their opinion of JC is incorrect. The Broncos even went as far as to say that JC just wasn't the right fit and were willing to take less for Orton. I guess it is the typical response you would expect from a JC apologist, though. Regardless, you use (or you reference) some great words to describe JC. I like "adequate" the best. Because personally, my dream is to have an "adequate" QB. And even saying that JC is no Manning or Rivers is laughable.
I am not questioning JC's ability. I never did. I never have. On paper, JC has all the tools to succeed, big arm, tall, big hands, good drop back --- but he has yet to fully succeed in his four full years in the NFL. In 2007, his injury was arguably the reason we made the playoffs.
And your one example of JC showing emotion is actually fairly funny. I am not asking JC to jump up in the air, I am asking him to be a leader and show fire throughout the game. Do you really think that JC was the leader head and shoulders above everyone else last year? Do you really think that he consistently showed fire or grit last year? You would be a crazy person to say yes. Also, "Staying even" does not mean to not show emotion, but to play consistently throughout the season. Do you not understand that? Did JC play consistently this season? He feel apart in the second half and after teams realized he had a slow release and slow to make decisions in the pocket, they were putting 8 in the box ---- literally asking JC to throw ---- and punishing our best player, CP, in the process.
But hey, if you want an unemotional QB that is not a leader, you have him. And I again see the typical JC apologist excuse. Good QBs learn offenses. It doesn't take them 4 years to adjust to the speed of the league. JC had 2 years in the Gibbs offense and this will be his second in Zorns. Like you said, we'll see what happens --- and I hope he does well, but to come on here, say my post was idiotic and then make a post with no actual point (outside of your personal opinions), well thats "on you".